Started By
Message
locked post

Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer says Covid is over

Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:52 pm
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18066 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:52 pm
This is a great read and dives into the complete BS that is the pandemic.

He states that the flaws in the PCR test could equate to 50-100% of positives as false positives.

https://hubpages.com/politics/Pfizer-Chief-Science-Officer-Second-Wave-Based-on-Fake-Data-of-False-Positives-for-New-Cases-Pandemic-is-Over
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 9:53 pm
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
24641 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer says Covid is over



So do I
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:54 pm to
It's time to take off the masks.
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 9:55 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141632 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:54 pm to
Dumbass

It will end after the election
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:57 pm to
From OP link -

quote:

Of the PCR test, the prevalent COVID test used around the world, the authors write:

"more than half of the positives are likely to be false, potentially all of them."

The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is "simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus," which could be a piece of dead virus which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be transmitted, and cannot make anyone else sick.

"...a true positive does not necessarily indicate the presence of viable virus. In limited studies to date, many researchers have shown that some subjects remain PCR-positive long after the ability to culture virus from swabs has disappeared. We term this a ‘cold positive’ (to distinguish it from a ‘hot positive’, someone actually infected with intact virus). The key point about ‘cold positives’ is that they are not ill, not symptomatic, not going to become symptomatic and, furthermore, are unable to infect others."

Overall, Dr. Yeadon builds the case that any "second wave" of COVID, and any government case for lockdowns, given the well-known principles of epidemiology, will be entirely manufactured.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9242 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 9:59 pm to
'cold positive' and 'hot positive' are much better terms to use here than 'false positive'.
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49521 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:00 pm to
I met a twenty something young lady yesterday that had the Wuhan. She was is great physical shape and said it wasn't shite.
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18066 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

It will end after the election


Why wait 2 more months? Haven't we lost enough time?
This post was edited on 9/25/20 at 10:04 pm
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:06 pm to
Meanwhile they’re wreaking havoc on our schools with these ridiculous quarantine guidelines for muh exposure. Schools will play this BS game longer than most other institutions. Ticks me off to no end
Posted by Buckeye Jeaux
Member since May 2018
17756 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

'cold positive' and 'hot positive' are much better terms to use here than 'false positive'.


False positive works for me.
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9242 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:22 pm to
quote:

False positive works for me

That isn't correct though.

Think about it this way:

Imagine if this were a PCR test that detected a sequence found in ants. If tests yielded "ant positive" results when you tested a sample that was made of giraffe or pineapple - that would be a "false positive". Because those materials shouldn't yield "ant positive" results.

But the test can't determine if there is a whole ant or just pieces of an ant in the sample. The test simply identifies both those as "ant positive'.

Of course, just because the test determines a fragment of the virus is actually present (the result isn't 'false')... that does not necessarily mean that it's contagious / active.

I guess it's a matter of semantics. "False" implies the results are incorrect.

But this is more a matter of "quantity / quality" of virus present.



Posted by Mithridates6
Member since Oct 2019
8220 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 10:23 pm to
I tested positive and negative within the same week
Posted by 1loyalbamafan
alabama
Member since Mar 2015
2676 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:05 pm to
Mass hysteria is never accidental, but benefits someone. The only question left to answer is, whom?
Posted by supatigah
CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club
Member since Mar 2004
87360 posts
Posted on 9/25/20 at 11:07 pm to
Most people I know with positive Tests took a retest and were negative
Posted by omegaman66
greenwell springs
Member since Oct 2007
22772 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 12:12 am to
Death rate of people over 70 years old is almost 95%.
Posted by Yat27
Austin
Member since Nov 2010
8108 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 1:52 am to
quote:

Death rate of people over 70 years old is almost 95%.

Survival rate is 95%, baw.
Posted by 4Ghost
Member since Sep 2016
8518 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 2:04 am to
Happened to multiple members in my family, positive 1 week, negative the next.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123779 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 6:28 am to
Fatalities are a measure more or less independent of theoretic PCR errors. Are CV19 death rates inflated? Yes. But under present circumstance it remains the best way of assessing case incidence rates. CV19 CIRs is not going to decline significantly until the population gains herd immunity, hopefully by vaccine. Speculation that CV19 will "disappear" before then are unfounded.
quote:

Dr. Yeadon builds the case that any "second wave" of COVID, and any government case for lockdowns, given the well-known principles of epidemiology, will be entirely manufactured.
Once again, as Rand Paul pointed out in his deflowering of Fauci during recent hearings, there was but one purpose for "lockdown". That purpose was to prevent overwhelming our healthcare system with a surge of ICU cases. We no longer face that possibility ... anywhere.

Fauci knows that. He's chosen to ignore it. He is mixing his personal politics with medicine. An "expert" misleading the public about matters in his field is unforgivable.
Posted by memphis tiger
Memphis, TN
Member since Feb 2006
20720 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 6:35 am to
quote:


It will end after the election


Only if Biden wins
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54202 posts
Posted on 9/26/20 at 6:42 am to
quote:

I met a twenty something young lady yesterday that had the Wuhan. She was is great physical shape and said it wasn't shite.


I know a 61yo couple who both were positive. She maintained her five mile a day bike ride and all he had was a nagging cough for a couple of weeks. That's it.
This post was edited on 9/26/20 at 6:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram