Started By
Message

re: Edward Snowden is a hero, anyone who says otherwise is a blubbering fool

Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:25 pm to
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:25 pm to
Name calling in the thread. Chivalry is dead.
Are you so self absorbed to be unable to imagine the point of view that could generate a differing take?
Does this blindness derive from being told in church that only your faith is the one true faith?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:26 pm to
I've answered your question. I don't need you to like my answer.

You clearly have no intention of answering mine, because like most of the others in here, you're talking out of your arse.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Absent Snowden, who was going to tell us?
What the hell did you need to be told? Aren't you protected enough?
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10605 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:26 pm to
I said some of them. My comment is factually accurate as per the norm. Like Trump's are. At 30,000 feet. What's baffling is some still haven't figured out they're being trolled as part of a strategy. Sorry, don't know how to spell strategy like ol Bush would.
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 6:28 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Then we should also jail everyone who knew about the shite that Snowden let us know that you acknowledge was good for us to know. 


Which shite? Or just the whole IC because "a whole lot" knew?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:28 pm to
Depends on your targets.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

I've answered your question

False.

You really shouldn't lie.

quote:


You clearly have no intention of answering mine,
I have answered it.

I said I don't know how many.

Now go back and actually answer the question.

Absent Snowden, how would the American public have learned of this shite? Who was going to tell us? Would we know today, if Snowden hadn't?

Your "response" came when I said that the people other than Snowden who knew about this shite but did nothing are at fault for Snowden. If they don't like how he did it, they should have fricking done it themselves.

I don't care if that number is 1 or a million because it quite obviously was not only Snowden who knew.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:30 pm to
quote:


Which shite?

Well, I don't know why you're asking me.

I do believe you already responded that he outed traitorous behavior.

Do you not know what that behavior was? That's odd.
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 6:31 pm
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

I said I don't know how many.


You haven't admitted you were talking out of your arse when you claimed it was "a whole lot."
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 6:38 pm to
I'm asking you.

"A whole lot" won't work here, either.
Posted by Ted2010
Member since Oct 2010
38958 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 7:29 pm to
Not really
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:03 pm to
quote:


You haven't admitted you were talking out of your arse when you claimed it was "a whole lot."
what's your definition of a whole lot?



Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:05 pm to
You said it. What's yours?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:05 pm to
quote:


You said it. What's yours

A whole lot
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:07 pm to
Cool.

Now that we've established that you were talking out of your arse, what else are you unclear about?
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:10 pm to
quote:


Now that we've established that you were talking out of your arse, what else are you unclearabout?
lol. There's no definition of the phrase.

Any number can be said to be a whole lot or, not.

You're not fooling anyone with the fact you avoided answering the question and STILL haven't answered it.
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 8:11 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10605 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:11 pm to
What grade of Wagyu?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

There's no definition of the phrase.


You asked for one, not me.

Doesn't change anything.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:16 pm to
quote:


You asked for one, not me.


Lol. Are you insane? Now you're just making shite up. Stop drinking. You've had enough
This post was edited on 3/4/17 at 8:17 pm
Posted by Iowa Golfer
Heaven
Member since Dec 2013
10605 posts
Posted on 3/4/17 at 8:16 pm to
Focus. What grade of Wagyu?
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram