- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Maddie Scharfenstein, Sage Ryan and double standard of the "N-word"
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:16 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:16 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Next, is your point that voter ID would then lead to a database that tracks our votes? Sounds like something we should be opposed to.
that's gonna leave a mark.
0
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:16 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
they're completely different things.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:17 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
It’s easy now because voter ID laws have changed to be more inclusive….right?
Have you just been fricking with everyone this whole time? If so, well done, I fell for it 
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:17 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You mean Democrats?
Yep, he's going to go back to the George and Lester era, at the very least. Democrats are going to Democrat.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:18 pm to Azkiger
quote:
You mean Democrats?
Party labels flipped but yeah white conservatives
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Right...which certainly makes them entirely separate.
I never argued that they're separate, only that conservatives are right to fear confiscation when the discussion of firearm licensure comes up seeing that one historically follows the other.
Unfortunately for your sorry attempt at a gotcha, the same cannot be said for voting.
This post was edited on 1/3/23 at 2:21 pm
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:20 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Next, is your point that voter ID would then lead to a database that tracks our votes?
Why would voter id be needed for this?
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:22 pm to Azkiger
Yeah, I think you missed part of my post.
It's always going to be amusing watching you folks pretend I'm just fricking winging it, like I didn't already know I was correct.
It's always going to be amusing watching you folks pretend I'm just fricking winging it, like I didn't already know I was correct.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:22 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
I’ll start another thread on historical laws that conservatives pushed that were harmful to minorities and we can converse there….I’d love to hear your thoughts
Slavery and Jim Crow were compliments of Democrats.
Stop listening to the Liberal media.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:22 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
There's something deeply ironic in you posting a Michael Scott gif.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:22 pm to jchamil
quote:
Why would voter id be needed for this?
Why would a license be required for a firearms registry?
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:25 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
Party labels flipped but yeah white conservatives
That's another Democrat talking point!
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:25 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Yeah, I think you missed part of my post.
No, it was irrelevant hand-waving.
You're trying to push a round peg into a square hole by suggesting our right to vote is in similar danger by voter ID as our right to own a firearm is by firearm ID.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:28 pm to Azkiger
quote:
No, it was irrelevant hand-waving.
It obliterates your argument.
quote:
You're trying to push a round peg into a square hole by suggesting our right to vote is in similar danger by voter ID as our right to own a firearm is by firearm ID.
The comparison is apt, regardless of how you deal with that. It's demonstrably hypocritical to support one and not the other.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:30 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
The comparison is apt
*imagines state/federal officials showing up to your door to confiscate your vote*
Ok, sure it's an amazing comparison.Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:33 pm to Azkiger
quote:
*imagines state/federal officials showing up to your door to confiscate your vote*
Ok, sure it's an amazing comparison.
There you go again, conflating two separate policies.
I thought we were past that...
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:35 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
There you go again, conflating two separate policies.
I thought we were past that...
My concern is that licensure ---> no guns.
The same cannot be said for licensure ---> no voting.
I'm sorry, but I cannot make it any simpler. If I could chew it up and spit into your mouth I would, but it doesn't work like that.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:38 pm to Azkiger
quote:
My concern is that licensure ---> no guns.
The same cannot be said for licensure ---> no voting.
Sure it can. You just think one could happen but, for whatever reason, the other cannot.
quote:
I'm sorry, but I cannot make it any simpler. If I could chew it up and spit into your mouth I would, but it doesn't work like that.
I'd settle for something cogent. It's not that your point is a difficult one. It's that it isn't reasonable.
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:39 pm to 850SaintsGator
quote:
850SaintsGator
Posted on 1/3/23 at 2:39 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Sure it can.
Historical precedence is 110% on my side.
Page 24 of 27
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News