View in: Desktop
Copyright @2023 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?
Posted by OU Guy
on 1/19/23 at 12:39 pm
7
3Edit: My meaning by flat tax is a sales/consumption tax, pay tax as you buy shite.
I like the concept of flat tax and do away with income tax plus the IRS. Think of all the rich people they pay little tax due to loop holes. Drug dealers money is not reported so untaxed. If flat tax then people pay tax based on how much they buy. But you keep all your money until spent.
Lots of finer details would have to be worked out but overall I think a flat tax would get higher income folks to pay more of our taxes since they can buy jets and fancy cars and mansions.
Maybe have first $1k of rent non taxed. Groceries non taxed. Would take a huge education campaign too.
Not sure how states would handle it, would they keep income tax or go flat and add on?
What say you?
I like the concept of flat tax and do away with income tax plus the IRS. Think of all the rich people they pay little tax due to loop holes. Drug dealers money is not reported so untaxed. If flat tax then people pay tax based on how much they buy. But you keep all your money until spent.
Lots of finer details would have to be worked out but overall I think a flat tax would get higher income folks to pay more of our taxes since they can buy jets and fancy cars and mansions.
Maybe have first $1k of rent non taxed. Groceries non taxed. Would take a huge education campaign too.
Not sure how states would handle it, would they keep income tax or go flat and add on?
What say you?
This post was edited on 1/19 at 12:47 pm
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by RogerTheShrubber 
on 1/19/23 at 12:40 pm to OU Guy
on 1/19/23 at 12:40 pm to OU GuyConsumption tax.
quote:
Maybe have first $1k of rent non taxed. Groceries non taxed. Would take a huge education campaign too.
No. Once you open the door to exemptions you introduce lobbyists and bribes to the game and you give congress the power that you're trying to take away from them.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by OU Guy on 1/19/23 at 12:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
on 1/19/23 at 12:42 pm to RogerTheShrubberquote:
Consumption tax.
Yes, thats what I’m saying. Sales tax flat tax consumption tax all the same meaning to me. Pay as you go. Lower earners would pay less tax as they buy less. Higher pay more since they buy more shite.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by jimjackandjose on 1/19/23 at 12:43 pm to Flats
Consumption tax no exemptions. Perhaps consumption tax on non necessities. Similar to flood. Food isn't taxed.
Farmers about to be fricked though.
Farmers about to be fricked though.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by LolStarFishlol on 1/19/23 at 12:44 pm to OU Guy
on 1/19/23 at 12:44 pm to OU GuyConsumption tax, if I don’t want to pay taxes for a certain month, just don’t buy shite. The rich can’t run from their taxes, as they are always buying shite. Businesses can’t run from their taxes because all of their inventory will be taxed.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by FATBOY TIGER on 1/19/23 at 12:46 pm to OU Guy
Not one cent till they pass a reasonable budget voted on by property owning Americans.
My idea would be to set it at 17% FOR EVERYBODY and work within those constraints like me and my family does.
My idea would be to set it at 17% FOR EVERYBODY and work within those constraints like me and my family does.
TD Sponsor
TD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
TD FanUSA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
to EveryoneAdvertisement
quote:
Flat tax and national retail sales tax in place of income tax are two entirely different matters.
I fricked up saying flat. I mean sales and pay as you go but the rate is same for all. Its flat but via sales.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by Hopeful Doc on 1/19/23 at 12:52 pm to RTN
on 1/19/23 at 12:52 pm to RTNquote:
Instead of a consumption tax, why not just make income tax flat instead of progressive. Then everyone pays the same rate.
The argument is that this tax disproportionately affects those with low income, and it is fairly undeniably true that this is the case (13% of 10,000 is a lot harder to let go of than 13% of $100,000 and is a lot harder to let go of than 13% of $1,000,000 in terms of making ends meet and pretty much any conceivable quality of life metric when we look at how the current system impacts those in the lower income ranges)).
The argument for flat tax says, “it’s ok because this is fair”
The argument against says, “ok, maybe some deductions are ok, and maybe we should have a more tax-heavy system”
Throw on about 100 years of the thought in the latter, and we are at today. It’s also the reason that tax cuts disproportionately “help” the “rich”- when the bottom 50% pays essentially nothing in taxes, it’s hard to give them more money by not charging them a smaller percentage of nothing.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by notsince98 
on 1/19/23 at 12:53 pm to OU Guy
on 1/19/23 at 12:53 pm to OU Guyincome tax is theft. So...anything but that.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by Flats 
on 1/19/23 at 12:55 pm to Hopeful Doc
on 1/19/23 at 12:55 pm to Hopeful Docquote:
The argument for flat tax says, “it’s ok because this is fair”
I'm past that point. Even if I thought a progressive tax was "fair", from a pragmatic aspect it's not fooking working. Having half the country essentially firewalled (in one direction) from federal spending is a disaster.
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by RogerTheShrubber on 1/19/23 at 12:56 pm to Flats
on 1/19/23 at 12:56 pm to Flatsquote:
No. Once you open the door to exemptions you introduce lobbyists and bribes to the game
In the fifties the tax code was over 11,000 pages. The first two pages were all it took to list your marginal brackets, and a statement that all sources of income had to be included.
The remaining 10,998 were dedicated to lobbyists carving out exceptions and exemptions for various people and groups.
This post was edited on 1/19 at 12:59 pm
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by OU Guy on 1/19/23 at 12:57 pm to Hopeful Doc
on 1/19/23 at 12:57 pm to Hopeful DocThe problem now is rich folk have layers of tax lawyers to comb tax laws and find ways around paying. So in reality the lower income brackets pay more tax than the rich.
Taxing sales would capture the rich sales at purchase. That in then might allow the tax cents per dollar to be lower thqn income tax for a lot of people as higher income earners would pay more taxes via sales since they buy more stuff.
The tax codes are out of hand and IRS is used as a political weapon. Sales tax eliminates all the bias. The more you spend the more tax you pay.
Its not perfect but better than current system
Taxing sales would capture the rich sales at purchase. That in then might allow the tax cents per dollar to be lower thqn income tax for a lot of people as higher income earners would pay more taxes via sales since they buy more stuff.
The tax codes are out of hand and IRS is used as a political weapon. Sales tax eliminates all the bias. The more you spend the more tax you pay.
Its not perfect but better than current system
re: Income Tax vs Flat/Sales Tax. Which is Better?Posted by VoxDawg 
on 1/19/23 at 1:03 pm to Hopeful Doc
on 1/19/23 at 1:03 pm to Hopeful Docquote:
Throw on about 100 years of the thought in the latter, and we are at today.
Bingo. The Reagan tax restructuring bill of 1984 took us down to two different tax brackets, and two only. The slippery slope of industry-requested deductions, carve-outs, etc are precisely why we're where we are now.
Some of the strongest arguments for the NRST is that it spreads the burden of paying the taxes that are collected by the Treasury among ALL consumers in the United States. Employees, CEOs, drug dealers, tourists, illegal aliens, everyone.
The bill is structured to be practically equivalent to the amount of embedded corporate income taxes which are currently passed along the distribution chain and ultimately paid by retail consumers at the point of sale. This figure is somewhere between 21-23% of the cost of what you pay for new goods at the register. Corporations do not PAY income taxes, they COLLECT them and send it back to the IRS.
Families at/below the poverty line are insulated from the cost of the NRST paid at the point of sale via a "prebate" which is calculated by Treasury as being the estimated cost of NRST paid by a family each month, based on size. That amount is sent to each family at the beginning of every month.
I'd recommend beginning here: How FairTax works
Page 1 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News