Started By
Message

re: Los Angeles voters to decide if hotel owners can be forced to house the homeless

Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:00 pm to
Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28026 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

I think the city will pay them market rate, but the owners don't want it because the homeless will trash their place.


Ask Canada about this, they forced this on hotel owners, even nice hotels, and the middle eastern/african immigrants have absolutely trashed them.

if you try to give a review on hotel, Canadian government deletes and gives you a visit.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42514 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

on a proposal

Every person who proposes that must be required to move their entire family domicile into one of the impacted facilities - and spend at least 45 weeks a year in actual residence. Facility to be drawn at random.
Posted by Bayou Brat
Member since Jul 2021
1023 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

On the plus side, it seems California is hell-bent on becoming the "Homeless Addict Capitol of the Country" (maybe the world, eventually). If so, let them. We can start arresting panhandlers then bus them to California like Texas is doing with illegals by sending them to NYC and DC.


That's how CA get all that federal money to keep the state afloat. There are billions of dollars sitting unused that were allocated for drug rehabilitation and homeless issues. Pelosi & Co. figured out how to tap into it. It's become another scheme to launder the money into politicians pockets.



Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73254 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

LA is SoCal, sir


No its not

Posted by pochejp
Gonzales, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2007
7855 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:13 pm to
I ask again. Is this for the City of Los Angeles or Los Angeles County as a whole? The article doesn't specify.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57132 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I think the city will pay them market rate, but the owners don't want it because the homeless will trash their place.


Yep. Look what Katrina evacuees did to hotels in BR. One BR hotel got paid $400K by FEMA to house these people who did $650K worth of damage that FEMA refused to cover. It's now an OYO franchise.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
5964 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:19 pm to
Hotel I frequented while in my Charlotte office was taken off the list when I met a homeless guy getting off elevator and found out a local church/charity would put up homeless there. This was a typical Wyndham hotel.

I can both feel for people and not want to a: sleep in the same bed b: have my family in the same building.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64587 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

They did this in San Francisco during the covid lockdown. Many hotels in the tourist areas were sitting empty and the SF mayor forced them to house the homeless. They were paid at below market rates.


Just the opposite of what they did in NYC during a housing crunch. Top dollar to hotels on the government dole or your money.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
51475 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

That's how CA get all that federal money to keep the state afloat. There are billions of dollars sitting unused that were allocated for drug rehabilitation and homeless issues. Pelosi & Co. figured out how to tap into it. It's become another scheme to launder the money into politicians pockets.


That's a solid point. Many people will use the per-resident stat to say California gets some of the lowest federal funding of all the states.

quote:

The ten states with the lowest net federal funding per resident are:

1. New Jersey (-$2,368)
2. Massachusetts (-$2,343)
3. New York (-$1,792)
4. North Dakota (-$720)
5. Illinois (-$364)
6. New Hampshire (-$234)
7. Washington (-$184)
8. Nebraska (-$164)
9. Colorado (-$95)
19. California ($12)


It's a different story when you look at the raw funding totals.

quote:

The ten states with the highest total federal funding are:

1. California ($43.61 billion)
2. Texas ($26.90 billion)
3. Florida ($23.77 billion)
4. New York ($22.06 billion)
5. Virginia ($17.68 billion)
6. Pennsylvania ($15.58 billion)
7. Illinois ($13.18 billion)
8. Ohio ($12.57 billion)
9. North Carolina ($11.31 billion)
10. Michigan ($10.84 billion)


LINK

If this bill passes, don't expect for a minute that Los Angeles will not attempt to make up the loss of tax revenue from its tourism and leisure industry (due to this bill) by begging the State and/or federal government to make up for what will be a growing shortfall.
Posted by lachellie
LALA Land
Member since Aug 2012
1012 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

If it's on a ballot referendum, muh yea! That's the very essence of democracy, distilled!


Now do California Proposition 8, Same-Sex Marriage Ban Initiative (2008).

Posted by FlySaint
FL Panhandle
Member since May 2018
1784 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:40 pm to
This idea has been tried and failed in several major (i.e. Dem) cities. In some cases the hotels were complete tear downs after 9-12 months.

In one case that I’m very familiar with the hotel became a drug dealer haven, and had several murders and multiple robberies of passerby’s. A major corporation had executive level employees staying in an adjacent hotel and these people were some of the victims. PCness kept that corp from moving their people so Uber in and out became the only semi-safe option. After a year the homeless had wrecked the hotel to the point is wasn’t even habitable (at the lowest standard imaginable). It was emptied and remodeled, and reopened by a much lower level hotel chain.

Homeless people are almost exclusively drug addicts or mentally ill, predominately both. They are not capable of caring for themselves even if given lodging. The only way a hotel takeover could work is if it’s run like a prison, with discipline and routine enforced. Of course this is much more costly and DemComs can’t graft off of that..

DemComs don’t actually care about the homeless, they just want to score media points by giving the APPEARANCE of caring. IMHO the only way to treat homelessness is in a prison-like setting where they can be forced to get treatment for addiction and mental illness.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
50304 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

Los Angeles voters to decide if hotels will all shut down


FIFY

ETA: The only reason stuff like this flies is because we've lied to people for generations by pretending property taxes and zoning ordinances are acceptable. We have raised people to believe that you shouldn't have any control over your own property.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 12:43 pm
Posted by CedarChest
South of Mejico
Member since Jun 2020
2773 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

What percentage of California’s homeless have moved to California because of benefits given to them by the state?
About 99% for about 50 years now. It began with young, dumb, middle-class to upper-middle-class hippies moving out there to do everything they couldn't do back home. Instead of playing "house", they played "homeless hippies." Don't you just know Western Union made a killing back then with parents sending money to their bratty-arse kids playing "homeless?" As a result, the real thing followed the pretenders; it always does.
This post was edited on 8/7/22 at 1:13 pm
Posted by Chief One Word
Eastern Washington State
Member since Mar 2018
3684 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:43 pm to
Who pays to rebuild these hotels after the homeless thoroughly trash them?
Posted by Bruco
Charlotte, NC
Member since Aug 2016
2789 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 12:57 pm to
My god what an asinine idea. It would require hotel owners to report empty rooms every single afternoon and the city would then what, walk around and hand out vouchers?

Then what happens the next day if they have a paying customer for that room? Good luck dealing with the squatters since I’m sure these bums wont be packed up and out by checkout time.
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37586 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 1:00 pm to
Can't wait for some conservative group to ship some homeless to the Beverly Hills Hotel and they forced to accept them.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Time to buy stock in Airbnb


I’m home surprised they haven’t tried to make that illegal
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
18970 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 2:25 pm to
I’d think this would fall right in the same category as being unconstitutional to house troops in peoples homes without their consent. Any govt, state, local or federal who attempts to house anyone in private property without the consent of the property owner would be in violation of the constitution
Posted by artisticsavant
Member since Mar 2017
5007 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 2:39 pm to
I'd love to see a marketing pitch for this.

L.A.: Walk the city streets during the day, have the streets of the city sleeping at your door by night.
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25396 posts
Posted on 8/7/22 at 2:49 pm to
Please let this pass.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram