Started By
Message
locked post

"How can Barr open an investigation with no criminal predicate???"

Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:18 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69215 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:18 pm
Do the doucheterrys of the world not realize how big of a self own this is?

What was the criminal predicate to open an investigation on trump campaign?
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94294 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

What was the criminal predicate to open an investigation on trump campaign


It was her turn.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80085 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:20 pm to
Is it a self-own or is it a great mirror to show some of the Trump sycophants the fallacy of their argument?
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13493 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:21 pm to
C’mon man, if you try to apply logic to libtards you’ll go nuts. They pursue and embrace emotions and fantasy visions, not logic and reality.
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:21 pm to
The criminal predicate is illegally spying on the Trump campaign:

NSA database

FBI/Western assets spying

National Security letters

Illegal FISA warrants

Illegal unmaskings

Illegal Leaks
This post was edited on 5/19/19 at 12:24 pm
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29846 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:22 pm to
And leakin'.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57106 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

no criminal predicate


Seriously?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64064 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:23 pm to
What fallacy?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
72910 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:23 pm to
The tapping of his wires is the real crime

Cant wait for all that info
Posted by Bunyan
He/Him
Member since Oct 2016
20828 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

And leakin'.

Yep. Hard to keep up with all the crimes from the Obama administration sometimes
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80085 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:24 pm to
That you need a criminal predicate to open and investigation and/or be charged with obstruction of justice.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67511 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

What was the criminal predicate to open an investigation on trump campaign?



Even Watergate started with an actual crime.

Apparently rumors are enough for dems to engage the federal justice leviathan.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29846 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

That you need a criminal predicate to open and investigation and/or be charged with obstruction of justice.

So just open a case of obstruction in general eh? No official proceeding necessary to have been obstructed? That would be a "predicate".

Mr. Trump you are under arrest for obstruction of nothing in particular, SIR!
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80085 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:31 pm to
"criminal predicate" does not equal "official proceeding"
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
29846 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:36 pm to
Official proceeding = investigation of something. That the predicate required to find obstruction.
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

How can Barr open an investigation with no criminal predicate???" by HailHailtoMichigan!



By waving that elusive Obama magic wand
Posted by ApexTiger
cary nc
Member since Oct 2003
53758 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

What was the criminal predicate to open an investigation on trump campaign?


to prove to ourselves it was in fact a nothing burger?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80085 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

So just open a case of obstruction in general eh? No official proceeding necessary to have been obstructed? That would be a "predicate".


You're confusing the predicate of an official proceeding with the predicate of criminal activity. I'm not arguing you have to have an official proceeding as a predicate for a possible obstruction charge. In this case, the official proceeding is the Special Counsel investigation. But you do not need underlying criminal activity for an obstruction charge. You also do not need proven crimes to open an investigation.

This post was edited on 5/19/19 at 12:52 pm
Posted by DreauxB2015
Member since Nov 2015
7719 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:53 pm to
Muh Golden showers !
Posted by Halftrack
The Wild Blue Yonder
Member since Apr 2015
2763 posts
Posted on 5/19/19 at 12:54 pm to
The GOP has jumped the shark. Between this BS and abortion, they have pissed too many people off.

Some fricking big blue chickens are going to come home to roost in flocks so large that it will darken the skies.

And then, when the new President starts doing the shite Trump has been pulling all the GOPers are going to start moaning and bitching. That’s what happens when you swing a double-edged sword.

It’s called ‘comeback.’
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram