View in: Desktop
Copyright @2024 TigerDroppings.com. All rights reserved.
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Posted by
Message
How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani related
Posted by Wtodd on 1/9/20 at 7:54 am724
Soleimani shouldn't have been the story; the story should have been Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis bc it was his Popular Mobilization Unit (PMU) forces that attacked our embassy in Iraq. We should have said that we targeted Muhandis and didn't know Soleimani was with him since Soleimani was forbidden to travel outside of Iran and thus bc he violated the UN mandate he became collateral damage.
Had the story been framed this way, it would have been a 1 day deal.
A good read on Muhandis.... jpost
Had the story been framed this way, it would have been a 1 day deal.
quote:
His death has gone less noticed because it was overshadowed by Soleimani’s, but it is no less important. Muhandis was important because for years he helped build up not only his own armed militia, Kataib Hezbollah (KH), but also transformed the PMU into an official force that can project power throughout Iraq and into Syria.
The PMU is more than Hezbollah: It is a massive organization of 100,000 armed men, with access to another 200,000 men who have served in its ranks. Raised to fight ISIS, it became an official force of the government in 2017. It is trying to become Iraq’s version of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Soleimani and Muhandis were working together on this effort.
A good read on Muhandis.... jpost
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by SidewalkDawg on 1/9/20 at 7:55 am to Wtodd
quote:
Had the story been framed this way, it would have been a 1 day deal.
But then we would have missed out on the left supporting terrorists openly.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Wtodd on 1/9/20 at 7:57 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:
But then we would have missed out on the left supporting terrorists openly.
They supported the Squad before this so supporting terrorists is SOP
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Manzielathon on 1/9/20 at 8:03 am to Wtodd
I understand where you’re coming from, but given the official ties between the Iraqi Government and the PMU’s, us brazenly and intentionally assassinating their leadership, with no other primary targets, in the middle of Baghdad would not have improved our standing in the country.
That would make it much harder for the Iraqi Government to play both sides and allow for continued American presence.
That would make it much harder for the Iraqi Government to play both sides and allow for continued American presence.
This post was edited on 1/9 at 8:05 am
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Wtodd on 1/9/20 at 8:07 am to Manzielathon
quote:
us brazenly intentionally assassinating their leadership
Only after he and his guys attacked the US; our embassy is deemed US soil.
quote:
would not have improved our standing in the country
frick 'em......Iran's influence in the Iraqi Parliament is understated & under reported. If Iraq really wants us to leave, pay us for the base and we're gone.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Manzielathon on 1/9/20 at 8:17 am to Wtodd
Politics in the Middle East requires far more subtlety and nuance than retaliating against every single mortar attack. Which is the primary reason we should never have gone in the first place.
You and I may want to leave Iraq, but unfortunately as a whole the United States Government and Military does not.
I really don’t feel like Iran’s influence is understated or underreported. If anything I feel like our own influence is underestimated.
This idea that because both governments are Shia that they get along and agree all the time so we should just call it quits isn’t true. There are considerable religious, political, and ethnic differences between Iraqi and Iranian Shias. There’s essentially a never ending clerical power struggle between Qom / Tehran and Najaf / Baghdad.
You and I may want to leave Iraq, but unfortunately as a whole the United States Government and Military does not.
I really don’t feel like Iran’s influence is understated or underreported. If anything I feel like our own influence is underestimated.
This idea that because both governments are Shia that they get along and agree all the time so we should just call it quits isn’t true. There are considerable religious, political, and ethnic differences between Iraqi and Iranian Shias. There’s essentially a never ending clerical power struggle between Qom / Tehran and Najaf / Baghdad.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Weekend Warrior79 on 1/9/20 at 8:19 am to Wtodd
quote:
didn't know Soleimani was with him
I think that would help strengthen the House Dems plan for today by using the incompetence of the military under Trump's leadership. "They specifically went after a target without knowing who would be directly affected."
This is the same group that can acknowledge that we are better off without Soleimani, but still want to limit his powers because he didn't ask permission to take out Soleimani
This post was edited on 1/9 at 8:20 am
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Meauxjeaux on 1/9/20 at 8:19 am to Wtodd
Naw.
Take Suliemani our and swing our big dick.
Take Suliemani our and swing our big dick.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by AggieHank86 on 1/9/20 at 8:21 am to SidewalkDawg
quote:They were both terrorists, so this observation is inaccurate.quote:But then we would have missed out on the left supporting terrorists openly.
Had the story been framed this way, it would have been a 1 day deal.
But it WOULD have avoided the “assassination of a foreign government official” angle.
OP is correct.
Nah...
No fricking apologies and no fricks given.
The socialist idiots in this country with their hand up the democrats asses will find much fault in anything and everything the President does.
They are looking like complete morons right now championing a terrorist regime. Nothing the President does will reverse the brainwashing that has been done to the liberal party so it's best to just do the right thing and call it what it is.
No fricking apologies and no fricks given.
The socialist idiots in this country with their hand up the democrats asses will find much fault in anything and everything the President does.
They are looking like complete morons right now championing a terrorist regime. Nothing the President does will reverse the brainwashing that has been done to the liberal party so it's best to just do the right thing and call it what it is.
TD SponsorTD Fan
USA
Member since 2001
USA
Member since 2001
Thank you for supporting our sponsors Posted by Site Sponsor to Everyone
Advertisement
trump has had four national security advisors and two interim advisors in three years. And many would question the suitability of most of the people he has chosen
Bolton for an easy example...he’s rightly ridiculed but he didn’t get that job without being vetted by trump and his people and selected for it. Now he’s a national joke?
trump has made some pretty horrible staff decisions and it’s fair to question what affect that has and is having on decision making and managing the narrative
Bolton for an easy example...he’s rightly ridiculed but he didn’t get that job without being vetted by trump and his people and selected for it. Now he’s a national joke?
trump has made some pretty horrible staff decisions and it’s fair to question what affect that has and is having on decision making and managing the narrative
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Mid Iowa Tiger on 1/9/20 at 8:26 am to Wtodd
I have ad some conversations with folks I know who are pretty in the loop in the administration their take on Trump is he is good, really good at the "gut" stuff. All politicians have to use their guts from time to time but most don't have the ability to time and again come out with such positive results.
You can call it guts, instincts whatever you want to. Trump has that innate ability to read the situation and see through all the noise and options to get to the solution that resonates in America's interest better than most before him.
We got on the subject because I asked if Trump was lucky or good. I came out of the conversation more excited about the second 4 years of the Trump administration than I thought I could get.
Enjoy the next 5 years it is going to be the new golden age for America.
You can call it guts, instincts whatever you want to. Trump has that innate ability to read the situation and see through all the noise and options to get to the solution that resonates in America's interest better than most before him.
We got on the subject because I asked if Trump was lucky or good. I came out of the conversation more excited about the second 4 years of the Trump administration than I thought I could get.
Enjoy the next 5 years it is going to be the new golden age for America.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by AggieHank86 on 1/9/20 at 8:32 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:Trump is a salesman, and a very, very good one. OF COURSE he is good at “reading the room.” It is probably his greatest skill.
I have ad some conversations with folks I know who are pretty in the loop in the administration their take on Trump is he is good, really good at the "gut" stuff. All politicians have to use their guts from time to time but most don't have the ability to time and again come out with such positive results. ... Trump has that innate ability to read the situation and see through all the noise and options to get to the solution that resonates .....
You were talking to “his people.” Are you surprised that they think highly of the guy who brought them into the White House?
This post was edited on 1/9 at 8:44 am
That beard tho.
Salty. Peppery.
Salty. Peppery.
quote:
Muhandis was a quiet and outwardly modest man who shied away from donning a uniform full of medals. He modeled himself on Soleimani, even down to his beard. The two men could have been members of the same family. They were from the same ideological family. Muhandis was the less important of the two, but he did not seek out interviews or cameras.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by Sid in Lakeshore on 1/9/20 at 8:38 am to cgrand
quote:
many DEMOCRATS would question the suitability of most of the people he has chosen
quote:
Bolton for an easy example...
You may not like his positions, but he is EASILY one of the most highly qualified people in the US.
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by saints5021 on 1/9/20 at 8:42 am to deltaland
We have been treading lightly around the middle east for over 20 years...frick that! Trump should come out and say for every random American killed, a high level Government official of that country will be blown to hell by a drone. Do that a few times and you would be amazed at how quiet all the Death to America chants will become.
quote:
trump has made some pretty horrible staff decisions
He’s gotten some pretty horrible advice from people who want him to fail. Remember - he was an outsider coming in. The insiders were showing him to the closet when he was looking for the bathroom and they then laughed at him behind his back. And now they can’t understand why he doesn’t trust them
re: How Trump's National Security let him down; Soleimani relatedPosted by BuckyCheese on 1/9/20 at 8:47 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
This is the same group that can acknowledge that we are better off without Soleimani, but still want to limit his powers because he didn't ask permission to take out Soleimani
Have been saying for months Queen Nanc is attempting to run the country from the Speaker's chair.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News