- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Employers of Mississippi ICE raid illegal immigrants
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:58 pm
Not one charge. Not even a slap on the wrist.
Of course they're going to keep hiring illegals for low wages. There are no negative consequences.
Of course they're going to keep hiring illegals for low wages. There are no negative consequences.
16
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:59 pm to BayouBlitz
Fine the companies.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 1:59 pm to BayouBlitz
Yeah, that's bullshite. There should definitely be some consequences for them.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:01 pm to BayouBlitz
I'm not defending the employers here but the only way to make sure you don't hire illegal aliens is to completely discriminate against hispanics and other brown looking people and I'm pretty sure that won't fly, especially in court and the relevant regulatory agencies.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:02 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:
Of course they're going to keep hiring illegals for low wages. There are no negative consequences.
I don't have a problem charging employers, if there is some sort of generally fail safe system in place for allowing them to screen the legality of job applicants that doesn't risk them getting involved in any sort of discrimination claims.
At the same time, I have to think the risk of having a huge part of your workforce hauled out of your facility on a single day and deported, is also a pretty big disincentive in hiring such people.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:09 pm to BayouBlitz
I'd be curious to know the method of how they were employed. Were they actual employees of the company? It looks like Mississippi requires employers to e-verify all employees.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:10 pm to BayouBlitz
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/29/22 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:13 pm to Sentrius
You realize that these companies recruit the illegals? One chicken plant houses all of the illegals in company land.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:20 pm to BayouBlitz
The best way to stop illegal immigration is for companies to not hire them. The Koch Bro’s know that they are hiring illegals and face no consequences.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:49 pm to Geauxst Writer
quote:Koch Brothers do not own Koch Foods, i.e., the chicken plants.
The best way to stop illegal immigration is for companies to not hire them. The Koch Bro’s know that they are hiring illegals and face no consequences.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 2:59 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
I don't have a problem charging employers, if there is some sort of generally fail safe system in place for allowing them to screen the legality of job applicants that doesn't risk them getting involved in any sort of discrimination claims.
This!
My understanding is MS employers are not required to participate in the e-verify process for I-9 Forms. So as long as the employee shows them documents that are not obviously forged and they do not get any fraud alerts when they file the quarterly and annual returns/W-2s; how do you hold the employer responsible?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:07 pm to Sentrius
quote:
I'm not defending the employers here but the only way to make sure you don't hire illegal aliens is to completely discriminate against hispanics
E-verify would help.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:16 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:Are you sure about this? I have not heard that and in fact, have heard the direct opposite. Fines plus penalties up to and including RICO could imposed.
Not one charge. Not even a slap on the wrist.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:20 pm to NYNolaguy1
Until e verify can be used to screen potential employees it is basically useless. As it is now you have to give them the job then put the ball in their court while they are still employed by you. Only after a final ruling can you terminate.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:52 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
Are you sure about this?
Nothing yet. As reported by multiple news stations.
I'm not holding my breath.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 3:53 pm to Dead End
quote:
Fine the companies.
Fine the government for not doing their job and securing the border. Illegals should not be here in the first place.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:03 pm to Sentrius
I know you got downvoted to hell but there is a lot of truth in what you are saying. Employers walk a thin line between I-9 compliance on the one hand and Title VII compliance on the other.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:27 pm to BayouBlitz
Not one charge. Not even a slap on the wrist.
Link it up!
Do you own a bidness?
Link it up!
Do you own a bidness?
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:30 pm to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
how do you hold the employer responsible?
When "John Smith" doesn't speak a lick of English and is willing to work for 1/3 of prevailing wage... oh it might be an indication that something may not be right.
The laws we have are so minimal that it's very easy to let employers off the hook.
This needs to change.
Posted on 8/14/19 at 4:31 pm to BayouBlitz
The companies just hire through a third party "contractor" and boom they are good.
No effort is spent on prosecuting them because at the end of the day we need cheap labor.
No effort is spent on prosecuting them because at the end of the day we need cheap labor.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News