- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jennifer Rubin: Taking the Fifth should disqualify a politician from taking office
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:13 am to OMLandshark
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:13 am to OMLandshark
Don't these people believe in democracy?
Let the voters decide.
Why are these people so frightened of voters?
The press are the great defenders of democracy!
Let the people decide Trump's fate.
Gee, makes you wonder why are they so intent on preventing a Trump candidacy.
Let the voters decide.
Why are these people so frightened of voters?
The press are the great defenders of democracy!
Let the people decide Trump's fate.
Gee, makes you wonder why are they so intent on preventing a Trump candidacy.
0
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:15 am to OMLandshark
So, we are cool with insider trading, but taking the 5th is the line.
Good to know.
Good to know.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:15 am to OMLandshark
Dems hate the constitution.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:16 am to OMLandshark
Leftists get to make all sorts of arbitrary rules that they're exempt from.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:16 am to OMLandshark
And MSM ‘Journalists’ as well.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:16 am to OMLandshark
What other rights are not afforded to politicians?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:17 am to OMLandshark
IWNHI
The hate has consumed her, to the exclusion of all else. If OMB died, she would instantly become an empty husk. The tunnel vision is skrong, and all-consuming with this one
The hate has consumed her, to the exclusion of all else. If OMB died, she would instantly become an empty husk. The tunnel vision is skrong, and all-consuming with this one
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:18 am to OMLandshark
Serious question: Do women reach a certain age and start losing their fking minds?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:20 am to OMLandshark
Let’s just say Talcum X has more credibility speaking for the black point of view than Jennifer Rubin does speaking for the conservative point of view.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:21 am to OMLandshark
I must disagree with Ms. Rubin.
Exercising a Constitutional right should NEVER disqualify a person from seeking elective office.
On the other hand, there is nothing to prevent the electorate from considering that action when casting their votes, just as is the case with the negative inference in civil litigation.
Exercising a Constitutional right should NEVER disqualify a person from seeking elective office.
On the other hand, there is nothing to prevent the electorate from considering that action when casting their votes, just as is the case with the negative inference in civil litigation.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:22 am to OMLandshark
Abject stupidity should disqualify someone from being a journalist.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:23 am to OMLandshark
So exercising a constitutional right should be grounds for disqualification. 
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:26 am to LSUnation78
quote:Let's ignore that Trump said the same thing in 2016.
Tying themselves in knots to convince you that Trump is disqualified.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:27 am to OMLandshark
quote:
Jennifer Rubin
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:29 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Let's ignore that Trump said the same thing in 2016.
He did not. He said it means you are guilty. Not that you should be disqualified. Also, I’m sure trump regrets that statement now that he is aware that the fbi will lie to try and convict. I am amazed how y’all are falling for this again. It’s the fisa app pee pee dossier all over again. Are you so blinded by political affiliation to acknowledge that?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:30 am to AggieHank86
quote:
On the other hand, there is nothing to prevent the electorate from considering that action when casting their votes, just as is the case with the negative inference in civil litigation.
Can we also have a negative inference if a party to the litigation has lied and falsified info in the past?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:31 am to OMLandshark
It's like they don't even know a Constitution exists.
At least when it's convenient for them to not know it exists.
At least when it's convenient for them to not know it exists.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:31 am to OMLandshark
Using a constitionally protected right should disqualify yoiu from political office? It makes no sense on the face of it.
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:32 am to OMLandshark
Wow, I thought pleading the 5th was covered in the constitution?
Posted on 8/17/22 at 11:32 am to OMLandshark
welp, It is in the constitution but apparently the constitution is becoming an optional things for Ls
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News