Started By
Message
locked post

If the Democrats were so giddy about Moore winning, why were Booker and Obama brought in?

Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:12 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:12 pm
Just for laughs, right?
Posted by SelaTiger
Member since Aug 2016
17905 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:13 pm to
They want this more than anything.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:13 pm to
Moore likely wins, but that could go the other way. Big names don't put their names on the line for blowouts. They think it's close.
Posted by Sidicous
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Aug 2015
17093 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

Just for laughs, right?


That's the best use of those 2 anyway.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:14 pm to
Which means the motivation is stealing the seat, not morality
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 7:15 pm
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32460 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:15 pm to
MUH OSSOFF
Posted by Freder
Member since Aug 2014
809 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:15 pm to
It this sarcasm? Or are you being deliberately obtuse?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

Which means the motivation is stealing the seat, not morality
We don't often agree, but you usually make a point in your posts.
Posted by OBReb6
Memphissippi
Member since Jul 2010
37672 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:16 pm to
He is not being obtuse believe it or not. Ask Toddy
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:30 pm to
Point is, this Democratic spin that they're happy for Moore to win is retarded. They thought they had a shot at the seat and are cranking out this new line to save face. No one will give a shite about Moore in two weeks
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:31 pm to
Why are the two mutually exclusive?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:32 pm to
They don't really believe the former. The American news cycle will be over Moore in short time.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:34 pm to
quote:

Point is, this Democratic spin that they're happy for Moore to win is retarded. They thought they had a shot at the seat and are cranking out this new line to save face. No one will give a shite about Moore in two weeks
Doesn't really address them wanting to win a seat vs. morality.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:37 pm to
I didn't phrase that well, this line that they were happy for him to win only emerged as polling shifted.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:38 pm to
I mean they’re happy for him to win in the same way you guys like Sheila Jackson Lee. Sure, you’d love to have the seat, but second best is an imbecile that will rally your base.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:39 pm to
No one runs on "this senator is a dumbass"

The news cycle does not cover congressional members enough for it to be an albatross like a polarizing president
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:41 pm to
Virtue signaling, obviously.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80121 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:41 pm to
You keep telling me the MSM doesn’t matter and that everyone gets their news from their little corners of the internet they prefer.

I just don’t understand how SJL can be a good thing for the GOP for her idiocy and her soundbites yet Roy wont play that same role for DailyKOS and MotherJones
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 7:42 pm
Posted by LSUAlum2001
Stavro Mueller Beta
Member since Aug 2003
47119 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:42 pm to
Moore wins.
Rs get heat for the accusations.
Moore steps down.
Gov appoints an R replacement.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112544 posts
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:43 pm to
You completely missed my point on SJL

as retarded as she is, has any Republican tried running on her stupidity? No, it would be pointless.

Will Republicans in Ohio have to defend Moore? No.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram