Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Krystal Ball conflict of interest in RFK Jr interview

Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:20 pm
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10784 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:20 pm
Krystal and Saagar got notoriety with their Breaking Points show and going independent. Supposedly breaking away from big money, establishment forces, and so forth. She leans heavy left, he leans right.

Recently they had RFK Jr on their show. She caught a lot of grief because she was very unprofessional. She especially went after him about vaccines and covid stuff in general. It was a clown show.

Watching the Sabby Sabs channel, she had a video from Kim Iverson - who found out that during the pandemic, while Krystal was married to some guy (they are now divorced and Krystal is now married to Kyle Kuklinski(sp?)) - Krystal and her ex-husband had a company making software for things like distance / remote learning.

Krystal had a financial interest in things like the lockdowns and school closures. She was a huge advocate for them, and told people that kids might not ever get back in classrooms and things like that. RFK Jr was and is adamantly opposed to the lockdowns and keeping kids out of school. And Krystal went after him for the entirety of his covid positions, cut him off many times, and again, it was a clown show. She never disclosed her conflict of interest.

Passing this along - I was thinking this might be the type of thing that buries Krystal and her Breaking Points show. If she's been hiding this, what else has she been hiding? And if she gets exposed, what people and things might she be willing to roll over on and drag them down with her? People were very unhappy about her behavior and this conflict of interest could be a big deal in that sphere.

Just something to watch out for in case this controversy spreads. Krystal and Saagar have been guests on Rogan a couple times, maybe more. I wonder what his thoughts will be when he finds out.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
33807 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:35 pm to
Ball could still get it
Posted by LSUSUPERSTAR
TX
Member since Jan 2005
16298 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:43 pm to
Ball is a blue no matter who person even though she claims she isn't. Also her new man is a raging leftist. His interview with Rogan showed me all about him.

Saager is a moderate but leans more left than right. Hanging around the filth in DC had rubbed off on him.
This post was edited on 5/21/23 at 7:54 pm
Posted by Strannix
District 11
Member since Dec 2012
48807 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:44 pm to
Her arm definition is SKRONG
Posted by Lieutenant Dan
Euthanasia, USA
Member since Jan 2009
7152 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 6:44 pm to
Saw it. She basically interrupts him the entire time.

As shown, even "independent" podcasts get their talking points.


Posted by tenderfoot tigah
Red Stick
Member since Sep 2004
10373 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 7:14 pm to
Piss poor interview to interrupt the man like that.
Posted by BamaCoaster
God's Gulf
Member since Apr 2016
5248 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

Saager is a moderate but leans more left than right.


This is simply not true.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
27265 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 9:23 pm to
It's her an Saagar Engeti's show. So what if she has a conflict of interest?
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35914 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

So what if she has a conflict of interest?


Couldn't care less if she has a conflict of interest. Even then, I'm not sure it's still an actual conflict given that the lockdowns are over. However, her interview was embarrassing and her constant inability to allow RFK Jr to even respond to the questions was inexcusable. This wasn't an interview, it was a diatribe.
Posted by thebigmuffaletta
Member since Aug 2017
12793 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

This wasn't an interview, it was a diatribe.


This is pretty much how all interviews go when the interviewer is a leftist.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
78816 posts
Posted on 5/21/23 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Krystal had a financial interest in things like the lockdowns and school closures.


What financial interest? I don’t know this lady so it’s a serious question
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123745 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 5:30 am to
quote:

What financial interest?
Yeah. It's a reasonable question.

She had a financial interest in pushing remote learning while she was married to Jonathan Dariyanani during the pandemic. Apparently she did not disclose the conflict ... very dishonest.

At this point the "conflict of interest" is a little more murky though.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10784 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:21 am to
quote:

It's her an Saagar Engeti's show. So what if she has a conflict of interest?


It displays a lack of integrity and obfuscation of context and motives for the audience.

Krystal and her new husband are all-in for Marianne Williamson, and she is not on the same page as RFK Jr on these topics. They have recruited Marianne to run in this election. The time they spent with each candidate was markedly different in tenor and tone.

Krystal and Saagar have branded themselves as independent, free of these conflicts - what they're doing, or what she is doing - is openly deceptive. They complained about big money, big tech, big media et al shaping elections and manipulating voters - that's precisely what Krystal is doing right now.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10784 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:24 am to
quote:

I'm not sure it's still an actual conflict given that the lockdowns are over.


None of that stuff is over. That tweet the other day from the former Surgeon General made that clear. This form of governmental control will come back. We all know there will either be another pandemic or a resurgence of covid this winter.
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
10784 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 6:31 am to
quote:

At this point the "conflict of interest" is a little more murky though.


Does not seem murky to me at all. She wants the status quo with regard to snap decision lockdowns and closing classrooms - and she's interviewing candidates that have opinions on this, and if elected they will create policies, which might conflict with her financial stake in these issues. She sells her product - the media product - based on this supposed independence from external influences, implying she will give a fair shake to ideas, to candidates and so forth. But that is not the case at all.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8315 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:44 am to
Oh look, another “politician” lying through his teeth to try and convince us to hate each other. Dem playbook 101… good job being exactly same as the thing you claim to hate.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51317 posts
Posted on 5/22/23 at 7:47 am to
Except Ball and Sagrr (sp?) questioned vaccines on their show and took up for Iverson. They also repeatedly covered the lab leak theory and gave it serious credence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram