- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:43 pm to The Spleen
quote:
How soon before Gowdy is mentioned as a possible 2016 Presidential candidate for the GOP?
Not soon enough
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:44 pm to darkhorse
quote:Within 2 days of last November? You know, when this press conference was held...
Media storm on Gowdy within 2 days. He just made all those who like Obama will go after him 100%.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:45 pm to Decatur
quote:you thought that was funny?
Well if he knows all of the answers to the questions he's asking, why are we still having an investigation then?
really?
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:47 pm to NC_Tigah
I'm laughing at the Gowdy fanboyism that has engulfed this board
It is funny
It is funny
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:50 pm to Decatur
We need to have an expectations thread at some point. Let's put everyone on record as to what they're expecting and what will constitute a "successful" investigation.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 4:59 pm to boosiebadazz
I agree
What else are we trying to figure out in all of this?
What else are we trying to figure out in all of this?
This post was edited on 5/12/14 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:01 pm to Decatur
an indictment?
a resignation?
crucifying Hillary up in to the 2015 campaign season?
Are there objective standards to what will constitute a successfull investigation by the committee?
a resignation?
crucifying Hillary up in to the 2015 campaign season?
Are there objective standards to what will constitute a successfull investigation by the committee?
This post was edited on 5/12/14 at 5:03 pm
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:04 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
Are there objective standards to what will constitute a successfull investigation by the committee?
Any Republicans here have any thoughts on this? Anyone?
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:08 pm to Decatur
I would be satisfied if someone just admitted they used the video as an excuse
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:12 pm to Decatur
quote:Why?
I'm laughing at the Gowdy fanboyism that has engulfed this board
He seems like a capable lawyer to me.
Not to you?
This post was edited on 5/12/14 at 5:17 pm
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:16 pm to fleaux
quote:
I would be satisfied if someone just admitted they used the video as an excuse
Why?
The people at the compound that night were citing the video/insult to Mohammad. Ansar al-Sharia cited the same the next day. AQAP and AQIM issued press releases days later citing basically the same.
With all of that, what are you going to think?
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:18 pm to pistolpete23
Behngazi.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:18 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Why?
Because compared to the sack riding Obama fanboys they are amateurs.
It is funny if you think about it.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:20 pm to Decatur
quote:The American survivors? Otherwise is does not matter.
The people at the compound that night
quote:There is not a scintilla of evidence those "people at the compound" were ACTUALLY at the compound.
The people at the compound that night were citing the video/insult to Mohammad
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:21 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Why?
Let's just say I'm not particularly impressed with the guy.
I find him prone to theatrical outbursts based on factual and sometimes legal misunderstandings.
Maybe he can keep it under control this time, we'll see.
This post was edited on 5/12/14 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:25 pm to Decatur
quote:If I am a CIA operative, I am going to think AQAP and AQIM are two of the least reliable information sources on the planet. I am going to think before I remotely consider stooping to that standard, I'm damn sure going to interview my own eyewitnesses.
With all of that, what are you going to think?
What is the testimony of the latter???
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:26 pm to Decatur
quote:Examples?
I find him prone to theatrical outbursts based on factual and sometimes legal misunderstandings.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:27 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
There is not a scintilla of evidence those "people at the compound" were ACTUALLY at the compound.
Explain what you mean by "evidence" because there were definitely people at the compound that night citing the video/insult to Mohammad.
Posted on 5/12/14 at 5:28 pm to Rex
quote:That just might be the most intelligent thing Rex has ever uttered.
Ooooo..... Gowdy Doody Pinhead has much bravad
Page 6 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News