- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If we had 100% across the board equality of outcomes racially
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:07 pm
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:07 pm
Then where do you go from there, obviously smarter people will achieve more and have a higher standard of living than the low IQ across all racial spectrums.
What's the next step?
What's the next step?
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:08 pm to Strannix
quote:
What's the next step?
To what?
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:08 pm to Strannix
fricking over whites and Asians because of “history” of blacks and Hispanics being inferior.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:10 pm to Strannix
You know what happens. Eventually, some people will be more equal.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:10 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
To what?
Equality of outcomes for stupid people
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:18 pm to Strannix
China had "equal outcomes" on their collective farms in Mao's day. After a while the hard working people got tired of seeing the slackers get the same rewards and they too slacked. China had a famine until Ping took power and divided the farms among the farmers with each getting to keep what they produced over the rent quota.
The famine ended.
The famine ended.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:22 pm to Strannix
But we got rid of all history so there’s no reference
This post was edited on 7/25/20 at 12:23 pm
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:23 pm to Strannix
“Why did it have to take so long to finally achieve equality? It shouldn’t have.”
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:24 pm to Strannix
Orwell covered this, some people are made dumber.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:24 pm to Strannix
I put the scenario this way:
Let us say that the average net worth of individuals in the US is 100K. On Jan. 1 we confiscate all of the net worth over 100K and redistribute it to all the people under 100K until everyone has the same net worth.
Then, we ban all redistribution of wealth. Lower taxes, no welfare, no nothing.
Q: On what date after Jan. 1 will there be a huge rich/poor gap?
I would go with 2 months.
Let us say that the average net worth of individuals in the US is 100K. On Jan. 1 we confiscate all of the net worth over 100K and redistribute it to all the people under 100K until everyone has the same net worth.
Then, we ban all redistribution of wealth. Lower taxes, no welfare, no nothing.
Q: On what date after Jan. 1 will there be a huge rich/poor gap?
I would go with 2 months.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:26 pm to Auburn1968
Here?
Within a month, some would be on their way to being broke and others would be quietly accumulating wealth.
Within six months, the quiet accumulaters would still be quiet, but richer.
In five years there'd be three levels of wealth.
Within a month, some would be on their way to being broke and others would be quietly accumulating wealth.
Within six months, the quiet accumulaters would still be quiet, but richer.
In five years there'd be three levels of wealth.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:26 pm to Strannix
quote:
obviously smarter people will achieve more and have a higher standard of living than the low IQ across all racial spectrums.
What's the next step?
We would all be speaking Chinese?
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:27 pm to Zach
Not long. A year max. Within 5 years, it would return to being the same as before.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:28 pm to Strannix
I think the Cowboys owner Jerry Jones put it pretty well a couple years or so back
If you took all the money in the world and split it evenly among all the people in the world within a matter of months the same people who had the bulk of it before would have it again.
I think that's undeniably true.
If you took all the money in the world and split it evenly among all the people in the world within a matter of months the same people who had the bulk of it before would have it again.
I think that's undeniably true.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:29 pm to Strannix
The narrative is shifting from equality to equity.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:37 pm to Strannix
quote:
Then where do you go from there, obviously smarter people will achieve more and have a higher standard of living than the low IQ across all racial spectrums.
What's the next step?
Give more money to the low IQ individuals, obviously.
#progressivism
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:40 pm to Strannix
Equality of Opportunity has been subverted and twisted to Equity of Outcomes.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:44 pm to DeusVultMachina
There will never be equality of outcomes without equality of behaviors.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:48 pm to Sponge
quote:
Give more money to the low IQ individuals, obviously.
In other words...create a welfare state? I thought
we already tried that.
Posted on 7/25/20 at 12:52 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Orwell covered
So did Ayn Rand...
YouTube - Atlas Shrugged Trailer (Part 1)
YouTube - Atlas Shrugged Trailer (Part 2)
YouTube - Atlas Shrugged Trailer (Part 3)
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News