- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge transgender bathroom restrictions unconstitutional
Posted on 8/13/19 at 11:10 pm to Meauxjeaux
Posted on 8/13/19 at 11:10 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
I remember a time when people of that same school of thought would recoil at the idea of a group forcing it's views down others' throats.
When they felt like the neck under the boot they just wanted to stand up. Now they feel like the foot in the boot and want to keep pushing down.
0
Posted on 8/14/19 at 12:20 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Oh I just Can’t think of on secular reason not to allow gay marriage.
You haven’t had a coherent, A to B thought process in this thread yet. I salute you. You’d think it might happen once by accident. And yet you have avoided it.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 12:38 am to the808bass
You haven’t made an actual point in an reply to my posts.
I said There is 1st amendment grounds for gay marriage (or at least prohibiting establishment of one religions definition of marriage)
You laughed at the idea of marriage being a religious concept.
I pointed out there aren’t any secular reasons to prohibit gay marriage. Mostly to challenge you make a fricking point.
Which again you e sucked out of by not being able to follow A to B.
Youre mostly good as slinging insults and ducking making and kind of statement.
I said There is 1st amendment grounds for gay marriage (or at least prohibiting establishment of one religions definition of marriage)
You laughed at the idea of marriage being a religious concept.
I pointed out there aren’t any secular reasons to prohibit gay marriage. Mostly to challenge you make a fricking point.
Which again you e sucked out of by not being able to follow A to B.
Youre mostly good as slinging insults and ducking making and kind of statement.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 12:39 am to Turbeauxdog
And?
We used to prohibit a lot of things that we now realize should be allowed.
We used to prohibit a lot of things that we now realize should be allowed.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:54 am to SammyTiger
The commerce clause has never been dormant.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 6:18 am to the808bass
I don't get why the pro gay marriage crowd isn't fighting for polygamists marriage rights too.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 7:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
he unisex does seem like a reasonable accommodation.
Oh hell no - it is an UNREASONABLE IMPOSITION on normalcy.
SCREW this "accommodation" to spread mental illness. Bring back mental institutions where these freaks can be isolated from the rest of society ===> IF they continue to make demands to be "accommodated" by rational society.
If a person has some mental conflict but they find a way to cope with it that does not endanger the society at large, then let them live their lives in liberty and freedom like normal people.
But once the ADVERTISE that "I am mentally defective" and "I DEMAND that the rest of you participate in my mental FANTASY" THAT is the time to hustle them off to the same place you would if he demanded to be served an actual shite sandwich in a school cafeteria.
Enough of this stupidity.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 7:26 am
Posted on 8/14/19 at 7:49 am to TrueTiger
They don’t mind enforcing values as long as they agree with the values.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 8:09 am to SammyTiger
I don't believe it was ever prohibited, I'm only sure it was never prohibited in my lifetime.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:16 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
I don't believe it was ever prohibited, I'm only sure it was never prohibited in my lifetime.
What?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:30 am to SammyTiger
What's confusing? Gays haven't been prohibited from getting married.
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 9:31 am
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:35 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:How old are you? Three?
What's confusing? Gays haven't been prohibited from getting married
I don't believe it was ever prohibited, I'm only sure it was never prohibited in my lifetime.
DOMA
This post was edited on 8/14/19 at 9:57 am
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:38 am to AggieHank86
He’s going to respond with “they were always allowed to do it, it just wasn’t recognized” like that’s some kind of debating Kung fu.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:48 am to Jjdoc
quote:I grew up in the 60's watching The Jetsons. We thought we'd all be driving around in flying cars by now. Instead we're debating whether or not men can have periods and if boys can pee in the girl's restroom.
That's right. A federal judge just stated that schools MUST allow a student who identifies as another sex to use the bathroom they identify with.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 9:49 am to SammyTiger
You said prohibited, it never was.
Sorry reality doesn't align with your world view, but that's your problem not mine.
Sorry reality doesn't align with your world view, but that's your problem not mine.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 10:01 am to AggieHank86
quote:
How old are you? Three?
quote:
I view SoCons as little authoritarian despots ... constantly nursing tiny little hardons
Posted on 8/14/19 at 10:10 am to Turbeauxdog
Ok, but your getting into semantics and ignoring substance.
Which is childish.
Which is childish.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 10:12 am to L.A.
quote:
I grew up in the 60's watching The Jetsons. We thought we'd all be driving around in flying cars by now. Instead we're debating whether or not men can have periods and if boys can pee in the girl's restroom.
Shitty, isn't it.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 10:16 am to SammyTiger
quote:
Ok, but your getting into semantics and ignoring substance
No.
Prohibition is a restriction of freedom.
Lack of subsidy is a completely different concept, and it's critical to accurately draw that distinction.
To say it was prohibited is ridiculous.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 10:19 am to Turbeauxdog
Except when homosexuality itself was prohibited, but yeah I guess Laws that specifically don’t recognize it don’t prohibit anyone from saying they’re married.
Thank you for pointing that out.
Thank you for pointing that out.
Page 10 of 11
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News