Started By
Message

re: Dr. who worked with Biden shocked over cancer diagnosis — may have had it for 'a decade'

Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:16 am to
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
20697 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:16 am to
quote:

there’s no evidence that when he got his health status and the medical records were released that he had a prostate-specific antigen.”


Covid Vax doing work
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24888 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:20 am to
quote:

colonoscopy in 2021


That is not how that works

Colonoscopy does not detect prostate cancer, it is for detection of colorectal cancer. PSA tests (blood) are the method now, or the old way of a doctor giving you a prostate massage with their fingers.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
22680 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:32 am to
This guy is just freely reporting on his medical records?
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
3090 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Prostate cancer, in relative terms, is usually a very slowing growing cancer and older men are the usual patient. I'm of the opinion that they knew he had it a very long time ago, but his political team saw the potential repercussions of making it known publicly. It was a strategic political decision, plan and simple.

agree with this 100%
downvote away but i would expect nothing less from any other world leader - american republican or democrat or anyone else. don't want to project any weakness. 'member when trump was rushed to walter reed in the middle of the night his first term? never provided an explanation for that nor should they. unless a prez is confined to a hospital, they will always present as fit as a fiddle
Posted by greygoose
Member since Aug 2013
14208 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:14 am to
quote:

agree with this 100%
downvote away but i would expect nothing less from any other world leader - american republican or democrat or anyone else. don't want to project any weakness. 'member when trump was rushed to walter reed in the middle of the night his first term? never provided an explanation for that nor should they. unless a prez is confined to a hospital, they will always present as fit as a fiddle
Hell, FDR was POTUS for 4 terms, and it was very late in his administration before the public was made aware that he was wheelchair bound.

As far as Biden, it doesn't bother me so much about the prostate cancer omission, as it does his obvious deficient cognitive ability. He was not fit when he was RUNNING for his first time, and his handlers knew it. I'm acutally surprised he made it thru is 1st term.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9248 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:18 am to
Exactly the first thing I have thought. He has probably had this for a while, elected to not do treatment because of his age. They only released this information when they did to take some of the smoke away from the cover up scandal.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9248 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:20 am to
quote:


The old saying about prostate cancer is, "You don't die from prostate cancer, you die with it."


F ucking... This.
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
9248 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:20 am to
quote:

They were lying then and they’re lying now.
Posted by sidewalkside
rent free in yo head
Member since Sep 2021
4309 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Is it possible to "give" somebody cancer or to make it spread faster than normal? If so, what would be the motivations here? To send a message? If so, who is sending the message?


You are dumber than dumb baw
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
15005 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:23 am to
Sounds like a cooperative lie.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
106984 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Is it possible to "give" somebody cancer or to make it spread faster than normal? If so, what would be the motivations here? To send a message? If so, who is sending the message?


All signs point to Hillary.
Posted by Furious
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2023
1276 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

They were lying then, or, they’re lying now.


Correct. It is entirely possible that he does not even have cancer. He is clearly already dying from some form of dementia, but the "cancer diagnosis" changes the narrative and the MSM will no longer talk about the dementia hiding, thus prottecting his legacy in some way. Although his legacy is absolute garbage anyway.

The fact that they released this right after all of the dementia hiding reporting by the MSM is very telling to me.
Posted by leeman101
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2020
2422 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:28 am to
quote:

I mean, Biden did slip up and say he had cancer.


Yet did he know which type of cancer?

Plus why didn't they just take out his prostrate years ago if they knew? Did Dr. Jill not want an impotent husband from its removal?
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
21527 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:43 am to
"May not have cancer" but when it gets into the bones it's usually deadly. Restricted to the prostate gland , it's easily treated. The lymph nodes are usually next & then all goes down hill. All studies show it is a very slow growing form of cancer, so this doctor is correct, he's had it for a while for it to now be in his bones. So...........how / why / when was it missed?
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
30889 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:48 am to
quote:

They knew about it before the 2020 election.


That would not be surprising.
Posted by LawyerBillboards
Member since Jun 2021
82 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

You are dumber than dumb baw



There's at least one former U.S. Senator that has openly said he thinks it is possible.

The current narrative is incompetence. The doctors didn't notice Biden had cancer. The occam's razor theory is that they knew but covered it up.

It's still perfectly reasonable to ask questions about other theories that are circulating.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 10:50 am
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
34864 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:50 am to
I wonder if that is why he had that IV in his arm during the debates in 2020.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135499 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:11 am to
quote:

— may have had it for 'a decade'
Not a chance.

However, his larger point is this should have been detected in a POTUS prior to metastasis. Of course the salient question is "Was it?"

ETA: "Dr. who worked with Biden" may be misleading. Emanuel worked on policy with Biden. Emanuel has not practiced medicine / cared for patients since completing his fellowship about 3 decades ago.

This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 11:16 am
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162497 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:15 am to
Posted by Furious
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2023
1276 posts
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:18 am to
quote:

So...........how / why / when was it missed?


This is exactly what makes me think he may not have cancer at all. It seems to me that it is a;most impossible to miss this time and time again as he has had so many physicals over the years, expecially as president.

Prostate cancer is so easy to detect, and for it to be in the bones means he has had it for years.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram