- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Liberals, can you honestly justify the Mueller probe after Page/Ohr/Stzrok release?
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:25 am
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:25 am
You have the three people at the HEART of the investigation prior to and then during the Mueller appointment ADMITTING in front of a bipartisan Congressional committee that:
1) the information used to start the probe in uncorroborated and PAID FOR by the subject of the investigation's opponent
2) the information was gathered by the spouse of one of the lead investigators. a spouse with past ties to and intelligence agency with a director that openly despised the subject of the investigation
3) the unverified information was then used to gain a warrant to spy on the camp of a nominee for POTUS
4) exculpatory evidence was PURPOSELY withheld from the FISA court that would have rendered the search warrant invalid
5) the lead investigators ADMITTED they were the insurance policy should Trump win the election
6) not only was the original FISA granted with false information, it was RENEWED with the same false information.
7) the original subjects of the FISA warrant haven't even been charged with so much as jaywalking.
Set aside your acute TDS for a minute and give me ONE valid reason to justify this charade that's been perpetrated on the American public
1) the information used to start the probe in uncorroborated and PAID FOR by the subject of the investigation's opponent
2) the information was gathered by the spouse of one of the lead investigators. a spouse with past ties to and intelligence agency with a director that openly despised the subject of the investigation
3) the unverified information was then used to gain a warrant to spy on the camp of a nominee for POTUS
4) exculpatory evidence was PURPOSELY withheld from the FISA court that would have rendered the search warrant invalid
5) the lead investigators ADMITTED they were the insurance policy should Trump win the election
6) not only was the original FISA granted with false information, it was RENEWED with the same false information.
7) the original subjects of the FISA warrant haven't even been charged with so much as jaywalking.
Set aside your acute TDS for a minute and give me ONE valid reason to justify this charade that's been perpetrated on the American public
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:28 am to bamarep
I'm sure this will get many left responses
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:31 am to idlewatcher
I've been dragging my nuts across their foreheads all week with two or three threads a day reminding them how pathetic they are.
I bet I haven't gotten 10 responses from those knuckle dragging pussies all week.
I bet I haven't gotten 10 responses from those knuckle dragging pussies all week.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:33 am to bamarep
I do wish the left would be intellectually honest.
They skurry away from threads like these and frankly, I don't blame them. Just shows they aren't objective.
At all.
They skurry away from threads like these and frankly, I don't blame them. Just shows they aren't objective.
At all.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:33 am to bamarep
Sure they can justify it. They are deranged and thus can justify anything in their own mind.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:40 am to bamarep
1. So if Trump actually paid investigators to go to Hawaii and they found evidence that Obama wasn't born there, should that just be ignored because Trump paid for it?
2. Bruce Ohr was not an investigator, much less a "lead investigator".
3. There was a counter intelligence operation launched because they saw evidence that that Russia was trying to influence / infiltrate Trump's campaign. Shoot, every nominee should sign off on such investigations the day they announce they are running.
4-7. Muh FISA, I don't understand the defense of Carter Page.
2. Bruce Ohr was not an investigator, much less a "lead investigator".
3. There was a counter intelligence operation launched because they saw evidence that that Russia was trying to influence / infiltrate Trump's campaign. Shoot, every nominee should sign off on such investigations the day they announce they are running.
4-7. Muh FISA, I don't understand the defense of Carter Page.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:41 am to bamarep
What part of IT WAS HER F*CKING TURN don't you understand?
THAT, in a nutshell, is their entire justification.
THAT, in a nutshell, is their entire justification.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:43 am to mmcgrath
quote:
2. Bruce Ohr was not an investigator, much less a "lead investigator".
No, he was the go-between of the sHitlary campaign (through Perkins Coie/Fusion GPS/Nellie Ohr) and the MOST F*CKING POLITICALLY BIASED AND CORRUPT Odumbf*ck DOJ/FBI in history.
This post was edited on 3/15/19 at 11:44 am
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:50 am to mmcgrath
mcgrath, did you type that to the sound of "rubberband man" you sure twisting and contorting to try and justify this joke of an investigation.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:51 am to mmcgrath
quote:
because they saw evidence
I would hold that term loosely when referring to anything regarding Russian interference. The Trump tower meeting was a set up. What other "evidence" is out there?
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:52 am to mmcgrath
quote:
1. So if Trump actually paid investigators to go to Hawaii and they found evidence that Obama wasn't born there, should that just be ignored because Trump paid for it?
Please share the Trump/Russian collusion part we all must've missed. k Thanks.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:54 am to mmcgrath
quote:
4-7. Muh FISA, I don't understand the defense of Carter Page.
If you don’t understand why Carter Page was illegally spied upon how do you function in life being such a dumbass...you’re a waste of oxygen
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:57 am to mmcgrath
Its not a matter of found evidence, its a situation where FALSE EVIDENCE was created and planted and then used to unconstitutionally investigate a US citizen.
I hope you can understand that...
I hope you can understand that...
This post was edited on 3/15/19 at 12:36 pm
Posted on 3/15/19 at 9:58 am to mmcgrath
I’ll launch an investigation into you because someone was trying to break into your house
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:01 am to idlewatcher
quote:Manafort passing polling data to Russians, Stone and company reaching out to Wikileaks and predicting the release of Podesta e-mails. Trump sending campaign officials to Stone. Manafort's history. Carter Page's history. Papadopoulis mouthing off in London and trying to connect to Russians.
Please share the Trump/Russian collusion part we all must've missed. k Thanks.
I don't think there was enough for a conspiracy since the campaign was too dysfunctional to conspire with itself, but to say there wasn't enough evidence to start an investigation is just silly.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:03 am to MintBerry Crunch
quote:If I am running a business and it looks like one of my employees might be stealing from me, I would welcome an investigation. Same if it looks like there was a money laundering operation using one of my businesses.
I’ll launch an investigation into you because someone was trying to break into your house
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:03 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Manafort passing polling data to Russians, Stone and company reaching out to Wikileaks and predicting the release of Podesta e-mails. Trump sending campaign officials to Stone. Manafort's history. Carter Page's history. Papadopoulis mouthing off in London and trying to connect to Russians.
Holy frick your head is crazy
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:05 am to tigernchicago
quote:The investigation should find that out. Like an investigation started by someone filing a false police report. The biggest issue in this investigation was created by false testimony by everyone associated with Trump. They were lying to cover up interactions that weren't entirely criminal.
Its not a matter of ofund evidence, its a situation where FALSE EVIDENCE was created and planted and then used to unconstitutionally investigate a US citizen.
I hope you can understand that...
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:06 am to SDVTiger
quote:Holy frick you never make a solid argument.
Holy frick your head is crazy
Posted on 3/15/19 at 10:07 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Manafort passing polling data to Russians
You mean Ukrainians. And that is the big "collusion?"
quote:
Stone and company reaching out to Wikileaks and predicting the release of Podesta e-mails.
Everyone in the country knew when they were releasing more emails
quote:
Trump sending campaign officials to Stone
That's collusion? Which officials?
quote:
Manafort's history
Explain. Where's the collusion
quote:
Carter Page's history
Explain. Where's the collusion
quote:
Papadopoulis mouthing off in London and trying to connect to Russians.
Misfud was a Western intel asset, as said by his lawyer. 12 days in jail...not for collusion. GOT HIM! His exculpatory statements were withheld from the FISA court.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News