Started By
Message

Judge rules Maine can bar religious exemptions to health care vaccine mandate

Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:51 pm
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15108 posts
Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:51 pm
quote:

A U.S. District judge on Wednesday ruled that Maine could prohibit religious exemptions to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.


quote:

Maine got rid of religious and philosophical exemptions in vaccine mandates in 2019. Other states such as California, Mississippi and West Virginia also do not allow for religious or philosophical exemptions to vaccine mandates.


quote:

Matt Staver of the Christian advocacy group Liberty Counsel, which is representing the workers, said, “All Maine healthcare workers have the legal right to request reasonable accommodation for their sincerely held religious beliefs and forcing COVID shots without exemptions is unlawful."

Liberty Counsel has already filed an appeal of the ruling in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and has asked that the ruling be put on hold, Reuters reported.


LINK

Would would think this is in violation with religious liberties. Hopefully the Liberty Counsel is successful in their appeal.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
94676 posts
Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:55 pm to
If this is in conflict between different circuits, it is on the way to SCOTUS.

And if it is, it should mean an injunction between now and the case because one can claim irreparable harm between now and when the case is decided if you force someone to take the vaccination.
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15108 posts
Posted on 10/13/21 at 11:05 pm to
Liberty Counsel has already filed an appeal of the ruling in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, so hopefully it will be put on hold. I hope this gets to the SCOTUS ASAP.
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27229 posts
Posted on 10/13/21 at 11:10 pm to
InB4 Maine Justice
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30225 posts
Posted on 10/13/21 at 11:18 pm to
fricking political judges are the worst.

And… I know it goes both ways.
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
11872 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 1:43 am to
Usually only goes one way with these activist judges.
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 2:12 am to
quote:

If this is in conflict between different circuits, it is on the way to SCOTUS.


It certainly seems to be in conflict with the ruling in New York from the other day
Posted by RickDorf
Nothing to prove Nothing to lose
Member since Jan 2021
3294 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 6:04 am to
quote:

fricking political judges are the worst.

And… I know it goes both ways.


This
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
16448 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 6:08 am to
quote:

Maine Justice


First thing that popped in my mind.
Posted by TigerStripes30
Alexandria, LA
Member since Dec 2011
6367 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 7:52 am to
quote:

Judge rules Maine can bar religious exemptions to health care vaccine mandate


the thing is you cant...
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Judge Jon D. Levy


Thanks Obama
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
58853 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;



I really don’t know how more clear one has to be that government on any level is clearly restricted within it’s powers to prohibit one from following their own religious conscience when it comes to injecting a foreign substance into their own bodies.

AND YET, our own Constitution has no power compared to corrupted US district judges who rule by decree rather than by the Constitution (Law Of The Land)




Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67534 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:12 am to


That actually is in line with the 1990 Peyote case SCOTUS ruled that the 1A didn't protect the religious users of Peyote from state rules.

I think Scalia wrote the opinion.
Posted by back9Tiger
Mandeville, LA.
Member since Nov 2005
14126 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:12 am to
Sick and tired of activist judges.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
4945 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:32 am to
Please explain TrueTiger
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67534 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 10:11 am to

It's been a while but if I remember the case there were a couple of Native Americans that were denied state benefits because they tested positive for Peyote.

They said that they used Peyote due to their religion and that the state rule conflicted with their 1A rights.

SCOTUS said no (and Scalia wrote it), sorry but the law was basically neutral and just because it made it a little harder for someone to practice their religion it didn't cross the 1A.
Posted by oldskule
Down South
Member since Mar 2016
15476 posts
Posted on 10/14/21 at 10:19 am to
quote:

fricking political judges are the worst.


Judges are the most powerful officials that most know nothing about....and lots of judges go political for financial reasons.

If you research, judges do not make a big salary, but they make a lot of money, get my drift?

POLITICS ARE LUCRATIVE!
This post was edited on 10/14/21 at 10:21 am
Posted by Bamatab
Member since Jan 2013
15108 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 8:39 pm to
Looks like U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the appeal. Today Liberty Counsel filed an emergency injunction pending appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Unfortunately it went to Breyer for review.

LINK

quote:

Liberty Counsel filed an emergency injunction pending appeal (IPA) to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of more than 2,000 health care workers against Governor Janet Mills, health officials of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and five of Maine’s largest hospital systems. The IPA went to Justice Stephen Breyer for review.


quote:

Liberty Counsel is asking the High Court to rule that: 1) Governor Mills will not enforce her unconstitutional mandate so that plaintiff John Doe 1 must force his employees to receive a COVID-19 injection and not provide a religious exemption or accommodation for his employees in violation of his and their sincerely held religious beliefs; 2) Defendants will immediately cease in their refusal to consider, review, and grant plaintiffs’ requests for religious exemption and accommodation from the governor’s “COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate,” provided that plaintiffs agree to abide by reasonable accommodation provisions such as masking, testing, symptom monitoring and reporting; and 3) Defendants will immediately cease threatening to discharge and terminate plaintiffs from their employment for failure to accept a COVID-19 “vaccine” that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs.
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29639 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 10:40 pm to
it is getting really close to the time we need to have an actual war

this shite has gotten way too far out of hand

we are fighting against pure, unadulterated evil
This post was edited on 10/18/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted by texridder
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Oct 2017
14164 posts
Posted on 10/18/21 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Sick and tired of activist judges.

Every time there is ruling you Trumpers diagree with, there is an immediate and reactionary cry about activist judges.

What makes this an activist judicial decision?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram