Started By
Message

re: Libtard Excuses i.e. "Greatest Hits" Following Exoneration of Trump in Mueller Report

Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
47847 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

I have a feeling that you guys are relying on a pretty tortured definition of "exoneration".


Well, no collusion or conspiracy. Wasn’t that the point of the Special Prosecutor?
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

Wasn’t that the point of the Special Prosecutor?


Oppo research?
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63331 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:55 pm to
Many of our resident trumpkins will call almost anything
an exoneration.For example, if the decision is made not to
attempt to indict a sitting president in contravention of DOJ policy, I'm sure a lot of posters will argue that somehow constitutes "exoneration".
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:56 pm to
and you n know this how.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

.For example, if the decision is made not to
attempt to indict a sitting president in contravention of DOJ policy

That's probably what happened.

"We find that the President did indeed collude with Russia in an effort to sway the election. We furthermore find that he is an agent of the Russian government, and has sought to impede and obstruct this investigation at every step. Unfortunately, He's the president and we cannot indict him."
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
47847 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

attempt to indict a sitting president in contravention of DOJ policy, I'm sure a lot of posters will argue that somehow constitutes "exoneration".


Was the purpose of the SC to investigate Russian collusion? Not a single person was indicted for collusion or conspiracy. If that isn’t exoneration, what is?
This post was edited on 3/23/19 at 7:02 pm
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
73304 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

VOR


It must have taken some serious denial to keep you alive today.
Posted by facelessman07
Member since Jan 2019
197 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:27 pm to
I smell a double album on the way!
This post was edited on 3/23/19 at 9:27 pm
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 9:00 pm to
the sad part is you are 1 of the few people on this lame trump board I actually like. don't go over to the dark side. I don't want him guilty because of what it will do to the office of the presidency, but I fear it's to late for that.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
47847 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 9:48 pm to
Have you realized yet that SDNY isn’t investigating anything to do with Russia? I mean...that was a pretty ignorant thing for you to think.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 10:22 pm to
I have no love for the man. I find nothing particularly noble about him. But the alternative was much worse.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16524 posts
Posted on 3/23/19 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Many of our resident trumpkins will call almost anything an exoneration.


You and 56lsu are morons
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:41 am to
quote:

also money laundering, insurance fraud, and a lot of other things
question: does it bother you that the things trump is "guilty" of were from years and years ago? let me ask another way: why are these "crimes" suddenly not ok but have been unprosecuted for years?

quote:

and a lot of other things
link?

quote:

listen to other things besides fox and the trumpkins on the poli board
like what? the msm media has been wrong about "collusion" all along and fox/conservative media were right
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 12:45 am to
quote:

in contravention of DOJ policy
link?

quote:

Many of our resident trumpkins will call almost anything an exoneration
it was precisely that. there were allegations of collusion. the 4+ year investigation found nothing of the sort despite multiple federal agencies and the special counsel team being biased in favor of it. if that's not an exoneration, nothing is.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 2:36 am to
quote:

.For example, if the decision is made not to attempt to indict a sitting president in contravention of DOJ policy


quote:

"We find that the President did indeed collude with Russia in an effort to sway the election. We furthermore find that he is an agent of the Russian government, and has sought to impede and obstruct this investigation at every step. Unfortunately, He's the president and we cannot indict him."


quote:

That's probably what happened


That would mean Trump is the most brilliant clandestine operator on the planet. He had to pull of this grand scheme of engaging the Russians help to manipulate the election total alone, with his closest advisors having no knowledge of his actions. If he had had help those people would have obviously been discovered and indicted not having the protection of being a sitting president. Quite a feat for someone seen by liberals/democrats/media as lacking the intelligence to be president.
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 7:25 am to
never said they were. they are going after crimes that will ruin the bone spurs on his foot if he can remember which one it is.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 7:27 am to
quote:

never said they were. they are going after crimes that will ruin the bone spurs on his foot if he can remember which one it is.

Mueller is done. The Russia fairy tale is dead

You are a fool for believing it for 2 years
Posted by 56lsu
jackson mich
Member since Dec 2005
7441 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:31 am to
keep on dreaming trumpkin. no one outside of a select few know whats in that report, least of all you trumpkins.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
47847 posts
Posted on 3/24/19 at 8:37 am to
quote:

never said they were.


You said they could be. Truth is, you have no clue what they are investigating. You are ignorant.

quote:

they are going after crimes that will ruin the bone spurs on his foot if he can remember which one it is.


Sad.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram