- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hallelujah We reached a Verdict.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:32 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:32 pm
Sat as a juror on a Murder trial.
Things i took away from it.
DA did a piss poor job of presenting his case.
Defense did a decent job of dealing with what they had.
Never sit on a murder trial with a lib woman juror.
But in the end i feel that we reach some type of Justice.
Defendant was found Guiltily of Manslaughter, did my job.
Things i took away from it.
DA did a piss poor job of presenting his case.
Defense did a decent job of dealing with what they had.
Never sit on a murder trial with a lib woman juror.
But in the end i feel that we reach some type of Justice.
Defendant was found Guiltily of Manslaughter, did my job.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 6:35 pm
15
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:34 pm to JCinBAMA
If the DA did a piss poor job of presenting his case and the defendant was found guilty how is that doing your job?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:38 pm to armsdealer
That’s silly.
Why wouldn’t there be room for a guilty verdict even if the DA didn’t do a great job?
Say the murder was on video and it’s clear as day to the jury that the defendant is guilty. It’s still possible for a DA to do a below average job in the case.
Why wouldn’t there be room for a guilty verdict even if the DA didn’t do a great job?
Say the murder was on video and it’s clear as day to the jury that the defendant is guilty. It’s still possible for a DA to do a below average job in the case.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:44 pm to armsdealer
quote:
If the DA did a piss poor job of presenting his case and the defendant was found guilty how is that doing your job?
We went through the evidence and had to figure stuff out that
he didn't present, to reach a verdict. Piss Poor is probably
a poor choice of words.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:48 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
We went through the evidence and had to figure stuff out that he didn't present,
You convicted a dude on evidence that wasn’t presented?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:52 pm to UASports23
quote:
You convicted a dude on evidence that wasn’t presented?
It was presented into evidence.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:52 pm to armsdealer
For one, the prosecutor didn’t get a murder conviction.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:55 pm to JCinBAMA
Thank you
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:58 pm to UASports23
quote:
We went through the evidence and had to figure stuff out that he didn't present
Again bad choice of words..
What i should had said he presented evidence into the court
but some of it he didn't argue on it, that we thought he should have.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 6:59 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
Never sit on a murder trial with a lib woman juror.
Would love to hear the complications and pangs that came from this. Did you have to give her civics 101?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:01 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
lib woman
Destroyers of western civilization
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:10 pm to CauleyHog
quote:
Would love to hear the complications and pangs that came from this. Did you have to give her civics 101?
With that i will have to give you the players in the case.
Defendant- 60 yo black man
State witness- MA- white man friends with Defendant
Victim- MA- Hispanic man
All doing drugs in Defendant house.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:10 pm to JCinBAMA
Defense cousel here, bookmarked this thread for appeal, will need to depose you.
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 7:11 pm
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:11 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
Never sit on a murder trial with a lib woman juror.
There will be no real justice. no real peace. as long as these fruitcakes exist.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:12 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
What i should had said he presented evidence into the court but some of it he didn't argue on it, that we thought he should have.
So what are you trying to say here? When you say you the jury had to figure it out, what exactly do you mean? Did you guys use outside sources and methods to break down evidence that was entered into evidence but not presented?
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:17 pm to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
So what are you trying to say here? When you say you the jury had to figure it out, what exactly do you mean? Did you guys use outside sources and methods to break down evidence that was entered into evidence but not presented?
A lot of it was from the ME testimony and Crime scene Photos that were enter into evidence.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:39 pm to JCinBAMA
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:42 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
We went through the evidence and had to figure stuff out that
he didn't present, to reach a verdict. Piss Poor is probably
a poor choice of words.
It was an honest question. I don't know why people are so pissy about curiosity around here. I would not equate a piss poor presentation with proving beyond a reasonable doubt. Hence, why I asked the question.
I truly hope justice was served.
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:43 pm to UASports23
quote:
We went through the evidence and had to figure stuff out that he didn't present,
You convicted a dude on evidence that wasn’t presented?
No. He clearly said they went through the evidence. Example: A forensic expert matches the defendants fingerprints to those on the murder weapon. This is submitted into evidence, but the prosecutor never mentions it to the jury in his arguments. This is an unlikely scenario, but I’m trying to establish that the OP’s scenario is possible. It is!
Posted on 9/29/22 at 7:57 pm to JCinBAMA
Maybe you could put together a cheap gif to show the DA what they missed?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News