- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I Just Have One Question Regarding President Trump and Obstruction of Justice
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:13 am to AggieHank86
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:13 am to AggieHank86
LiberalHank
0
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:13 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Notice the last 4 words, "due administration of justice"
Obviously there is no justice due when there is no crime, in fact to conduct a phony investigation around a phony crime is itself an injustice.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:13 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
quote:
1) The potential crime being investigated was collusion.
Ebbnslow said in reply:
It was about investigating Russian interference in our election. So you're wrong right off the bat.
It was about using that "investigation" to set Trump up as insurance after the election. The Russians / Soviets have done this in our elections forever. To claim that is the focal point is either disingenuous, or beyond ignorant.
It would be like investigating "why does the sun rise" as a means to further investigate a family trying to go green by installing solar panels. And as a result of the ivestigation, that family being blamed for the Obama/Solyndra scam. Nevermind, I don't want to give your ilk ideas.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:17 am to Ebbandflow
U Mad Bro??
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:20 am to TrueTiger
quote:
to conduct a phony investigation around a phony crime is itself an injustice.
Funny how Democrat politicians never consider this; much less acknowledge that this is exactly what happened.
One of the libs said earlier, "This was an investigation about Russian interference in the election." If that's true, then why was the investigation focused singularly on Trump and his people? Why didn't Mueller look into HRC and the DNC's role regarding the fake Russian dossier? Why was Manafort's Ukranian "business efforts" examined, but a certain business partner with the last name of Podesta totally ignored? What was the justification for the sunrise raid on Roger Stone's home, with CNN being tipped off in advance?
This was NEVER an objective investigation about Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. If it had been such, then Mueller would've looked at EVERYTHING, including FISAGATE. This was nothing but a witch-hunt from the jumpstart.
PS - Get ready for the real crimes and real criminals to be investigated, indicted, and successfully prosecuted. Some of you are going to hate Round 2. As Sara Carter has said, 2019 is the year of the boomerang.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:21 am to KCT
Don't expect an answer other than stupid shite like "he made tweets criticizing Mueller or "he fired Comey", which isn't illegal.
It's funny watching libs now concede that Russian collusion was a hoax and their investigation was a farce and falling back on ^so what if we ran a fake investigation, orange man still tried to obstruct it".
The obstruction angle was their plan all along. Trump never took the bait and now they're grasping at anything they think is obstruction.
It's funny watching libs now concede that Russian collusion was a hoax and their investigation was a farce and falling back on ^so what if we ran a fake investigation, orange man still tried to obstruct it".
The obstruction angle was their plan all along. Trump never took the bait and now they're grasping at anything they think is obstruction.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:24 am to KCT
A theory could be that because he obstructed justice, they weren’t able to find evidence he colluded. He did a damn good job of obstructing. I don’t believe this one bit though, but it’s what they’ll claim.
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 11:29 am
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:29 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
That's pretty rich considering that Obama is the one that started the investigation.
That's what I said dipshit - it started under Obama's admin. I'd hope to hell he would start an investigation. Why did Obama even let this happen? Did our government at the time not have resources to keep it from happening?
Comprehension isn't your forte I see.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:29 am to baybeefeetz
quote:Is it not possible that Trump wasn’t entirely sure if he had committed a crime that would be uncovered by the investigation, and thus obstructed?
Of course you can. For it to be a crime your motive in interfering has to be “corrupt” though.
Is it not possible that he figured a-hole Dems wouldn’t be fair in the investigation? So he obstructed in order to protect himself from those vile shits?
Really my only point is these threads are stupid. It’s POSSIBLE to obstruct even if you’re innocent. Why do so many keep asking this?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:29 am to SelaTiger
You can choose to practice your 5th amendment right. Not participate in a investigation and that’s obstruction?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:31 am to xxGEAUXxx
quote:
You can choose to practice your 5th amendment right. Not participate in a investigation and that’s obstruction?
Is this what you think happened?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:34 am to KCT
quote:
et, you kept posting about how it would result in the thread being deleted.
Uh, I think you have me confused with somebody else. I remember posting something like that, but it's not and nor was it important enough for me to go on and on about. Feel free to post links. I'll come back and look for the links, but otherwise begin ignoring your stupid arse from here on out.
ETA: I went back and looked, and you clearly misunderstood my posts at that time. I was extremely interested in what appeared to be a deliberate attempt by SOMEBODY ELSE to dirty up the thread. You are the fricking liar.
POST ALL THE POSTS WHERE I WAS "GIDDY" ABOUT THE THREAD BEING DELETED OR PREDICTING IT WOULD BE DELETED.
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 11:45 am
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:38 am to Antonio Moss
Yes and no. I believe people on both sides complies and refused with the investigation. I’ll be totally honest. I have not read the entirety of the report and probably won’t. No one has been able to lay out groundwork for an obstruction case.
But, overall all a which hunt for two years was conducted. No charges, no impeachment and no indictments? Now people are calling for obstruction? It’s silly. Sorry the lady or guy you wanted to win, didn’t.
But, overall all a which hunt for two years was conducted. No charges, no impeachment and no indictments? Now people are calling for obstruction? It’s silly. Sorry the lady or guy you wanted to win, didn’t.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:41 am to xxGEAUXxx
quote:
No one has been able to lay out groundwork for an obstruction case.
The groundwork is laid out in the report although I don’t believe it amounts to obstruction. And it has nothing to do with Trump refusing to cooperate.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:45 am to Ebbandflow
quote:
Ebbandflow
Another conspiracy theorist. What a loser.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:46 am to Sody Cracker
quote:
Another conspiracy theorist. What a loser.
He didn’t read the report. He’s just regurgitating false talking points from extremists.
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:48 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
report although I don’t believe it amounts to obstruction
It doesnt in any way amount to obstruction
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:49 am to SDVTiger
quote:
It doesnt in any way amount to obstruction
Which count and why?
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:51 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
It’s POSSIBLE to obstruct even if you’re innocent. Why do so many keep asking this?
Yes, but not in this situation in which the one being investigated simultaneously has the responsibility to make sure that the investigation is justified AND has the ultimate factual knowledge that such an investigation is an injustice itself and should be stopped.
This is an EXTREMELY rare set of circumstances.
The planets don't align this way but once every few centuries.
This post was edited on 4/21/19 at 11:52 am
Posted on 4/21/19 at 11:52 am to TrueTiger
quote:
has the ultimate factual knowledge that such an investigation is an injustice itself and should be stopped.
That simply isn’t true
Page 3 of 6
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News