Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Margin of Error in polls is the best scam

Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:40 am
Posted by Covingtontiger77
Member since Dec 2015
10188 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:40 am
I’m going to take your money and poll for you.

Then I’m not sure if the results are 100% accurate so what I am going to do is hedge 2-4% in either way.

Sounds good?



Pollsters are weather people when it comes to accuracy.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28525 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:44 am to
One poll is a general indicator of where things stand today, not a prediction of what will happen tomorrow and not an exact measurement of where we are today.

2012 everyone said the polls were skewed against Romney. That turned out to not only be false, but they actually underestimated Obama’s performance.

2016 the polls were actually trending in Trump’s favor in the final days, so much so that those of us who were paying attention saw that the race was very close according to the polls prior to Election Day.
Posted by FooManChoo
Member since Dec 2012
41644 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:45 am to
MOE is a statistical necessity when you are sampling. That’s just how it works.

The scam is in the questions and the forced composition of the responders included in the polls.
Posted by Bayoubred
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2011
3349 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:47 am to
I said in the fall of 2016 that if Trump was within 3 in the polls he would win He was about 3.5 the day before if i recall and he lost popular vote by 2.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56353 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 8:49 am to
quote:

One poll is a general indicator of where things stand today, not a prediction of what will happen tomorrow and not an exact measurement of where we are today.


That’s the way it should be.

That’s not what we have. We have polls being manipulated to fit a desired result.
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2849 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:00 am to
Margin of error is a mathematical reality when one tries to determine what a given number of people are going to do by questioning a small sample of them. You’re looking at the wrong thing. How a poll is sampled (number of registered democrats versus republicans being an example) and how the questions are worded is how political polls are manipulated.
This post was edited on 10/1/20 at 9:01 am
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94824 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:01 am to
MOE is realistic to a degree but it still depends on having good questions asked.

You can have a push poll written that will say 102% Biden with a 2% MOE but it is useless as a predictor because it was shite data.
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
6875 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:04 am to
People can purposely mislead a pollster. The weather cannot. Both are unpredictable though.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Pollsters are weather people when it comes to accuracy.


Unless the poll(s) line up with your beliefs!
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
14222 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:34 am to
Turnout modeling is the scam of polling, it can be manipulated to get the outcome wanted.
Posted by WorkinDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
9341 posts
Posted on 10/1/20 at 9:43 am to
quote:

One poll is a general indicator of where things stand today, not a prediction of what will happen tomorrow and not an exact measurement of where we are today.


There is no way that Biden is outperforming Hillary by 15 points. No way. Like a bad troll attempt, Dems/ media/ deep state are tipping their hand.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram