- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More evidence of Google filtering search results. Updated with real time video of search
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:21 am to theunknownknight
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:21 am to theunknownknight
According to the Duckduckgo CEO Google uses location data that puts entire ZIP codes in politically biased 'filter bubbles'
LINK
LINK
0
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:29 am to mahdragonz
quote:No it isn't.
It's the inverse of that.
Of course it isn't.
When one searches the complete string "Hillary Clinton email" one gets consistent results. Google presents consistent material re: "Hillary Clinton email". There isn't any vagueness in the context of the search or content.
quote:The content is so broad? Do you hear yourself?
The content is so broad with that phrase that Google recognizes it needs more information from the user.
What coincident "broad content" (i.e., other search terms beginning with the same string) associated with the term "em" or "ema" or "emai" or "email" would be so confounding to the google engine that it would shut off autofills altogether? There are none.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The content is so broad? Do you hear yourself?
What coincident "broad content" (i.e., other search terms beginning with the same string) associated with the term "em" or "ema" or "emai" or "email" would be so confounding to the google engine that it would shut off autofills altogether? There are none.
It is really weird how rank and file liberals will go to the wall pretending to not notice shite like this.
It really tells you that they are of the lowest possible character.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:32 am to ShortyRob
quote:
There are apparently more searches for Hillary Clinton Emoji than there are for Hillary Clinton email.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:35 am to NC_Tigah
When I saw her do that at the convention, I was just honestly dumbfounded.
The woman has been in the orbit of one of the greatest politicians of the 20th century at presenting himself as a "real" person...........and literally NONE of it rubbed off on her.
It is truly amazing.
Surely, even every liberal who saw that cringed a little.
The woman has been in the orbit of one of the greatest politicians of the 20th century at presenting himself as a "real" person...........and literally NONE of it rubbed off on her.
It is truly amazing.
Surely, even every liberal who saw that cringed a little.
This post was edited on 12/17/18 at 9:35 am
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:41 am to ShortyRob
Once again in another Google bias thread all these liberals got owned but none of them with admit it and stick to their debunked theories
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:43 am to Placebeaux
quote:They don't care. They know it's happening. This is just another example of how liberals consider being completely dishonest to be a strategy.
Once again in another Google bias thread all these liberals got owned but none of them with admit it and stick to their debunked theories
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:49 am to Placebeaux
Interesting you got that result. I used my business phone, which isn't my normal phone, and I don't use auto fill on results.
I typed: Hillary Clinton e
This is the result:
Doesn't look filtered to me.
I typed: Hillary Clinton e
This is the result:
Doesn't look filtered to me.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:55 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
The fact that on android mobile platforms Google performs differently?
Son, you said you used an iPhone X, yet I posted a video of my iPhone X and you’re still calling it android
quote:
So again, where does the autofill for "email" in other politician searches fall relative to Hillary even on your device? Does it still come up as #3 or 4? Or is it in the #1 spot as is the case apparently with all other platforms?
Watch the video stupid frick
Posted on 12/17/18 at 9:59 am to HubbaBubba
The suggestion never comes up. You searched hillary clinton e and look how she is cleared for the second time of all charges.
Now on DuckDuckGo
also note that a search on DDG for hillary clinton e shows nothing unless you click search only for hillary clinton e
PS: this was my phone
Now on DuckDuckGo
also note that a search on DDG for hillary clinton e shows nothing unless you click search only for hillary clinton e
PS: this was my phone
This post was edited on 12/17/18 at 10:01 am
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:00 am to beerJeep
quote:
Watch the video stupid frick
Oooooo he gettin mad. Why you mad bro?
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:04 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Oooooo he gettin mad. Why you mad bro?
Me? Mad?
I’m just amazed at homeboys idiocy. I’ve posted screencap after screencap and even a video proving the stupid frick wrong and he’s still here babbling about Android or some shite He’s moved the goal post several times now and it’s absolutely hilarious watching him fall on his face over this.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:05 am to beerJeep
Have you watched my videos showing the google bias and protection of hillary?
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:09 am to Placebeaux
quote:
Have you watched my videos showing the google bias and protection of hillary?
The argument of the op is that google doesn’t autofill “Hillary Clinton’s em” to Hillary Clinton’s emails. I proved that to be false. Does google have bias? Absolutely and if you can find me saying the opposite, please do quote it.
The fact remains though, that Hillary Clinton’s em does in fact autofill to Hillary Clinton’s emails. Is it the top result? No. But it’s there.
Oh. And for the record, I think ole girl should be 6 feet under.
See, the fun think about absolutes is all it takes is ONE example of it being not true and you’ve disproven it.
This post was edited on 12/17/18 at 10:10 am
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:11 am to beerJeep
Not for me. I get “Hillary Clinton emoji” with em. Ema yeilds zero suggestions. Without touching the em I just change the name and every single one...tried 6....have email as the top suggestion.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:16 am to beerJeep
quote:You sober now?
stupid frick
beer, as was told to you last night, the fact you somehow generate different results than most is not terribly relevant. It's like someone documenting voter fraud at 50% of precincts but not yours, so you claim it is not a problem.
Of course it's a problem!
Now that you may be more coherent though, let me ask you again to examine whether there is an autofill differential --- even on your device. Run the search string "Hillary Clinton em" vs "Bill Clinton em" on your platform and see if "Bill Clinton email" autofill is not the first choice offered.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:18 am to beerJeep
quote:
The argument of the op is that google doesn’t autofill “Hillary Clinton’s em” to Hillary Clinton’s emails. I proved that to be false.
All I can tell you is what happened on my computer at home.
I typed in Hillary Clinton em and got "emoji" as my auto-fill.
I typed in many other choices and got email.
That's what occurred and is still occurring.
Just tried it on my Google Pixel. Same thing. The 2 autofills that showed up are emoji and employment.
It is what it is.
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:19 am to beerJeep
quote:
The argument of the op is that google doesn’t autofill “Hillary Clinton’s em” to Hillary Clinton’s emails. I proved that to be false.
Well Ive proved it to be true
Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:22 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
beer, as was told to you last night, the fact you somehow generate different results than most is not terribly relevant. It's like someone documenting voter fraud at 50% of precincts but not yours, so you claim it is not a problem.
ohhhhhhh sooooo the whole “you prove that the op assertion is wrong, it’s not relevant” quote:
Of course it's a problem!
Never said that google censoring things wasn’t a problem. What I did say, however, was that Hillary Clinton’s em DOES autofill to Hillary Clinton’s emails on mobile. Which it does. As I’ve given you proof multiple times.
quote:
Now that you may be more coherent though, let me ask you again to examine whether there is an autofill differential --- even on your device. Run the search string "Hillary Clinton em" vs "Bill Clinton em" on your platform and see if "Bill Clinton email" autofill is not the first choice offered.
And, once again, I will remind you, that any search for bill clinton is completely separate and has zero to do with if “Hillary Clinton’s em” autofill to “Hillary Clinton’s emails”
Now, if you’d be so kind. Please tell the class how my “android” phone
is giving just me special results that’s I’ve somehow swayed to be the ONLY person in America to get. Posted on 12/17/18 at 10:24 am to beerJeep
quote:Of course you didn't.
I proved that to be false.
You haven't even yet established there is no manipulation in search characteristics (Hillary vs others) on your own platforms.
You have established a variance between some mobile devices, and between mobile devices and computers. That is certainly of interest. But there is no question Google is manipulating exactly as the OP holds. None! It is not even a debatable point.
Your observations, at best, simply establish Google is screwing with something less than 100% of it's searches.
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News