- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hiding the affidavit looks terrible
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:12 am
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:12 am
They have fricked up, they got shite.
Muh informants
Muh informants
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 9:13 am
12
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:14 am to Strannix
That affidavit has the name of the informant….the Bureaucratic State ain’t gonna share that name.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:17 am to Strannix
quote:
They have fricked up
They haven't fricked up. fricking up insinuates that there is accountability. There is no accountability for government.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:17 am to Strannix
The best thing Trump could have ever done is call for them to release the documents. 
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:18 am to Bass Tiger
Offer to redact the name and they will still refuse.
They don’t want to nail down why they did this and will obfuscate so they can pretend it is anything other than the actual truth.
They don’t want to nail down why they did this and will obfuscate so they can pretend it is anything other than the actual truth.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:20 am to Bass Tiger
quote:I agree with Strannix. The optics of withholding this affidavit are awful, and it would be a simple matter to redact identifying info for any CI.
That affidavit has the name of the informant….the Bureaucratic State ain’t gonna share that name.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 9:32 am
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:20 am to teke184
Do his attorneys not have a copy of the affidavit? Or were they just given a copy of the warrant?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:21 am to idlewatcher
quote:The PC affidavit was not unsealed, so he would not yet have possession.
Do his attorneys not have a copy of the affidavit? Or were they just given a copy of the warrant?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:23 am to Bass Tiger
This post was edited on 8/29/22 at 11:28 am
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
AggieHank86
Your boys fricked the duck, Hank.
And you still won't acknowledge that this is a never-ending witch hunt on Trump. Your TDS inhibits obvious facts from entering the brain.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I agree with Strannix. The optics of withholding this affidavit are awful, and it would bema simple matter to redact identifying info for any CI.
The optics are never awful when you have 90% of the press covering for you.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:26 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The PC affidavit was not unsealed, so he would not yet have possession.
danke sir
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:26 am to Strannix
Only (legit) reason to not publish it is to protect informants. However, the names and descriptions of the informants can easily be redacted, so they really have no excuses.
What we really want to see is WHAT they were after. Merely saying "classified documents" doesn't tell us shite. A lot of stuff is overclassified, and I would say that probably includes some top-secret information. For instance, Crossfire Hurricane was almost certainly top-secret and that is public knowledge now. And we know for a fact Trump has the Crossfire Hurricane documents in his possession.
What we really want to see is WHAT they were after. Merely saying "classified documents" doesn't tell us shite. A lot of stuff is overclassified, and I would say that probably includes some top-secret information. For instance, Crossfire Hurricane was almost certainly top-secret and that is public knowledge now. And we know for a fact Trump has the Crossfire Hurricane documents in his possession.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:26 am to Paddyshack
quote:
Your TDS inhibits obvious facts from entering the brain.
He does have a bad case. Otherwise, he seems like a decent person on the other boards.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:29 am to Strannix
Yes the optics are awful, however there is such an epidemic of stupidity in this country that a contingent of the population actually believes that obfuscating the affidavit MUST mean he’s guilty of SOMETHING.
After all that’s what the tv says right? The “tell me what to think so I don’t have to decide” box has spoken.
After all that’s what the tv says right? The “tell me what to think so I don’t have to decide” box has spoken.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:39 am to Strannix
quote:
Hiding the affidavit looks terrible
DS don’t care. People are dumb and many will forget by November.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:43 am to Strannix
They pulled the ole “You want to see how bad this is? We are unsealing the warrant! Ha!” Even sent the lecturing AG up to do it. Thought it gave them the upper hand.
Then Trump agreed instead of blocking like they hoped. No objections.
Warrant unsealed. Nothing burger.
Now next move by Trump is “unseal the Affidavit!”
DOJ…. Uhhhh. We didn’t think this through to the end.
Then Trump agreed instead of blocking like they hoped. No objections.
Warrant unsealed. Nothing burger.
Now next move by Trump is “unseal the Affidavit!”
DOJ…. Uhhhh. We didn’t think this through to the end.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:46 am to Bass Tiger
So.. Redact the name and release everything else?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:49 am to AggieHank86
quote:
I agree with Strannix. The optics of withholding this affidavit are awful, and it would be a simple matter to redact identifying info for any CI.
Nothing should be ever be redacted unless there is a vital national defense reason, people should always have the right to face their accusers face to face.
The entire concept of anonymous accusations is an anathema to our constitution.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News