Started By
Message

re: NYT: Protect Pedophiles

Posted on 10/6/14 at 12:58 pm to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Posted by Hawkeye95
if you read the op-ed, it sounds more than reasonable in fact a good idea. How can you argue, we should not try to stop child molestation before it starts?

the op ed is very clear that if they commit a crime, they should suffer the consequences. But why not try to get them help before they commit a crime?



Zach's an idiot and no one read the actual oped. That's why people are posting that OMG they want to make pedo "normal" or the tired slippery slope trope.
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1859 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

Maybe they are born that way, but until they are allowed to seek help and allow us to study them without fear of reprisal we may never know. You didn't realize you were doing it but you proved the need for the programs suggested in the OP-ed. Sounds like you are firmly on the side of science and reason, congrats.


They have been studying it for ages, moron. There already are scientists who study pedophilia that say it is a genetic trait. Will there be a movement to make pedophilia legal now that it is being proven genetic? Slippery slope.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

My problem is I really can't believe we ever let these people back out into society after they commit this crime.

I feel like Pedos, Murderers and rapists should be a lifetime you're done kind of thing.

I see your point, I am just not sure its a good use of funds. From what I understand in the article is you commit a sex crime (say date rape), and while serve time its discovered you are a predo, you could be locked up forever b.c of it. that doesn't sound like america to me.

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113753 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

How can you argue, we should not try to stop child molestation before it starts?


Because the recidivism rate is something like 90%. Can't be cured. Besides, once you categorize it as a 'disability' then the ADA kicks in and they get benefits.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

quote:
If you read the actual oped you see how stupid your arguments and the arguments put forth by front page about slippery slope are. It's pathetic really.


I read the actual oped and your assertion that the OP is from a 'HEADLINE' is so stupid that I would not reappear on this thread if I were you. But if you want more embarrassment, knock yourself out.


If you read the NYT oped and you're posting based off that you should quit the internets old man.
This post was edited on 10/6/14 at 1:01 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113753 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

Zach's an idiot and no one read the actual oped.


I did. And I'm sure some others did. That would make you a liar as well as a fool.
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19913 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:02 pm to
Wait, wait, wait, weren't there a bunch of complete f*cking idiots on here just a couple months back mocking anyone who would suggest that the far left would be making this exact proposition???


Nooooooooooooooo, it could never happen.


Just like in the '90's after Bowers v. Hardwick came out and we were all assured that only someone with a single-digit IQ would ever suggest that gay marriage is a Constitutional right.


You stupid mother f*ckers will never learn how truly demented and sick the left is.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Because the recidivism rate is something like 90%.

for those that are caught, this is for those who seek treatment before committing a crime.
quote:

once you categorize it as a 'disability' then the ADA kicks in and they get benefits.

what specifically is your concern? what benefits are you worried about them getting?
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

quote:
Maybe they are born that way, but until they are allowed to seek help and allow us to study them without fear of reprisal we may never know. You didn't realize you were doing it but you proved the need for the programs suggested in the OP-ed. Sounds like you are firmly on the side of science and reason, congrats.


They have been studying it for ages, moron. There already are scientists who study pedophilia that say it is a genetic trait. Will there be a movement to make pedophilia legal now that it is being proven genetic? Slippery slope.


Do you seriously believe because pedophilia is genetic like any number of mental disorders that pedophilia would be legalized? That rape would be legalized?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113753 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

If you read the NYT oped and you're posting based off that you should quit the internets old man.


The article is there for all to read. Posters can decide for themselves, moron.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54755 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

Posted by MMauler
Wait, wait, wait, weren't there a bunch of complete f*cking idiots on here just a couple months back mocking anyone who would suggest that the far left would be making this exact proposition???


Nooooooooooooooo, it could never happen.


Just like in the '90's after Bowers v. Hardwick came out and we were all assured that only someone with a single-digit IQ would ever suggest that gay marriage is a Constitutional right.


You stupid mother f*ckers will never learn how truly demented and sick the left is.



So what is it that is being put forth in the oped that is exactly like the previously posted proposition?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23514 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

what specifically is your concern? what benefits are you worried about them getting?


Specifically, they would likely get home health, a stipend for living expenses, and access to unlimited mental health personnel, facilities and medications.

Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113753 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

for those that are caught, this is for those who seek treatment before committing a crime.


Oh please. So a ped is going to feel an urge and then walk into a clinic and say 'please stop me'. Besides, what is preventing that from happening now? If he hasn't committed a crime he won't get arrested for seeking help.

quote:

what specifically is your concern? what benefits are you worried about them getting?


Are you kidding? You're not familiar with the ADA? If it is classified as a disability then a worker can file suit if his place of employment allows children. He must have a 'child free' environment or be compensated.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
31558 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Specifically, they would likely get home health, a stipend for living expenses, and access to unlimited mental health personnel, facilities and medications.


Yep you're right...molesting kids is a better option.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Specifically, they would likely get home health, a stipend for living expenses, and access to unlimited mental health personnel, facilities and medications.


the ADA provides for that? Color me shocked. I thought it was just equal access.

Do you have a link for me?
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23514 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Yep you're right...molesting kids is a better option.


You falsely presume any of those resources would prevent that from occurring.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Oh please. So a ped is going to feel an urge and then walk into a clinic and say 'please stop me'. Besides, what is preventing that from happening now? If he hasn't committed a crime he won't get arrested for seeking help.


you honestly didn't read the source oped did you? He could get fired from their job if they seek treatment, which is what the author is arguing is a bad idea. Seek treatment for pedophilia and get fired, do you see how that could be a deterrent for seeking treatment?
quote:

Are you kidding? You're not familiar with the ADA? If it is classified as a disability then a worker can file suit if his place of employment allows children. He must have a 'child free' environment or be compensated.


I believe the author suggests that there should be a carve out in protection when it comes to jobs with kids around, such as a teacher.

Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
48757 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

Just like in the '90's after Bowers v. Hardwick came out and we were all assured that only someone with a single-digit IQ would ever suggest that gay marriage is a Constitutional right.


You do realize that Bowers v. Hardwick was a 5-4 decision, don't you?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
31558 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

You falsely presume any of those resources would prevent that from occurring.


And your presumption that they wouldn't is based on? I'd rather know where the potential threats living then not. Seems like a very fair trade to me...but I have two young kids so maybe I put more import on knowing where they pervs are than you.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23514 posts
Posted on 10/6/14 at 1:20 pm to
Medicaid provides it. I thought the posters point was that once deemed a disability, they would receive benefits.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram