re: Liberals are responsible for 90% of all gun deaths in this country. What to do?

quote:

---

What evidence do you have that murderers in big cities are liberals

---

You're kidding I hope.

quote:

---

There should be a law against assault liberals

---

They think black semi auto rifles are the most dangerous so - oh wait - never mind

quote:

---

What evidence do you have that murderers in big cities are liberals?

---

going on voting patterns????

do you have any counter evidence that the 20% who vote GOP are committing the murders?? Or that the punks on the street who don't vote are more conservative than the general public??

quote:

---

What evidence do you have that murderers in big cities are liberals?

---

Common sense

Kill all liberals. Problem solved!

SOLUTION TO GUN CONTROL

In 1865, a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States.

In 1881, a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United States - who later died from the wound.

In 1963, a radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President of the United States.

In 1975, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.

In 1983, a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.

In 1984, James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a McDonald's restaurant.

In 1986, Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990, James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC office.

In 1991, George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby's cafeteria in Killeen, TX.

In 1995, James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999, Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.

In 2001, a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003, Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.

In 2007, a registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.

In 2010, a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011, a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012, Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.

In 2013, a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.

As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship yard.

Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.

SOLUTION:

It should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

We don't need gun control, we need Democrat control.
Guns don't kill people, Democrats do!

quote:

---

Liberals are responsible for 90% of all gun deaths in this country.

---

I know anecdotally this is likely true, but I'm curious if there are actual statistics that support this. Obviously liberals don't want to talk about black-on-black homicide, but they love to focus on "angry white male mass shooters" to support their skewed reality. I'd love to see a political breakdown of all shootings.

I'd be willing to bet conservatives account for a minuscule amount, but it'd be nice to see some numbers.

quote:

---

Yea...I'm sure gang bangers in cities show up to the polls. OP is a fricking idiot

---

You totally missed OP's point. It wasn't whether or not criminals vote, it's what should be done about criminals who commit gun violence, many of whom happen to be democrats. A fact actual voting Democrats like to ignore completely while pushing to punish law-abiding gun owners.

quote:

---

His point is poorly constructed and transparently full of shite.

---

Why don't you provide a better, more cogent counter-point then?

This has been proven inaccurate