- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More evidence of Google filtering search results. Updated with real time video of search
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:25 am to Placebeaux
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:25 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Well Ive proved it to be true
And that’s fine. Unfortunately, with an absolute claim, all it takes is one piece of evidence showing the contrary for that claim to crumble into dirt.
If I say “all birds fly” and you come up and show me a dodo bird, guess what? I’m a liar. Doesn’t matter if all of the other species of birds fly. My absolute statement is false.
Just like the absolute statement “Hillary Clinton’s em” doesn’t autocorrect to “Hillary Clinton’s emails” on google is incorrect.
0
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:25 am to beerJeep
quote:Not on mine.
What I did say, however, was that Hillary Clinton’s em DOES autofill to Hillary Clinton’s emails on mobile.
So, I think it's probably more accurate to say, you proved it is autofilling on YOUR mobile.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:27 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Of course you didn't.
Right. I just photoshopped all my pictures and edited my video to prove the OP wrong.
quote:
You haven't even yet established there is no manipulation in search characteristics (Hillary vs others) on your own platforms.
That wasn’t what was challenged by the OP. Now was it?
quote:
You have established a variance between some mobile devices, and between mobile devices and computers. That is certainly of interest. But there is no question Google is manipulating exactly as the OP holds. None! It is not even a debatable point.
No. It just PROVES A frickING ABSOLUTE STSTEMENT FALSE
quote:
Your observations, at best, simply establish Google is screwing with something less than 100% of it's searches.
It’s like I’m talking to a brick wall
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:28 am to beerJeep
quote:Not on my mobile devices, and not on others'.
What I did say, however, was that Hillary Clinton’s em DOES autofill to Hillary Clinton’s emails on mobile. Which it does.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:29 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Not on mine
That’s fine. Doesn’t need to be. Don’t you love absolute statements?
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:29 am to beerJeep
quote:
beerJeep
I'd like to point out that in your video, emails is 3rd down.
My searches only generate 2 autofills. Perhaps that's a setting. Maybe if I had mine set to generate 3-4 autofills, I'd get emails.
But, that's still weird because literally every other famous person I typed in, email was the first auto fill.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:29 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Not on my mobile devices, and not on others'.
Prove it. Screen cap a video like I did. You have an iPhone X so you should have no issue.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:31 am to ShortyRob
quote:
I'd like to point out that in your video, emails is 3rd down.
Never said differently.
quote:
My searches only generate 2 autofills. Perhaps that's a setting. Maybe if I had mine set to generate 3-4 autofills, I'd get emails.
Mines on the default setting and idk how or what to change to alter that.
quote:
But, that's still weird because literally every other famous person I typed in, email was the first auto fill.
Probably so. But we aren’t talking about anyone else. We’re talking about how google “never” autofills “Hillary Clinton’s em” to Hillary Clinton’s emails.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:31 am to beerJeep
Dude. Lots of us are having the same results. Not sure why this is so important to you.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:35 am to BBONDS25
Because I don’t understand how homeboy can sit here and tell me I’m lying when I have photographic and video proof. All he’s doing now is crawfishing and moving the goal post.
But uh uh uh like. Uh. It’s 3rd on the list. Uh uh uh mobile. Uh uh uh it’s your recent searches.
,just admit that absolute statements are bullshite. Especially when talking about a search engine that is beyond easy to manipulate from the outside.
But uh uh uh like. Uh. It’s 3rd on the list. Uh uh uh mobile. Uh uh uh it’s your recent searches.
,just admit that absolute statements are bullshite. Especially when talking about a search engine that is beyond easy to manipulate from the outside.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:35 am to beerJeep
quote:Wow, are you lucid?
Right. I just photoshopped all my pictures
quote:It was EXACTLY what was challenged by the OP.
That wasn’t what was challenged by the OP. Now was it?
If an autofill search string loads 10th vs 1st due to engine manipulation, that equates to filtering.
quote:Does Google filter autofill search results? Yes or No?
It’s like I’m talking to a brick wall
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:37 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Wow, are you lucid?
You tell me mr all I talk in is absolutes.
quote:
was EXACTLY what was challenged by the OP.
What’s challenged by the op is whether or not “Hillary Clinton’s em” autocorrects to “Hillary Clinton’s emails”
quote:
Does Google filter autofill search results? Yes or No?
Link me where i said they don’t
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:37 am to beerJeep
quote:It's not that your lying. It's that you don't understand how this works.
Because I don’t understand how homeboy can sit here and tell me I’m lying when I have photographic and video proof.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:38 am to AlxTgr
quote:
It's not that your lying. It's that you don't understand how this works.
No. I definitely know how it works. Do you know how absolute statements work? Because that is what the op is. And I disproved that absolute statement.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:40 am to beerJeep
quote:Well. I'm not terribly concerned with the OPs absolute.
Probably so. But we aren’t talking about anyone else. We’re talking about how google “never” autofills “Hillary Clinton’s em” to Hillary Clinton’s emails.
CLEARLY, there is some odd difference between how she's being handled vs people similar to her which, given that she's the only one with a recent email scandal, makes for a very odd result.
I mean, I suspect that if you type in Bill Cosby rap.....you'll get "rape" as an autofill in the top couple. If you got it #10 when you searched George Bush rap.......that would be interesting but still, the expected hierarchy.
On the other hand. If it came up 5th for Cosby and first for Bush, you'd be like WTF???
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:41 am to ShortyRob
quote:and there it is.
literally every other famous person I typed in, email was the first auto fill.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:42 am to NC_Tigah
quote:beerjeep wants to act like what you get when you type other people doesn't matter but that's just an odd assertion.
and there it is.
I mean, if you NEVER got email as first autofill for anyone, it wouldn't even be noteworthy to not get it for Hillary either. It would just indicate that email doesn't typically autofill.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:44 am to ShortyRob
quote:
beerjeep wants to act like what you get when you type other people doesn't matter but that's just an odd assertion.
Because they don’t. The assertion is “Hillary Clinton’s em” does not autofill to “Hillary Clinton’s emails”
Anything besides that is irrelevant.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:45 am to beerJeep
quote:Does Google filter autofill results relative to negative Hillary Clinton searches? Yes or No?
Link me where i said they don’t
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:46 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Does Google filter autofill results relative to negative Hillary Clinton searches? Yes or No?
Absolutely. Never claimed otherwise.
I did, however, go against the SPECIFIC claim that Hillary Clinton’s em doesn’t autofill to Hillary clintons emails. Which I backed up with photo and video proof.
This post was edited on 12/17/18 at 10:48 am
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News