- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Miss Lindsay to call “for” no witnesses
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:36 am
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:36 am
In the impeachment trial in the Senate.
MORE SWAMP bullshite! He knows damned well this shite soup will spill across the aisle and into his lap.
Edited so the the fricking “attorneys“ can understand the point of the post.
MORE SWAMP bullshite! He knows damned well this shite soup will spill across the aisle and into his lap.
Edited so the the fricking “attorneys“ can understand the point of the post.
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 9:46 am
14
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:37 am to lsufanz
I knew She would pull this Shitt.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:38 am to lsufanz
Jurors and juries don't call witnesses. Jesus H. Christ, stop coming straight from Facebook to post here please.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:38 am to lsufanz
Write your senators. Tell them if they fricke this up you will never vote for them or anyone like them again.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:38 am to lsufanz
Lindsey is probably knee deep in Ukrainian corruption, too
Remember, he admitted yesterday that him and John McCain were looking at the dossier LONG BEFORE it was made public. Lindsey hid this from the public for over 3 years
He is not to be trusted
Remember, he admitted yesterday that him and John McCain were looking at the dossier LONG BEFORE it was made public. Lindsey hid this from the public for over 3 years
He is not to be trusted
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:38 am to lsufanz
As expected, Ukrainian money went everywhere, they ain’t opening themselves up to discovery
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:38 am to lsufanz
There wont be an impeachment trial in the senate . DEMs want Impeachment , Republicans have the goods with DEM frickery with FBI . Deals are being made behind close doors . Nothing will happen on anything .
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 9:42 am
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:40 am to Bunyan
quote:
Remember, he admitted yesterday that him and John McCain were looking at the dossier LONG BEFORE it was made public. Lindsey hid this from the public for over 3 years
He is not to be trusted
Yup that was all i needed to hear
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:40 am to AUin02
I don’t read Facebook, and if you don’t understand the point of my post you can ask. I’ll come here and post what I want. Don’t read it, that’s up to you.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:41 am to DreauxB2015
quote:
There wont be an impeachment trial in the senate .
It will be swift if there is. There simply is no way Rs will convict. That is there will be insufficient defections from Rs to the Ds. Maybe the one-term senator from Utah and the gentle ladies from Alaska and Maine. That's about it.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:42 am to AUin02
quote:
Jurors and juries don't call witnesses. Jesus H. Christ, stop coming straight from Facebook to post here please
Senate trial is not a courtroom.
The Senators control every rule by simple majority vote.
The reason there will be no witnesses is because 47 Democrats and 4 Republicans can block anything.
Lindsey is correct because he can count.
You are wrong because you didn't pay attention in Civics.
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 9:45 am
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:43 am to lsufanz
As stated, the senators are jurors. Juries don’t call witnesses. Defense lawyers do.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:43 am to Bunyan
quote:
He is not to be trusted
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:44 am to lsufanz
I understand where Lindsey is coming from. If there is a Senate Trial, then they can call Trump to testify under oath and we all know that magnificent orange bastard cant help but trip over his own tongue. He flies off the handle, cant keep to script and risks perjuring himself. Not worth the risk imo
Of course i would love a senate trial to go after the Dems, but its just not worth it imo.
Of course i would love a senate trial to go after the Dems, but its just not worth it imo.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:47 am to AuburnTigers
quote:
f there is a Senate Trial, then they can call Trump to testify under oath and we all know that magnificent orange bastard cant help but trip over his own tongue.
No defendant in a trial has to testify. I assume you've served on a jury. In judges instruction this has been covered in trial I've ever been a juror in.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:47 am to lsufanz
I have really been conflicted about this.
While I would love for the chance to lay all of this open while the country's eyes are on the trial, considering what Horowtiz said, and didn't say, yesterday, this may be to make sure nothing the GOP might do in the Senate could operate to screw up what Durham/Barr are working on.
This sets up the ability to get this dismissed and to lay bare the horribly abusive process in the House while doing so (which has been clear for everyone with a brain to see - now the progs can get a taste).
While I would love for the chance to lay all of this open while the country's eyes are on the trial, considering what Horowtiz said, and didn't say, yesterday, this may be to make sure nothing the GOP might do in the Senate could operate to screw up what Durham/Barr are working on.
This sets up the ability to get this dismissed and to lay bare the horribly abusive process in the House while doing so (which has been clear for everyone with a brain to see - now the progs can get a taste).
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:48 am to lsufanz
It's up to Trump to call witnesses, no?
I wonder if McConnell's talk of using the process to validate / acquit Trump is a trick to lure him into testifying.
I wonder if McConnell's talk of using the process to validate / acquit Trump is a trick to lure him into testifying.
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:48 am to lsufanz
I would bet the Senate trial doesn't last a week. Someone is going to motion to acquit and before you know it, the trial will be over.
If 38 R's go on record and state that the case was not made by the House and they are going to vote to not remove, then the trial is just a waste of time and money. For all we know, Trump may be pushing for this to happen, to get it out of the way.
If 38 R's go on record and state that the case was not made by the House and they are going to vote to not remove, then the trial is just a waste of time and money. For all we know, Trump may be pushing for this to happen, to get it out of the way.
This post was edited on 12/12/19 at 9:49 am
Posted on 12/12/19 at 9:51 am to lsufanz
I already posted this info.
The impeachment vote fix is already in.
11 or so democrats will vote no in the house and 5 will vote no in the Senate.
That way it can be seen as a bi-partisan rejection of impeachment and removal while guaranteeing that the Republicans wont call witness that will expose the dems and their fellow republicans who use foreign aid to line their and their families pockets.
The impeachment vote fix is already in.
11 or so democrats will vote no in the house and 5 will vote no in the Senate.
That way it can be seen as a bi-partisan rejection of impeachment and removal while guaranteeing that the Republicans wont call witness that will expose the dems and their fellow republicans who use foreign aid to line their and their families pockets.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News