- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jury rules against dad trying to save his 7-year-old from gender ‘transition’
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:43 pm to DeusVultMachina
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:43 pm to DeusVultMachina
quote:No, I simply do not believe that the definition of child abuse should include the good faith pursuit of a recognized medical procedure which the parent believes to be in the best interest of the child.
You think child abuse should be decriminalized
Doubtless, you also believe that the state government should have the ability to prohibit parents from circumcising their male infants.
But please do continue misstating my positions. You seem to find it entertaining. Carry on.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:46 pm to AggieHank86
False equivalency.
Target missed.
Target missed.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:48 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, I simply do not believe that the definition of child abuse should include the good faith pursuit of a recognized medical procedure which the parent believes to be in the best interest of the child.
Sigh.
Still ignoring the grooming
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:48 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
No, I simply do not believe that the definition of child abuse should include the good faith pursuit of a recognized medical procedure which the parent believes to be in the best interest of the child.
LOL
The kid hasn't even hit puberty. There is absolutely zero good faith here. It's a forceful and irresponsible decision by the adults in this kids life.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:49 pm to ShortyRob
He is not ignoring it. Nothing these people do is unintentional.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:49 pm to AUsteriskPride
quote:She's groomed him for at least 4 years and then, used the NATURAL results of that grooming just justify being able to CONTINUE grooming him until she can castrate him.
The kid hasn't even hit puberty. There is absolutely zero good faith here. It's a forceful and irresponsible decision by the adults in this kids life.
=Not abuse only in clown world
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:50 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
do not believe that the definition of child abuse should include the good faith pursuit of a recognized medical procedure which the parent believes to be in the best interest of the child.
Quoted. You should do what we are all thinking you should do.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:50 pm to DeusVultMachina
I have just noticed that you and Shorty share a tendency to make two, three or four separate responses to the same post, and both of you have been posting at approximately the same times today on the same thread.
Maybe you ARE Shorty. Bwahaha
Maybe you ARE Shorty. Bwahaha
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:51 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
clown world
Bingo.
A place where communists masquerade as "libertarians"
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:51 pm to AggieHank86
Yeah, we are totes the same, like you and the Ohio communist
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:55 pm to AggieHank86
I aint logged off, go RA the IP addresses. Mods? Where you at? I must also be godfather1, waawaaweewah, gobux, sspaniel, and about 3 dozen others in the board. should I go on?
You are the gift that keeps on giving.
You are the gift that keeps on giving.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:56 pm to DeusVultMachina
quote:He doesn't actually think we're the same
I aint logged off, go RA the IP addresses. Mods? Where you at? I must also be godfather1, waawaaweewah, gobux, sspaniel, and about 3 dozen others in the board. should I go on?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:56 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
I have just noticed that you and Shorty share a tendency to make two, three or four separate responses to the same post, and both of you have been posting at approximately the same times today on the same thread.
Maybe you ARE Shorty. Bwahaha
I'm gonna quote this, fricker.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:57 pm to ShortyRob
I don't care. I know I have him.
Have exposed his child abuse supporting communist arse for quite awhile now for all to see.
Have exposed his child abuse supporting communist arse for quite awhile now for all to see.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:58 pm to AggieHank86
Speaking of alters, where is your tani account?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:00 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
Social conservatives, on the other hand, seem to feel utterly compelled to enforce their own morals upon those around them.
Tell me you’re not that stupid, especially after admitting you want the government involved in enforcing your values concerning clitorectomies.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:00 pm to ShortyRob
quote:You are really obsessed with this issue. I, on the other hand, have been trying to direct my discussion to the broader policy questions raised by this lawsuit.
Still ignoring the grooming
But by all means, let’s focus upon the minutia.
Is it possible that this mother of this child in this lawsuit has engaged in a pattern of attempting to create an environment in which this child will develop in a way for which this mother has a specific desire? Yes, that is certainly possible. It may even be probable.
By that definition, however, my own mother is guilty of child abuse abuse for sticking books in my hand From the time I was able to control my fingers. She wanted an academic, and she said out to create one.
Further, my father is guilty of child abuse for sticking a football in my hand at the same age. He wanted an athlete, and he set out to create one.
Is it possible that this woman wanted a daughter and set out to create one? Yes, that is certainly possible.
If I were on her jury and saw evidence to that effect, she would lose. That fact, however, has very little if any bearing upon the broader policy question of whether the coercive power of government should be utilized to prevent parental decision making regarding the health and welfare of their own children.
I have to say that this forum is perhaps the only place in the world that a person could be called a Marxist for thinking that a government should keep its nose out of people‘s private decision making.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:01 pm to DeusVultMachina
quote:Shorty, I have no idea where that person went.
Speaking of alters, where is your tani account?
Posted on 10/22/19 at 11:02 pm to AggieHank86
Hey tani. Stop defending child abuse and people won't @you
This post was edited on 10/22/19 at 11:02 pm
Popular
Back to top



6



