- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Journal fires editor after publishing research refuting ‘warming climate’
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:28 am
Tl;dr
·Marty Rowland is no longer a special editor at the American Journal of Economics and Sociology after he published a paper challenging mainstream climate change narratives.
·The paper, titled 'Carbon dioxide and a warming climate are not problems,' faced immediate calls for retraction, its authors told The College Fix.
·Scholars expressed concerns about a trend of censorship and retaliation against researchers who question prevailing climate science, asserting that dissenting opinions are increasingly marginalized.
the college fix
·Marty Rowland is no longer a special editor at the American Journal of Economics and Sociology after he published a paper challenging mainstream climate change narratives.
·The paper, titled 'Carbon dioxide and a warming climate are not problems,' faced immediate calls for retraction, its authors told The College Fix.
·Scholars expressed concerns about a trend of censorship and retaliation against researchers who question prevailing climate science, asserting that dissenting opinions are increasingly marginalized.
quote:
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology recently removed special editor Marty Rowland from his position for publishing a paper refuting climate change argument about carbon dioxide, according to the paper’s authors.
“The standard response of the mainstream climate science community these days to papers that somewhat challenge the CO2-is-dangerous-narrative is to immediately ask for retraction,” Marcel Crok, a co-author of the paper and director of the climate science group Clintel, told The College Fix.
“It’s a strategy because it gives the signal that the paper is really bad and most people don’t have the time and knowledge to assess the situation,” Crok said in an email Tuesday.
The paper in question, “Carbon dioxide and a warming climate are not problems,” was published in the journal in May 2024. Crok co-authored it with Andy May, a retired petrophysicist and developmental geologist who worked for Exxon and other oil and energy companies.
Rowland, a lecturer at the Henry George School of Science and environmental engineer, was the editor at the journal who approved it.
According to May’s blog, the journal fired Rowland in August, and the reason it gave was “his publication of our paper.”
An archived version of the journal editorial board webpage shows Rowland was the special editions editor at least since 2023. The current page no longer lists him as an editor.
The Fix reached out to Rowland and the editorial team at the American Journal of Economics and Sociology several times by email over the past two weeks to ask about his role at the journal and the reason for his departure. None responded.
Since being published, the paper has been cited 25 times according to google scholar, and scientists David Wojick, Kenneth Richard, and H. Sterling Burnett gave positive reviews, according to May’s blog.
“In short there was no legitimate reason to fire Dr. Rowland for publishing our fully peer-reviewed, and well received, paper,” May wrote.
May told The Fix via email this week that the paper was peer-reviewed prior to publication.
“The two scientists that liked the paper, both are very famous scientists with decades of climate science publications and well over 16,000 citations between them, had many suggestions and I made all their suggested changes to the paper and the changes improved the paper a lot,” May said.
“Post-publication, the response was mostly favorable, but there was a lot of published criticism,” he told The Fix. “But, these critical responses to our paper are swamped by the favorable critiques. The paper is very popular and in the top 0.1% of all papers followed by Wiley… It is also the #2 paper published in AJES.”
Crok told The Fix that others responded to its publication with calls for retraction.
However, May said none of the critics “identified any errors” in their article, which is why it hasn’t been retracted.
the college fix
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:32 am to L.A.
Man-made climate change is a huge hoax. Forty years ago the media said coastal cities would be underwater.
The Earth has been through five ice ages. Theoretically, you can't have an ice age without a warming stage preceding it.
The Earth has been through five ice ages. Theoretically, you can't have an ice age without a warming stage preceding it.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:32 am to L.A.
Wow. I had some really great science teachers and professors. We were taught that you’re supposed to research and shite, not fire people you don’t agree with.
To me this is one more nail in the coffin. If they were confident in their science they would just refute it with their own paper.
To me this is one more nail in the coffin. If they were confident in their science they would just refute it with their own paper.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:33 am to L.A.
The climate change rhetoric was created to make clean energy investors millions... When someone posts scientific findings that prove anything other than 'earth is dying', it puts those investors at risk, so the findings disappear.
This post was edited on 9/17/25 at 10:34 am
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:36 am to zadams_318
There is a lot of money in the hoax business.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:36 am to zadams_318
quote:
created to make clean energy investors millions
This. Solar and wind are complete farces.
Anyone who actually CARED about the climate would jump on the Prof David Ruzik train and get nuclear.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:38 am to TFH
quote:
This. Solar and wind are complete farces.
In many ways, they are environmental nightmares.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:38 am to L.A.
quote:
The 2025 Atlantic hurricane season is predicted to be above normal, with warm Atlantic sea surface temperatures and neutral or transitioning La Niña conditions favoring hurricane development. While specific numbers vary, leading organizations like Colorado State University and NOAA forecast around 16-18 named storms, 8-9 hurricanes, and 3-4 major hurricanes, with a higher-than-average chance of a major hurricane making landfall on the Gulf Coast and the U.S.
Global warming my arse. Yet the scientists will tell us they can't be certain because we are talking Mother Nature events here. Duh.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:39 am to TrueTiger
There is a lot of power and control in the hoax business.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:39 am to L.A.
The climate zealot and academia apologists will point out the inane criticisms of their compatriots and say the firing was justified.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:42 am to L.A.
So he printed a peer-reviewed research paper which went contrary to the popular narrative and was punished for it?
Sounds COVIDly familiar...
Sounds COVIDly familiar...
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:47 am to TFH
quote:
This. Solar and wind are complete farces.
My uncle got an engineering degree in the early 80s. StRted his own solar business and did really well for years.....u til the investor money ran dry and the company folded.
He worked for some big companies for a while (non solar) and then started a new company around 2010 and made a shitload of money. The company didnt turn a profit but your tax dollars financed the board of directors dream homes.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 10:49 am to L.A.
The whole thing is a hoax perpetrated by the CCP. Give the Chinese credit. They play the long game. They invented this nonsense to get the West to destroy their economies. All the while, the Chinese build coal fired power plants and build up their industry.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 11:05 am to L.A.
Imagine getting fired for reporting facts...
Posted on 9/17/25 at 11:24 am to how333
quote:
can't have an ice age without a warming stage preceding it.
cannot be emphasized often enough - I''ve been refuting this garbage for decades = we are still recovering from the last Ice Age.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 11:35 am to zadams_318
quote:
The climate change rhetoric was created to make clean energy investors millions.
Nope! Clean energy investors were the tax payers. The Middle men were the contractors, who passed a good portion of the Largesse to politicians.
See Obama, Al Gore, and others, bank accounts and mansions.
Posted on 9/17/25 at 11:44 am to L.A.
This is actual Cancel Culture; firing someone who celebrates the political assassination of a fellow American citizen is not. There's a difference.
Popular
Back to top


15









