- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
In much the same way she started her career, Kamala is going down
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:02 am
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:02 am
Her poll numbers are plummeting.
LINK
quote:
Now in our latest polls, Quinnipiac and we have her at 7% and 5% respectively.
LINK
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 10:04 am
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:07 am to Ted2010
Man, those poll numbers really suck. But I don't think she's the type to just take it lying down.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:12 am to Ted2010
Those numbers have to be hard to swallow; unless you're Kamala
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:12 am to Ted2010
We may not agree with all of Tulsi's politics, but we can all appreciate that she curb-stomped that lying whore, Kamala Harris in the 2nd debate.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:13 am to Ted2010
She better get those Heels Up again and "work" her way back to the top. I'm sure there is a pollster out there that would love to help her out.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:14 am to Ted2010
quote:
Her pole numbers
I knew that all anyone had to do was shine the light on her background as a prosecutor and she was done, "Shebama" or not.
The fact that Biden didn't do it might preserve her (for demographic purposes) as his VP pick.
She would also balance out Warren or Sanders, so her best bet might be to withdraw, focus on grandstanding in the Senate and prep for that VP spot (which won't pick up until next year).
But that fundraising, though...
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:22 am to Ted2010
quote:
In much the same way she started her career, Kamala is going down
She needs to be on her knees more and start "Prey-ing more often.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:23 am to tiger114
Gabbi told Kamala to get rekt!
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:24 am to TideCPA
quote:Those numbers have her on her knees. Although she might come from behind....
those poll numbers really suck. But I don't think she's the type to just take it lying down.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:26 am to Ted2010
quote:Poll finds 93-95% of Americans are racist and sexist
Now in our latest polls, Quinnipiac and we have her at 7% and 5% respectively.
-CNN
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:29 am to Ted2010
Biden Warren or Sanders
What an amazing choice for Dems
What an amazing choice for Dems
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:30 am to Ted2010
quote:
In much the same way she started her career, Kamala is going down
So heels are not up?
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:37 am to Ted2010
From a strictly demographic standpoint, black women are the least liked group in the United States, just below Asian men.
Either of those two groups will have a very difficult task of being president.
A female has a difficult enough road to election. Throw in another variable, like race, and it's even harder. It will end up being Biden, or possibly Warren.
Neither have a chance against Trump.
Either of those two groups will have a very difficult task of being president.
A female has a difficult enough road to election. Throw in another variable, like race, and it's even harder. It will end up being Biden, or possibly Warren.
Neither have a chance against Trump.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:40 am to Ted2010
Harris will stay in because she wants to be Bidens VP.
The longer Sanders, Warren and Harris stay in the race the better it is for Biden.
If Sanders and Harris drop out early and their support moves to Warren, which is likely, the bigger trouble Biden is in.
The longer Sanders, Warren and Harris stay in the race the better it is for Biden.
If Sanders and Harris drop out early and their support moves to Warren, which is likely, the bigger trouble Biden is in.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:42 am to Tiger985
Biden has the best chance to actually win the election, which is still almost no chance.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:50 am to Ted2010
ONCE AGAIN AN INELIGIBLE CANDIDATE IS BEING PROMOTED FOR THE PRESIDENCY
Kamala Harris is NOT eligible to be President. Her father arrived from Jamaica in 1961—mother from India arrived in 1960 Neither was a resident the minimum of five years required to apply for naturalization.
The Constitution provides that: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The proper question under this clause is not whether the candidate is a “Citizen of the United States.” Rather, the correct question is whether the candidate is a “natural born Citizen” as required to be eligible for the office.
"The Framers found the definition of “natural born Citizen” that would suit their purpose of protecting the future of and preserving the new nation not in the English common law and William Blackstone but in natural law and the law of nations as commented upon by Emer de Vattel, in his treatise, The Law of Nations, or Principles of the Laws of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, bk. 1, c. 19, sec. 212 (original French in 1758 and first English in 1759). This law became American common law. "
LINK /
Kamala Harris is NOT eligible to be President. Her father arrived from Jamaica in 1961—mother from India arrived in 1960 Neither was a resident the minimum of five years required to apply for naturalization.
The Constitution provides that: “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
The proper question under this clause is not whether the candidate is a “Citizen of the United States.” Rather, the correct question is whether the candidate is a “natural born Citizen” as required to be eligible for the office.
"The Framers found the definition of “natural born Citizen” that would suit their purpose of protecting the future of and preserving the new nation not in the English common law and William Blackstone but in natural law and the law of nations as commented upon by Emer de Vattel, in his treatise, The Law of Nations, or Principles of the Laws of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns, bk. 1, c. 19, sec. 212 (original French in 1758 and first English in 1759). This law became American common law. "
LINK /
This post was edited on 8/20/19 at 10:53 am
Posted on 8/20/19 at 10:51 am to tiger114
All it took was ONE good soldier
Posted on 8/20/19 at 11:01 am to Ted2010
That must be tough for Kamala to swallow.
Posted on 8/20/19 at 11:02 am to ImaObserver
quote:
ONCE AGAIN AN INELIGIBLE CANDIDATE IS BEING PROMOTED FOR THE PRESIDENCY Kamala Harris is NOT eligible to be President. Her father arrived from Jamaica in 1961—mother from India arrived in 1960
Kamala was born in the USA.
Case closed.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News