- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Judge rules Maine can bar religious exemptions to health care vaccine mandate
Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:51 pm
Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:51 pm
quote:
A U.S. District judge on Wednesday ruled that Maine could prohibit religious exemptions to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers.
quote:
Maine got rid of religious and philosophical exemptions in vaccine mandates in 2019. Other states such as California, Mississippi and West Virginia also do not allow for religious or philosophical exemptions to vaccine mandates.
quote:
Matt Staver of the Christian advocacy group Liberty Counsel, which is representing the workers, said, “All Maine healthcare workers have the legal right to request reasonable accommodation for their sincerely held religious beliefs and forcing COVID shots without exemptions is unlawful."
Liberty Counsel has already filed an appeal of the ruling in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and has asked that the ruling be put on hold, Reuters reported.
LINK
Would would think this is in violation with religious liberties. Hopefully the Liberty Counsel is successful in their appeal.
Posted on 10/13/21 at 10:55 pm to Bamatab
If this is in conflict between different circuits, it is on the way to SCOTUS.
And if it is, it should mean an injunction between now and the case because one can claim irreparable harm between now and when the case is decided if you force someone to take the vaccination.
And if it is, it should mean an injunction between now and the case because one can claim irreparable harm between now and when the case is decided if you force someone to take the vaccination.
Posted on 10/13/21 at 11:05 pm to teke184
Liberty Counsel has already filed an appeal of the ruling in the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, so hopefully it will be put on hold. I hope this gets to the SCOTUS ASAP.
Posted on 10/13/21 at 11:18 pm to Bamatab
fricking political judges are the worst.
And… I know it goes both ways.
And… I know it goes both ways.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 1:43 am to loogaroo
Usually only goes one way with these activist judges.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 2:12 am to teke184
quote:
If this is in conflict between different circuits, it is on the way to SCOTUS.
It certainly seems to be in conflict with the ruling in New York from the other day
Posted on 10/14/21 at 6:04 am to loogaroo
quote:
fricking political judges are the worst.
And… I know it goes both ways.
This
Posted on 10/14/21 at 6:08 am to NPComb
quote:
Maine Justice
First thing that popped in my mind.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 7:52 am to Bamatab
quote:
Judge rules Maine can bar religious exemptions to health care vaccine mandate
the thing is you cant...
Posted on 10/14/21 at 7:54 am to Bamatab
quote:
Judge Jon D. Levy
Thanks Obama
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:04 am to Bamatab
quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
I really don’t know how more clear one has to be that government on any level is clearly restricted within it’s powers to prohibit one from following their own religious conscience when it comes to injecting a foreign substance into their own bodies.
AND YET, our own Constitution has no power compared to corrupted US district judges who rule by decree rather than by the Constitution (Law Of The Land)
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:12 am to Bamatab
That actually is in line with the 1990 Peyote case SCOTUS ruled that the 1A didn't protect the religious users of Peyote from state rules.
I think Scalia wrote the opinion.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 8:12 am to Bamatab
Sick and tired of activist judges.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 10:11 am to jp4lsu
It's been a while but if I remember the case there were a couple of Native Americans that were denied state benefits because they tested positive for Peyote.
They said that they used Peyote due to their religion and that the state rule conflicted with their 1A rights.
SCOTUS said no (and Scalia wrote it), sorry but the law was basically neutral and just because it made it a little harder for someone to practice their religion it didn't cross the 1A.
Posted on 10/14/21 at 10:19 am to loogaroo
quote:
fricking political judges are the worst.
Judges are the most powerful officials that most know nothing about....and lots of judges go political for financial reasons.
If you research, judges do not make a big salary, but they make a lot of money, get my drift?
POLITICS ARE LUCRATIVE!
This post was edited on 10/14/21 at 10:21 am
Posted on 10/18/21 at 8:39 pm to Bamatab
Looks like U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the appeal. Today Liberty Counsel filed an emergency injunction pending appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Unfortunately it went to Breyer for review.
LINK
LINK
quote:
Liberty Counsel filed an emergency injunction pending appeal (IPA) to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of more than 2,000 health care workers against Governor Janet Mills, health officials of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services, Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention and five of Maine’s largest hospital systems. The IPA went to Justice Stephen Breyer for review.
quote:
Liberty Counsel is asking the High Court to rule that: 1) Governor Mills will not enforce her unconstitutional mandate so that plaintiff John Doe 1 must force his employees to receive a COVID-19 injection and not provide a religious exemption or accommodation for his employees in violation of his and their sincerely held religious beliefs; 2) Defendants will immediately cease in their refusal to consider, review, and grant plaintiffs’ requests for religious exemption and accommodation from the governor’s “COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate,” provided that plaintiffs agree to abide by reasonable accommodation provisions such as masking, testing, symptom monitoring and reporting; and 3) Defendants will immediately cease threatening to discharge and terminate plaintiffs from their employment for failure to accept a COVID-19 “vaccine” that violates their sincerely held religious beliefs.
Posted on 10/18/21 at 10:40 pm to Bamatab
it is getting really close to the time we need to have an actual war
this shite has gotten way too far out of hand
we are fighting against pure, unadulterated evil
this shite has gotten way too far out of hand
we are fighting against pure, unadulterated evil
This post was edited on 10/18/21 at 11:33 pm
Posted on 10/18/21 at 11:08 pm to back9Tiger
quote:
Sick and tired of activist judges.
Every time there is ruling you Trumpers diagree with, there is an immediate and reactionary cry about activist judges.
What makes this an activist judicial decision?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News