- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Life begins at conception.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:07 am
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:07 am
Prove me wrong.
22
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:07 am to beulahland
Who cares?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:07 am to beulahland
quote:
Life begins at conception.
It could not occur at any other time, obviously.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:10 am to beulahland
It depends if you make her scream or not
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:10 am to beulahland
quote:Agreed. Relevance?
Life begins at conception. Prove me wrong.
Lots of things are "alive." We kill them all the time.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Lots of things are "alive." We kill them all the time.
Humans? Because I think the issue is humans here, Hank.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:13 am to beulahland
Do you know believ3 in plants?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:13 am to beulahland
I mean I agree with you but there are a lot of different people who have different moral codes
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:13 am to beulahland
Life does begin at conception. That's when development of a new and unique life starts and naturally progresses.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:14 am to beulahland
Life begins in the sack, prove me wrong
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:14 am to GeauxTigerTM
quote:indeed. And therein lies the rub.
Because I think the issue is humans here, Hank.
Why is a "human life" entitled to protection, whereas other "life" is not?
The question of "when" that protection should vest is a related (but distinct) issue.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:16 am to beulahland
Prove yourself right
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:So, your defense is not of abortion, but the legalization of murder-for-all?
Why is a "human life" entitled to protection, whereas other "life" is not?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:19 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Lots of things are "alive." We kill them all the time.
And that is the debate. A moral society does not murder its most helpless. What sort of society you want to live in is the debate. And do we want to live in a society ruled by those with so little regard for human life?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:21 am to WildManGoose
quote:
legalization of murder-for-all?
The murder of anyone else.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:24 am to beulahland
quote:you are clinically considered dead when your heart stops beating, therefore it leads to logic that you are alive when your heart starts beating.
Prove me wrong.
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Why is a "human life" entitled to protection, whereas other "life" is not?
I'm sure you think this is some rhetorical gotcha, but really it's just silliness masquerading as some sort of high brow question.
Either way, not today...
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:26 am to WildManGoose
quote:Not at all. I am exploring the question of WHY you consider it wrong to take this particular life. I think we must answer this question in ORDER to address the propriety (or impropriety) of abortion.
So, your defense is not of abortion, but the legalization of murder-for-all?
This post was edited on 5/4/22 at 10:28 am
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:26 am to beulahland
quote:
beulahland
When will you start protesting to shut down IVF clinics for throwing away embryos?
Posted on 5/4/22 at 10:26 am to TrussvilleTide
quote:
Prove yourself right
Simple logic. Life can't develop without the union of the sperm and egg. So you know life can't begin before conception. But after that, there is no scientific way to say exactly when life beings, at conception, at the first heartbeat, when the fetus is viable outside the womb, or only at full development and birth.
With logical reasoning, you must assume it is at conception since you can't be sure otherwise and that is the surest way to ensure you are protecting life.
How can you argue it isn't a life when you have no way to prove it isn't?
Page 1 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News