re: In Tucker’s opinion Nick Fuentes is a CIA op to hurt the right. Same play as David Duke.

Fuentes is talented. He’s absolutely right regarding putting a pause on all immigration. He is 100% America First. Like anyone he’s got some takes I don’t agree with, he’s a kid after all. But he has a following, granted they are all incels.

quote:

---

I don’t put a lot of stock in the opinions of young men shaped by their “life experience” unless it was spent getting shot at.

---

Thats fair and you dont have to. That said, cant fault people for drawing their own conclusions and using logic

I've never heard of Duke being CIA until this thread

Every Republican kid in the 1980's was against the Sandinistas, as well they should be. The douchebag writer of what Bunk posted doesn't even begin to tell the story of what evil the Sandinistas did regular citizens in Nicaragua.


Also folks in the 1980's were still sold on the Harry Trumann lie of "containment" and thought "communism is coming to America!!!"


No, it fricking started in America, going all the way back to the Bolshevik revolution.

quote:

---

Then let me be more direct....anyone who believes David Duke was in anyway controlled by the CIA to hurt the right, is a fricking moron, and has a compulsive need to explain everything that goes against their narrative as a grand conspiracy. Now, if you don't agree with what I said, go ahead and post the evidence to support your opinion.

---

"controlled" and propped up are two different things, to achieve the same ends

throwing a crybaby temper tantrum that anything YOU say MUST be "proven" wrong by whoever reads your ad hominem stupid shite does not cut it

since you're a lazy historian, that makes you a fricking idiot on a political message board

You think that Tucker, the guy who was fired for not listening to his boss’s directions is a CIA plant? The guy who started his own company making 10% of his former income but staying independent so he can say what he wants, is a CIA plant?

I love conspiracy theories, but this one is just flat wrong. Tucker is one of the few that isn’t corrupt.

Settle down. I just posted what I saw a few years ago. If you can't look at Tucker's pedigree and history and maybe think twice that some preppy blue blood beltway guy may not be all in with MAGA, I don't know what to say.

quote:

---

Settle down. I just posted what I saw a few years ago

---

you posted literal crap

...i.e., the writer of that article is an absolute leftist and seems to be dishonest on several points





ETA: Mint Press itself is very decent sometimes. Chris Hedges publishes, Seymour Hersch, and there's plenty of good work I'm seeing headings for.


seems the guy writing about Tucker is simply jealous that a former young neocon saw the light in his later years, and so the writer is not being fair in his analysis. ETA: I've seen some of this MacLeod guy's Israel reporting, and it's pretty good.


Sadly too, it's the Mint Press with some writer who's the first I've seen to basically blame Ukraine on Trump. So there are more than a few writers with Mint Press who are liars


MacLeod gleefully quotes Carlos Maza and Rutger Bregman, who are both absolute fricking radical loons - why would he do that?

Cadace Owens is a bigger kook and clown than Nick Fuentes will ever be. And she did 180 on all her views once she realized the other side was profitable

Fuentes destroyed both of them

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.