Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

DEM Stabenow saying Roberts can rule on the spot!! about witnesses

Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:32 am
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42495 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:32 am


SO - questions of executive privelge require NO deliberation
This post was edited on 1/25/20 at 11:33 am
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32640 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:32 am to
Actually he can’t. Senate already voted on this

Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
77921 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:33 am to
Captain stabbin > stabenow
Posted by viceman
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2016
30688 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:35 am to
quote:

Actually he can’t. Senate already voted on this


and the Senate can override any of his decisions with a majority vote
Posted by Magician2
Member since Oct 2015
14553 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:36 am to
She actually is in potential jeopardy of losing her seat to John James this fall.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
30321 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:36 am to
quote:

Actually he can’t. Senate already voted on this

YES, I forgot about this. I think the Dems tried but it was tabled.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98699 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:39 am to
She also engaged in typical Dem mindreading, asserting Ukraine was concerned about the funds being withheld but didn’t say anything to anyone about it because they didn’t want to upset Trump.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21855 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:39 am to
Roberts has Zero Power as the "Judge" in an impeachment.

He only gets to rule as to what the Senate Rules are.

Read the Constitution!
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105375 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:42 am to
quote:

She also engaged in typical Dem mindreading, asserting Ukraine was concerned about the funds being withheld but didn’t say anything to anyone about it because they didn’t want to upset Trump.



Yep

I believe Stabenow is agreeing with Schiff's lies because she was threatened by senate leadership about support in her reelection. She doesn't believe the impeachment articles are constitutional, but she doesn't want to anger Schumer.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
98699 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:43 am to
As valid an assertion as anything the Dims have presented.
Posted by SSpaniel
Germantown
Member since Feb 2013
29658 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 11:48 am to
quote:

asserting Ukraine was concerned about the funds being withheld but didn’t say anything to anyone about it because they didn’t want to upset Trump.

The funds that they got 3 weeks before the deadline to get them? Those funds? Trump is a terrible with-holder of funds in chief.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
42495 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

She actually is in potential jeopardy of losing her seat to John James this fall.


WOW!! - I like Jones and detest Stabenow - I may contribute to his campaign even though I cannot vote.

hmm - could I go up there and identify myself as a refugee and get a driver's license along with a registration application?? all without any sort of ID???

Love to visit Michigan in the fall.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
29860 posts
Posted on 1/25/20 at 1:51 pm to
even further proof roberts is owned by the DNC, they already know he will rule their way as instructed
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram