- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. who worked with Biden shocked over cancer diagnosis — may have had it for 'a decade'
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:16 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
there’s no evidence that when he got his health status and the medical records were released that he had a prostate-specific antigen.”
Covid Vax doing work
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:20 am to OchoDedos
quote:
colonoscopy in 2021
That is not how that works
Colonoscopy does not detect prostate cancer, it is for detection of colorectal cancer. PSA tests (blood) are the method now, or the old way of a doctor giving you a prostate massage with their fingers.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
This guy is just freely reporting on his medical records?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 9:38 am to greygoose
quote:
Prostate cancer, in relative terms, is usually a very slowing growing cancer and older men are the usual patient. I'm of the opinion that they knew he had it a very long time ago, but his political team saw the potential repercussions of making it known publicly. It was a strategic political decision, plan and simple.
agree with this 100%
downvote away but i would expect nothing less from any other world leader - american republican or democrat or anyone else. don't want to project any weakness. 'member when trump was rushed to walter reed in the middle of the night his first term? never provided an explanation for that nor should they. unless a prez is confined to a hospital, they will always present as fit as a fiddle
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:14 am to beaux duke
quote:Hell, FDR was POTUS for 4 terms, and it was very late in his administration before the public was made aware that he was wheelchair bound.
agree with this 100%
downvote away but i would expect nothing less from any other world leader - american republican or democrat or anyone else. don't want to project any weakness. 'member when trump was rushed to walter reed in the middle of the night his first term? never provided an explanation for that nor should they. unless a prez is confined to a hospital, they will always present as fit as a fiddle
As far as Biden, it doesn't bother me so much about the prostate cancer omission, as it does his obvious deficient cognitive ability. He was not fit when he was RUNNING for his first time, and his handlers knew it. I'm acutally surprised he made it thru is 1st term.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:18 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Exactly the first thing I have thought. He has probably had this for a while, elected to not do treatment because of his age. They only released this information when they did to take some of the smoke away from the cover up scandal.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:20 am to greygoose
quote:
The old saying about prostate cancer is, "You don't die from prostate cancer, you die with it."
F ucking... This.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:20 am to Kattail
quote:
They were lying then and they’re lying now.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:22 am to LawyerBillboards
quote:
Is it possible to "give" somebody cancer or to make it spread faster than normal? If so, what would be the motivations here? To send a message? If so, who is sending the message?
You are dumber than dumb baw
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:23 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Sounds like a cooperative lie.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:25 am to LawyerBillboards
quote:
Is it possible to "give" somebody cancer or to make it spread faster than normal? If so, what would be the motivations here? To send a message? If so, who is sending the message?
All signs point to Hillary.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:26 am to Kattail
quote:
They were lying then, or, they’re lying now.
Correct. It is entirely possible that he does not even have cancer. He is clearly already dying from some form of dementia, but the "cancer diagnosis" changes the narrative and the MSM will no longer talk about the dementia hiding, thus prottecting his legacy in some way. Although his legacy is absolute garbage anyway.
The fact that they released this right after all of the dementia hiding reporting by the MSM is very telling to me.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:28 am to KingofthePoint
quote:
I mean, Biden did slip up and say he had cancer.
Yet did he know which type of cancer?
Plus why didn't they just take out his prostrate years ago if they knew? Did Dr. Jill not want an impotent husband from its removal?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:43 am to Furious
"May not have cancer" but when it gets into the bones it's usually deadly. Restricted to the prostate gland , it's easily treated. The lymph nodes are usually next & then all goes down hill. All studies show it is a very slow growing form of cancer, so this doctor is correct, he's had it for a while for it to now be in his bones. So...........how / why / when was it missed?
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:48 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
They knew about it before the 2020 election.
That would not be surprising.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:49 am to sidewalkside
quote:
You are dumber than dumb baw
There's at least one former U.S. Senator that has openly said he thinks it is possible.
The current narrative is incompetence. The doctors didn't notice Biden had cancer. The occam's razor theory is that they knew but covered it up.
It's still perfectly reasonable to ask questions about other theories that are circulating.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 10:50 am
Posted on 5/19/25 at 10:50 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
I wonder if that is why he had that IV in his arm during the debates in 2020.
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:11 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:Not a chance.
— may have had it for 'a decade'
However, his larger point is this should have been detected in a POTUS prior to metastasis. Of course the salient question is "Was it?"
ETA: "Dr. who worked with Biden" may be misleading. Emanuel worked on policy with Biden. Emanuel has not practiced medicine / cared for patients since completing his fellowship about 3 decades ago.
This post was edited on 5/19/25 at 11:16 am
Posted on 5/19/25 at 11:18 am to Keltic Tiger
quote:
So...........how / why / when was it missed?
This is exactly what makes me think he may not have cancer at all. It seems to me that it is a;most impossible to miss this time and time again as he has had so many physicals over the years, expecially as president.
Prostate cancer is so easy to detect, and for it to be in the bones means he has had it for years.
Back to top


0








