Started By
Message

re: Ford’s ex BF has submitted sworn testimony indicating ford lied under oath

Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:16 am to
Posted by TSmith
New Orleans, La.
Member since Jan 2004
2238 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:16 am to
They need to make an example of this woman. What more will it take than this?
Posted by LSU2NO
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2007
1948 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:20 am to
quote:

But she started a conversation



A spoonful of lies helps the perjury go down,

the 'me-too' go down, the medicine go down.

A spoonful of lies help the crying go down,

But she started a conversation

in the most peculiar way.


Sung to 'A Spoonful of Sugar.'
This post was edited on 10/3/18 at 8:23 am
Posted by Jimmy2shoes
The South
Member since Mar 2014
11004 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:23 am to
The really horrible thing about all of this is nothing will be done to her. She will fade away in a month never to be heard from or about again much less prosecuted
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
101295 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:26 am to
Our favorite site, Gateway Pundit has this to say, they knew this information before:


"And on September 26th, the day before her testimony in Washington DC, the Malibu Times wrote about Ford’s relationship with Brian Merrick.

Ford was a Malibu resident; she attended Pepperdine University in 1991 and received a master’s degree in clinical psychology. She later taught at the university between 1995 and 1998.

During this time, she dated fellow Pepperdine student Brian Merrick, who is part of one of Malibu’s founding families as the youngest son of the late Judge John Merrick.

The two dated for eight years, as reported by the Wall Street Journal. During their relationship, Merrick stated Ford had never mentioned the assault.

It now seeme likely that the Judiciary Committee KNEW that Christine Blasey Ford dated Brian Merrick and KNEW she coached a friend to take a polygraph test years earlier.

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell knew this and walked Christine Ford into a nest of lies.
Via Charles Cooke at National Review:

it seems clear that Rachel Mitchell knew some of this during last week’s Senate hearing, because she asked Ford two extremely specific questions on the subject of polygraphs. They were:

MITCHELL: Had — have you ever given tips or advice to somebody who was looking to take a polygraph test?

FORD: Never.

And:

MITCHELL: Have you ever had discussions with anyone, beside your attorneys, on how to take a polygraph?

FORD: Never.

Ford also told Mitchell that she was “scared” of the test, and “didn’t expect it to be as long it was going to be.”

Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell and the Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee knew Ford lied about the polygraph tests.
Michell gave Christine Ford enough rope to hang herself… And she did."

LINK
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
65121 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 8:51 am to
We need an FBI investigation into this. If this is following trump rules, she should be brought up on charges immediately.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94740 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:10 am to
Call the Vote

#CallThefrickingVoteMitch
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 10:49 am to
Her attorneys seemed to get very agitated and nervous when the polygraph questioning came up.
Posted by ElmerPhudd
Member since Oct 2018
9 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 11:38 am to
If you read further into the Williams questioning, Ford's lawyers told Williams that they were representing Ford pro-bono (for free) and that they paid for the polygraph, administered by a former FBI polygraph expert. Good try, though
Posted by ElmerPhudd
Member since Oct 2018
9 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 11:41 am to
The only person who can seal the FBI's report is President Trump. He is the only one who gets the full copy and he can seal it, send it out to Congress, or reveal just selected cherry-picked reports. Why would all of the Dems demand an FBI report and all the GOP oppose it if it was the Dems who wanted to hide the results?
Posted by ElmerPhudd
Member since Oct 2018
9 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 11:54 am to
I read the letter, which was anonymously submitted to Fox. It didn't have a word about Ford teaching a friend how to beat a polygraph. She was easing her friend's anxiety by explaining how it works (you can google that information anywhere) and advising her to relax and not be afraid of it. "[Ford]explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped [her] become familiar and less nervous about the exam, using her background in psychology." I was fluttered when I got my DHS security clearance, and I can tell you it is a daunting experience knowing that too much anxiety can produce false positives. I would give anybody worried about taking a polygraph examination precisely the same way. At any rate, she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl. I fail to see how her later psychology education could have prepared her unless she took a time machine back to brief her younger self.
Posted by CajunTiger92
Member since Dec 2007
2860 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

At any rate, she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl. I fail to see how her later psychology education could have prepared her unless she took a time machine back to brief her younger self.



That’s just plain scwewy.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125290 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

was anonymously submitted to Fox.


False.

quote:

she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl.


Oh, you’re crazy. Never mind.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127826 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl.


The frick
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
39491 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

(you can google that information anywhere)


That was your 1st mistake.
Posted by brouski
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2008
371 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

At any rate, she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl. I fail to see how her later psychology education could have prepared her unless she took a time machine back to brief her younger self.


You, um, might want to reacquaint yourself with the facts of this case.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
15779 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

I’ve not really read it. But, isn’t this letter supposed to refute her statement about talking to someone regarding polygraph? 

If so, how could it possibly have been written until AFTER her testimony? So, it would have to be post hearing.


The letter itself is dated 10/2, but that's just in letter form.

The reason everyone thinks the GOP knew about it beforehand was because she was specifically asked if she had ever coached anyone on passing a polygraph, which doesn't really fit the narrative and didn't fit at the time it was asked.

Its kind of like Graham asking Kavanaugh about military tribunals out of the blue, it was out of place and has everyone guessing there's some underlying cause there.
Posted by RazorBroncs
Possesses the largest
Member since Sep 2013
15779 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

At any rate, she wasn't a psychologist when she took the polygraph, but a frightened 15-year-old girl. 


Welp, any shred of credibility you had is completely shot.

Nice try though.
Posted by ElmerPhudd
Member since Oct 2018
9 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:46 pm to
At 15? I recall someone saying that Donald Trump escaped from Area 51 after his flying saucer crashed.

If her ex wants to testify in front of the FBI, I'll be happy to see him called. Otherwise, his "sworn" testimony is useless. Plenty of Kavanaugh's actual roommates, friends & drinking buddies from Georgetown & Yale sent sworn affidavits directly to the FBI saying that Kavanaugh was lying, was a notorious drunk & was aggressive & belligerent when drunk (which Kavanaugh confessed to in an apology letter about his acting up at a dice game, saying he doesn't remember the details of the night) - which for some unimaginable reason is not calling them as witnesses. Outside of that, his letter is worth nothing more than the paper, ink, & postage stamp he sent to Fox (it also appeared on Heritage's Townhall & lots of the hard-right media and blogosphere bubble.

There are so many fake news rumors being spread against Ford and in defense of Kavanaugh that Snopes can't keep up with them. A picture allegedly of Ford posing with George Soros was really Lyudmyla Kozlovska, a Ukranian human rights activist (Soros has a long history of being the major private donor to democracy movements in Ukraine, Poland (Solidarity), and the other pro-democracy revolutions in the former Warsaw Pact nations.

The pictures of her allegedly posing with Harvey Weinstein and Bill Clinton are actually of Kirsten Gillebrand.

There are so many internet trolls sliming & lying about Dr. Blasey Ford, I suggest that anything you read in the conservative bubble media & social media be fact-checked before you spread it.
Posted by GeauxtigersMs36
The coast
Member since Jan 2018
12440 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:47 pm to
So he can’t be on the payroll too?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127826 posts
Posted on 10/3/18 at 12:47 pm to
Are you going to address the fact that you are completely clueless and you thought Ford did a polygraph when she was 15?
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram