- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:41 am to SDVTiger
quote:
quote:
Harry is uber libertarian
So the worst of the worst
what an idiot you are
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:51 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
ITS NOT SPEECH IT IS FOR HIS CONDUCT. WHY CANT YOU MORONS COMPREHEND THIS!
I can comprehend it. I would just like someone to post a link (any link) showing "conduct" that rises to the level of deportation.
I can't find one single thing showing open support for Hamas, or any criminal activity at all. No criminal charges have been filed against him, by either Columbia University or these Jewish students he's alleged to have abused. He never illegally occupied a building and only acted as a mediator by the people who did and University administration.
Other than being a general disturber of the peace and a fricking loudmouth. What else is there?
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:55 am to Pandy Fackler
Did Little Marco PNG him?
Posted on 3/11/25 at 8:55 am to AggieHank86
You’re wrong Hank.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:02 am to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
what an idiot you are
Says a libertarian
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:03 am to AggieHank86
quote:
quote:A green card can be taken away at any moment by immigration for ANY reason!!
I’m sorry, I wasn’t aware that you like me, were the recipient of a green card. Or that INS specifically lets you know exactly this words when you go thru the process.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:22 am to BobBoucher
quote:
Examples of Security Violations
Membership in Terrorist Organizations:
Being part of or assisting a terrorist group can lead to immediate revocation and deportation.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:37 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I consider the Constitution of the United States to be quite a worthy hill.
Nothing about the removal is unconstitutional, Hank. Stop lying.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:40 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
This fricking guy isn't going anywhere
Wanna bet?
Posted on 3/11/25 at 9:44 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
Other than being a general disturber of the peace and a fricking loudmouth. What else is there?
Well, I'd suggest that the more hardcore terrorist supporters are the ones that know the line. If you're supportive of Hamas and just a really pissed off college student, you'll cross that line. You don't have as much to lose. The hardcore guys don't want too much attention, so they toe the line. They don't exactly advertise or hand out business cards.
Don't take this as I'm condoning arrest and removal of some loudmouth, if that's all it is. I'm just offering the other side of the argument. However, if the wrong loudmouth stumbles into the wrong neighborhood and gets smacked around a little bit for being anti-US, I might be OK with that.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:01 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
acted as a mediator by the people who did and University administration.
That’s all that is needed. He gone.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:07 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
What are the national security concerns implicated here?
Not having America become a Nation over run with Muslim terrorists who have ZERO recognition of LAW and want all Non-Muslims dead.
For examples, see Europe
Posted on 3/11/25 at 10:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Let’s say, just for the sake of discussion, that all of this is true. Please show us where Mahmood Khalil participated directly in any of these activities Because Trump is not trying to deport some random, hypothetical “protester.“ He is trying to deport that specific individual. In my vision of America, the federal government only brings its hammer down upon people for things that they actually did, not for some crowdsourced fantasy.
Go look at the actually statutes...
quote:
8 USC 1182
(B) Terrorist activities
Any alien who is described in subparagraph (B) or (F) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable
quote:
8 USC 1227
B) Terrorist activities (i) In general Any alien who- (I) has engaged in a terrorist activity; (II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv)); (III) has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity; (IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of- (aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or (bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity; (V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi); (VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization; (VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization; (VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or (IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years, is inadmissible. An alien who is an officer, official, representative, or spokesman of the Palestine Liberation Organization is considered, for purposes of this chapter, to be engaged in a terrorist activity
This has been this way since 2005 and has been used this way in the past. Note that no “material” support of terrorism needs to be alleged, and no formal crime must be committed. Mere speech suffices. No due process, only "reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry".
It is not very difficult to come up with "a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity" as defined as "(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization"
This post was edited on 3/11/25 at 10:14 am
Posted on 3/11/25 at 11:08 am to Harry Rex Vonner
quote:
free speech is free speech
First - free speech is a bit of an illusion
Second - to the extent it exists, its full privilege should be reserved for citizens.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 11:09 am to Pandy Fackler
Amazing how many people don't know that it specifically asks on green card status "Do you support any anti-american extremists" (not exactly language) and they clearly lied here. Deport.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 11:11 am to Bunk Moreland
Impeach that f*ggot and make sure he never serves in a court again
Posted on 3/11/25 at 11:49 am to Bunk Moreland
Round them up and have them camp out in the Judge's Lawn. If they leave the property ship them to Haiti.
Posted on 3/11/25 at 12:14 pm to Arkaea79
quote:
Amazing how many people don't know that it specifically asks on green card status "Do you support any anti-american extremists" (not exactly language) and they clearly lied here. Deport.
How do you know he lied though? I can't find anything that says he supported Hamas. Now he supported Palestinians and is vocally anti-Isreal, but is that the same as supporting "anti-American extremism"?
This post was edited on 3/11/25 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 3/11/25 at 12:20 pm to Pandy Fackler
You do realize that Hamas is a designated terrorist organization and all of these protests would therefore fall into the criteria of reasonably suspect that they support a terrorist organization.
Once again, it doesn’t have to be material support.
Once again, it doesn’t have to be material support.
Page 7 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News