re: “Due process” for deportations is as ridiculous as squatters rights.

But…you were the one who said it was improper even though it was illegal…

Also, there is nor was there a law that opened the US border.

This is getting embarrassing for you. Are you even reading what you wrote?

quote:

---

But…you were the one who said it was improper even though it was illegal…

---

I used the language the Supreme Court used. Deal with it.

quote:

---

Also, there is nor was there a law that opened the US border.

---

Biden ignored and bragged about ignoring immigration laws. Were you ignorant to that fact? Not surprising.

quote:

---

This is getting embarrassing for you. Are you even reading what you wrote?

---

You’re in over your head. Of the two of us…one has actually represented illegals in immigration court.

You dumb ignorant frick.

I’d also like to reiterate. You won’t be here in 5 days.

Let me break it down for you.

Garcia = “Person” Under the Law

The Fifth Amendment does not say “citizen” it says person.

That means all individuals on U.S. soil, regardless of immigration status, are entitled to due process protections under the Constitution. This has been upheld in multiple Supreme Court cases, including Zadvydas v. Davis (2001).

2. Garcia Was Granted Legal Protection by a Court

In 2019, a federal immigration judge granted Garcia withholding of removal—a legal status that:

Prohibits deportation to a country where the person faces persecution,

And is based on evidence and legal findings making it a legally binding decision under immigration law.

Deporting Him to El Salvador = Violation of Due Process

Despite that ruling, Garcia was deported to El Salvador anyway, a country he was legally barred from being sent to.

That action bypassed a lawful court order.

The government ignored a judicial process, removing him without lawful authority.

That’s exactly what the Fifth Amendment protects against: being deprived of liberty (his legal right to remain in the U.S.) without due process of law.

What questions do you have?

That’s a lot of words to say “that shitstain is in El Salvador and not coming back.”

You should definitely write another multiple paragraph post about it.

The point here is that you don’t care about the law. Again, just admit you believe the president should have unilateral authority to do what ever he wants, and then you can get upset when “leftists” call him an authoritarian.

So can't answer a question?

No wonder you are altered up in here.

Guess where hero Garcia is tonight despite your bitching on the internet.

I can answer it, but you’re not committed to understanding, and I don’t have all the time in the world.

Let me break it down for you because it’s troubling for me to accept that you might be slightly illiterate or intellectually dishonest and lazy…or both, idk.

Yes, prior hearings ordered his removal.

But a later, legally binding court decision prohibited deportation to El Salvador, the specific country he was ultimately sent to.

That’s what made his deportation a violation of due process- not because he never had hearings, but because the outcome of his most recent legal protection was ignored.

Like you’re 5:

Imagine a kid gets in trouble at school and the teacher says, “You have to go home.” That’s the first decision.

But later, the principal says, “Wait, it’s not safe for you to go home right now. You can stay here instead.”

Then, someone ignores what the principal said and sends the kid home anyway—even though they were told not to.

That’s the problem. It’s not that the kid never got in trouble. It’s that the final rule that was supposed to protect him was ignored. That’s not fair, and it breaks the rules.

Again, concerned for your level of literacy, let me break down your other misconception.

Procedure is how the law is carried out (hearings, appeals, etc.).

Due process is the constitutional right to have those procedures followed fairly and completely, and for the outcome of those procedures to be respected.

In Garcia’s case:

He did go through the proper legal process (you just don’t like it)

A judge ruled he could not be sent to El Salvador. That ruling was legally binding. When the government deported him to El Salvador anyway, it ignored the result of due process, not just the procedure itself.

Break it down a bit more:

Imagine you play a game, and there are rules everyone has to follow.

Procedure is like making sure everyone takes turns and plays the game the right way.

Due process means that not only do you follow the steps, but you also listen to the final decision—like when the referee says, “This player wins” or “This player gets to stay.”

In Garcia’s case, the referee (a judge) said, “You can’t send him to El Salvador.”

But then someone (the government under Trump) ignored that and sent him there anyway, even though the game was over and the final call was made.

That’s not just unfair, it breaks the big rule that says you have to respect the result. That’s what due process is all about.

Also, I told you I was a neuroscientist botanist and I know everything.

Is he a citizen of El Salvador?