Dem's new proof of Russian collusion: Bannon to Stone to Credico to Wikileaks. LOLLLL

quote:

---

But back to the main point: if Bannon to Stone to Credico to Wikileaks as spelled out in the Roger Stone indictment is Russian collusion then EVERYTHING is Russian collusion.

---

quote:

---

Everything except that which was actually direct collusion. Follow the trail of the Russian dossier, via, DNC to Steele to Russia and back

---

quote:

---

i pray people are brought to justice. If not, it will only embolden them to do it again

---

quote:

---

4) Why is the most outspoken POTUS in history not using firepower that we all know that he has (declass)? Hell has he not dropped enough hints.

---

quote:

---

Sounds like Qtard crap

---

quote:

---

Declassifying could interfere with an ongoing investigation.

Or

Pure political timing

---

quote:

---

So now we have the Stone indictment.

It alleges no involvement — by Stone or the Trump campaign — in Russia’s hacking. The indictment’s focus, instead, is the WikiLeaks end of the enterprise — i.e., not the “cyberespionage” of a foreign power that gave rise to the investigation, but the dissemination of the stolen emails after the hacking. And what do we learn? That the Trump campaign did not know what WikiLeaks had. That is, in addition to being uninvolved in Russia’s espionage, the Trump campaign was uninvolved in Julian Assange’s acquisition of what Russia stole.

The Stone indictment reads like an episode of The Three Stooges. Stone and two associates — conservative writer and conspiracy theorist Jerry Corsi, and left-wing-comedian-turned-radio-host Randy Credico, respectively denominated “Person 1” and “Person 2” — are on a quest to find out what WikiLeaks has on Hillary Clinton and when Assange is going to publicize it. But that does not suit Stone, who has cultivated an image of political dirty trickster and plugged-in soothsayer. In public, then, Stone pretends to know more than he knows and to have an insider’s view of Assange’s operation; behind the scenes, he scrounges around for clues about what Assange is up to, hoping some insider will tell him.

That is, it’s a clown show. A despicable one, at that. Assange is an inveterate anti-American who has done incalculable damage to U.S. intelligence operations. How interesting that Robert Mueller led the FBI during those debacles and has special incentive to dig into the WikiLeaks–Kremlin connection. And how interesting that Assange was a heroic figure to the Left, and the bane of the national-security Right, before his apparent distaste for Hillary flipped the script (at least for blind Trump and Clinton partisans). In any event, we have Stone and Corsi racking their brains about how to ferret out what Assange has got, and to understand the timeline in which he might release it — hoping against hope that it will kill off the Clinton bid. And we have Credico, Stone’s radio-host pal, dealing directly with Assange (mainly by interviewing him), then passing information along to Stone while imploring Stone to keep his (Credico’s) name out of it.

---

quote:

---

legal standard

---