- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
How did Scalia get a 98-0 confirmation vote?
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:34 am
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:34 am
The 1986 Senate had 55 Dems / 45 Repubs.
Confirmed 98-0.
How?
Previous Senate Confirmation Results
1986 Senate Wiki
Confirmed 98-0.
How?
Previous Senate Confirmation Results
1986 Senate Wiki
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:35 am to finchmeister08
A more civilized time.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:35 am to PsychTiger
quote:
A more civilized time.
The democrats were slightly more sane than they are now.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:36 am to finchmeister08
Completely different world.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:36 am to finchmeister08
This was before the Democrat Party became uncivil, extreme, and Marxist.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:36 am to finchmeister08
it was before the DEMs fricked up the process the following year with Bork in 87
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:37 am to finchmeister08
a democrat back then had different opinions, not bat shite crazy agendas
and then, people actually voted if the candidate was a good person with great credibility
and then, people actually voted if the candidate was a good person with great credibility
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:37 am to finchmeister08
That was before Robert Bork and what Ted Kennedy did.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:37 am to finchmeister08
This was pre-Bork and much of the relative ire was against Rehnquist becoming Chief Justice (which was concurrent with Scalia's process).
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:38 am to Centinel
quote:
That was before Robert Bork and what Ted Kennedy did.
what happened there?
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:38 am to Wally Sparks
Senators once respected the exact role of the Senate in the conformation process. Then Bork. Now you are here.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:40 am to Centinel
quote:
That was before Robert Bork and what Ted Kennedy did.
yeah Bork was the following year
then they tripled down in 91 with Thomas (52-48)
when you hear leftists talk about "norms" and things like that, they pretend this all started with Garland
Ginsberg was appointed in 93 with a 96-3 vote, then Breyer 87-9
with Bush, you start to see the partisanship again by the DEMs (Roberts: 78-22, Alito 58-42). then it was fully partisan after that
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:41 am to finchmeister08
In my opinion, it was some point in the early 90’s when abortion and gun control became the 2 issues that basically polarized the entire electorate. Think about it... as conservatives, the second amendment and the right to life are 2 completely non-negotiables. I would never vote for a President that I thought would nominate a judge who would rule the second amendment didn’t guarantee an individual right to own a firearm. I’d never vote for a President who would knowingly nominate a judge who thought abortion (especially late term) should be legal. I suspect Liberals feel the exact opposite. Therefore, we are where we are now.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:43 am to finchmeister08
It was before democrats fricked the process with Bork because they are trash.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:45 am to dpd901
quote:
In my opinion, it was some point in the early 90’s when abortion and gun control became the 2 issues that basically polarized the entire electorate.
in the 90s, clinton got 2 liberal justices appointed with insane support
it started in the 80s with Bork, then ramped up bigly with Thomas in the early 90s
then it went nuclear under GWB and has remained partisan since
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:45 am to finchmeister08
No social media and there was no such thing as a 24 hour news cycle.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:46 am to finchmeister08
There weren't reptilian monsters representing the democrat party
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:47 am to finchmeister08
Scalia being Catholic actually played a large role. Reagan knew that most Northeast liberals couldn't be seen opposing a Catholic judge. He also had a very easy way about him that made him extremely likable to the public.
There were quite a few people in the administration who wanted Bork to go first and save Scalia. Knowing that whoever went second would likely flip the court and cause Democrats to put on a more aggressive defense. The feeling was that Bork would struggle in that spot but Scalia would shine.
There were quite a few people in the administration who wanted Bork to go first and save Scalia. Knowing that whoever went second would likely flip the court and cause Democrats to put on a more aggressive defense. The feeling was that Bork would struggle in that spot but Scalia would shine.
Posted on 10/15/20 at 8:56 am to finchmeister08
The Democrats are consumed with Leftist Ideological fervor. They are entirely Ideologically-possessed. It’s scary for America for a thousand reasons, SCOTUS confirmation hearings being just one. If they held the Senate and Presidency they would scrub the US Constitution , without reflection or regret, of everything that makes us special and unique to reflect their Leftist fundamentalism. They have set course for Marxist/Maoist Revolution. They are all in and that requires that they hold ALL the power. Barrett makes that much, much harder.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News