- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I believe the Russians exposing Hillary and the corrupt democrat fix had some
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:38 pm
effect on the vote for Hillary. I would wager Trump didn't pick up any votes however her character flaws and the party's corruption kept some dems from voting out of disgust.
Part of an important decision like voting for the president is based upon "can I trust this person" and obviously in her case the answer was no. And the more a candidate's real self is made public the more informed the vote is. Not once has she denied any of the dirty laundry nor have the dems. They are mad because the public was made whole and informed courtesy of Podesta's gaff.
And to the degree that the public was informed based upon what the Russians or whomever went public with it, the result was a good thing.
Part of an important decision like voting for the president is based upon "can I trust this person" and obviously in her case the answer was no. And the more a candidate's real self is made public the more informed the vote is. Not once has she denied any of the dirty laundry nor have the dems. They are mad because the public was made whole and informed courtesy of Podesta's gaff.
And to the degree that the public was informed based upon what the Russians or whomever went public with it, the result was a good thing.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:43 pm to jimdog
Who said and what evidence do you have that Russians exposed Hillary? Wikileaks exposed Hillary not Russians and she was just a shite person and shite presidential candidate. She didnt even need help exposing just how shitty she was .
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 5:44 pm
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:47 pm to jimdog
I personally don't give a frick if Russians registered and drove voters to the polls as long as that fat fricking drunk hag didn't get elected.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:49 pm to DreauxB2015
Had nothing to do with " exposing " Hillary. The Russians found out Clinton and Obama were using the CIA to influence Russian Parliamentary elections. Merely a quid pro quo by the Russians. The Russians were just better at it.
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:50 pm to bamarep
She rigged the DNC nomination process, and payed for a Dossier that created an investigation against her rival in the Presidential election. Probably not a more corrupt individual in Political history, so really don’t care how we elected Trump, cause we dodged a F’ing bullet....
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:55 pm to DreauxB2015
Like everyone else I guessing at the consensus. BTW does "whomever ring a bell with you? LOL. But even most R's seem to think they were on the other end of the phish. Hell they did the country a favor if they were. Not that they were trying to since they also tried to hack the R's. But the more informed people are the better the outcome of the vote.
This post was edited on 1/18/19 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 1/18/19 at 5:58 pm to OchoDedos
Hell they didn't expose her! Obviously their goal was to under mind the American system same as we under mind theirs. But the 'Pubs didn't take the bait when they got phished. But they hit a treasure trove on corrupt Hillary and the corrupt dems.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News