- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Does congress even know what SCOTUS just did to the agencies? Networks are giddy about TX.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:35 am
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:35 am
The networks are falling over themselves about the TX decision, but barely a mention of WV vs EPA.
Do they even know their green imitative was just nuked?
Edit...Fox just covered it with Larry Kudlow
Do they even know their green imitative was just nuked?
Edit...Fox just covered it with Larry Kudlow
This post was edited on 6/30/22 at 9:36 am
9
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:37 am to loogaroo
My question is this: does this also affect executive orders that carry the weight of law?
Example: Bush administration’s unilateral ban on Chinese firearms and ammunition.
Example: Bush administration’s unilateral ban on Chinese firearms and ammunition.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:37 am to loogaroo
What’s the TX decision? I must have missed that one.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:37 am to loogaroo
Explain this.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:39 am to BamaScoop
quote:
Explain this like I’m 5
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:39 am to WHS
quote:
What’s the TX decision? I must have missed that one.
Trump's remain in Mexico policy is toast.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:40 am to WHS
quote:
What’s the TX decision? I must have missed that one.
I’m assuming since it has to do with Texas and the media is giddy, he is talking about “stay in Mexico” being overturned
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:40 am to Missile
Explain this like I'm a 5 year old Maxine Waters.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:40 am to loogaroo
What do you expect?
Its the only thing they have
Really an irrelevant case due to Biden no enforcing the border at all
Its the only thing they have
Really an irrelevant case due to Biden no enforcing the border at all
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:40 am to WHS
quote:
What’s the TX decision? I must have missed that one.
SCOTUS gave the left a win on ending the "Stay In Mexico" edict.
Probably realized it doesn't make a bit of a difference with the frickery they're doing regarding illegals anyway.
As a side note, why do conservatives on here keep calling them "migrants"? They are ILLEGAL ALIENS.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:41 am to loogaroo
WV vs EPA is to complicated to explain to Democratic voters in 30 seconds.
While this ruling will have a huge positive impact on America Democrats won’t get very mad about it because it is to complicated for them.
While this ruling will have a huge positive impact on America Democrats won’t get very mad about it because it is to complicated for them.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:42 am to BamaScoop
quote:
Explain this.
EPA cannot arbitrarily make environmental regulations.
Congress has to make them before the EPA can enforce them.
Basically making congress do its job.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:42 am to loogaroo
My phone just told me that the Supreme Court has removed the ability of the EPA to fight climate change thereby endangering all of us (complete with WAPO picture of coal, slag heaps, and chimneys belching black smoke). Unbiased journalism.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:42 am to bird35
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:43 am to Eurocat
Oh look, another blind arse link by eurotrash.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:45 am to Missile
quote:
quote:
Explain this like I’m 5
Biden v. Texas - Allows Bidens executive order to remove Trump's "stay in Mexico" EO. Which directed removed migrants and sent them back to Mexico, while they await their trials.
Not the result that you'd hope for, but presidential EO's can be undone by other presidents.
WVa v. EPA - Removed the ability for bureaucratic agencies to create de facto legislation, as that is the job of congress and can not be delegated unless there is clear direction from congress. There is a lot more nuance to that, but that's the basic rough explanation.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:48 am to loogaroo
Let them have their little victory. Even if Texas won the Biden admin would have never enforced it.
The good news is now it will be a lot easier to rescind prior presidents EOs especially EOs without the Obama factor.
The good news is now it will be a lot easier to rescind prior presidents EOs especially EOs without the Obama factor.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:51 am to GumboPot
quote:
Let them have their little victory. Even if Texas won the Biden admin would have never enforced it.
THey haven't been enforcing it so it matters little.
And frankly it was an EO. How it was argued Biden couldn't reverse it I'll never know.
Not saying I'm happy it went away, but EO's are trash in the long run.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:51 am to loogaroo
quote:
Do they even know their green imitative was just nuked?
It didn't necessarily get nuked. They can still push it through legislation, but Congress critters will have to put their names on it.
Posted on 6/30/22 at 9:52 am to Tantal
quote:
They can still push it through legislation
Big Coal Manchin will get right on that
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News