Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

NYT Op-Ed: Stop Critical Thinking

Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:11 pm
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15596 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:11 pm
After seeing this headline in the meme thread, I had to read this op-ed. NYT link at the bottom for those who dare.



Some highlights from "experts" on how to effectively evaluate information online:

quote:

Influenced by the research of Sam Wineburg, a professor at Stanford, and Sarah McGrew, an assistant professor at the University of Maryland, Mr. Caulfield argued that the best way to learn about a source of information is to leave it and look elsewhere, a concept called lateral reading.


quote:

Mr. Caulfield walked me through the process using an Instagram post from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent anti-vaccine activist, falsely alleging a link between the human papillomavirus vaccine and cancer. “If this is not a claim where I have a depth of understanding, then I want to stop for a second and, before going further, just investigate the source,” Mr. Caulfield said. He copied Mr. Kennedy’s name in the Instagram post and popped it into Google. “Look how fast this is,” he told me as he counted the seconds out loud. In 15 seconds, he navigated to Wikipedia and scrolled through the introductory section of the page, highlighting with his cursor the last sentence, which reads that Mr. Kennedy is an anti-vaccine activist and a conspiracy theorist.

“Is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. the best, unbiased source on information about a vaccine? I’d argue no. And that’s good enough to know we should probably just move on,” he said.


Is Wikipedia the best, unbiased source on information?




quote:

What is potentially revolutionary about SIFT is that it focuses on making quick judgments. A SIFT fact check can and should take just 30, 60, 90 seconds to evaluate a piece of content.


quote:

The four steps are based on the premise that you often make a better decision with less information than you do with more. Also, spending 15 minutes to determine a single fact in order to decipher a tweet or a piece of news coming from a source you’ve never seen before will often leave you more confused than you were before. “The question we want students asking is: Is this a good source for this purpose, or could I find something better relatively quickly? Mr. Caulfield said. “I’ve seen in the classroom where a student finds a great answer in three minutes but then keeps going and ends up won over by bad information.”


quote:

“We’ve been trained to think that Googling or just checking one resource we trust is almost like cheating,” he said. “But when people search Google, the best results may not always be first, but the good information is usually near the top. Often you see a pattern in the links of a consensus that’s been formed.


Is Google the best, unbiased source on information?

Who has time to critically evaluate another point of view? Just Google it and go with your preconceived notions.

Warning - NYT
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 10:14 pm
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31404 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

“We’ve been trained to think that Googling or just checking one resource we trust is almost like cheating,” he said. “But when people search Google, the best results may not always be first, but the good information is usually near the top. Often you see a pattern in the links of a consensus that’s been formed.





That's some serious native advertising. I guess Google doesn't really need to advertise itself in the NYT, but you never know.
This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 8:08 am
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
61033 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

but the good information is usually near the top. Often you see a pattern in the links of a consensus that’s been formed.




"All the sources and media outlets Google is in league with have been put there at the top and never question anything they feed you. So glad that's settled. Pick our sources only."
This post was edited on 2/20/21 at 10:24 pm
Posted by Cossatotjoe
Member since Oct 2020
938 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:22 pm to
Wait, this isn’t the Babylon Bee?
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
79876 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

the best results may not always be first, but the good information is usually near the top.


Your search results are based on data they take from you and attempt to manipulate you by placing the results in a certain order.

This chode is completely ignorant as to how Google actually works.
Posted by Cossatotjoe
Member since Oct 2020
938 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:35 pm to
He is not ignorant, but he hopes his readers are.
Posted by saintsfan6
TX
Member since Aug 2016
550 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:43 pm to
This is all such BS. Obviously you should make sure information is legitimate before calling it gospel, but fricking google and Wikipedia?!

Don’t listen them, just google it!
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 10:52 pm to
quote:

Your search results are based on data they take from you and attempt to manipulate you by placing the results in a certain order.


This, and the search results that occur near the top because firms that do search engine optimization get paid to keep their clients information appearing at the top of search results.
Posted by BeNotDeceivedGal6_7
Member since May 2019
7039 posts
Posted on 2/20/21 at 11:17 pm to
I let my bird tell me which parts are worth ignoring.



Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
6434 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 10:32 am to
quote:

In 15 seconds, he navigated to Wikipedia and scrolled through the introductory section of the page, highlighting with his cursor the last sentence, which reads that Mr. Kennedy is an anti-vaccine activist and a conspiracy theorist.


Wikipedia also calls anyone that questions the actions of Israel an anti-semite. If you try to edit the entry, it will revert back to the anti-semitism claim within minutes. Wikipedia will then lock out everyone but their approved editors from the entry. It is nothing more than NWO propaganda at this point.

quote:

Is Wikipedia the best, unbiased source on information?


There's a reason why schools don't allow wikipedia as a reference.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29349 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 10:49 am to
“Believe exactly what you are told to believe.”

Jesus.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
17548 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 11:19 am to
We are living in an Information Panopticon.



This post was edited on 2/21/21 at 11:22 am
Posted by Boring
Member since Feb 2019
3792 posts
Posted on 2/21/21 at 12:00 pm to
(((Warzel)))

There’s a fricking surprise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram