- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Coons on Fox this am? Dropped hints of dems playbook in asking for FBI investigation?
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:30 am
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:30 am
First, let me preface & say I really don't like Fox & Friends but what are my choices? I don't get OAN & trust basically none of the others. But here's what Coon said:
He mentioned that the FBI investigation wasn't conclusive enough for his taste (surprise, surprise). He felt that the FBI should have interviewed Ford because she could have told her story to others and the FBI could have followed those leads and interviewed them.
YET, if everyone remembers, she testified under oath (already) that she ONLY told her husband & her therapist----> of which she refused to turn over her therapy notes to SJC. I think they wanted to hold those notes as a ransom to get the FBI to interview her outside of the SJC, that way she could send them to others who would corroborate what she was saying (not substantially mind you but still "other voices" which would make her more credible looking). BUT, this would mean she perjured herself, yes?
So what did Coons mean when he slide that little tidbit into the interview? Am I missing something!?!
He mentioned that the FBI investigation wasn't conclusive enough for his taste (surprise, surprise). He felt that the FBI should have interviewed Ford because she could have told her story to others and the FBI could have followed those leads and interviewed them.
YET, if everyone remembers, she testified under oath (already) that she ONLY told her husband & her therapist----> of which she refused to turn over her therapy notes to SJC. I think they wanted to hold those notes as a ransom to get the FBI to interview her outside of the SJC, that way she could send them to others who would corroborate what she was saying (not substantially mind you but still "other voices" which would make her more credible looking). BUT, this would mean she perjured herself, yes?
So what did Coons mean when he slide that little tidbit into the interview? Am I missing something!?!
10
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:34 am to Cali 4 LSU
Her lawyer will issue a statement tomorrow that she has found some long lost memories that can only be told to the FBI.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:34 am to Cali 4 LSU
Dems are dissatisfied that the investigation didn't last a month or more. The end.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:36 am to Cali 4 LSU
He's merely trying to sow doubt. That's it.
It's the cowards way of admitting defeat......without actually admitting defeat.
It's the cowards way of admitting defeat......without actually admitting defeat.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:37 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Am I missing something!?!
Beach friends, baw!
You think it was a coincidence that the ONLY other person she told in 30 years, were some random people she met at a beach one time.. I think their names were Steve... or maybe it was Frank.. or maybe Susan.. Better get the FBI to interview the entire country
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:38 am to Cali 4 LSU
fricking Coons.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:39 am to TheHarahanian
She either lied under oath when she said her lawyers did not advise her of the Senate’s offer to come to California to take her statement and they did so advise her; or, her lawyers did not in fact so advise her and they are in violation of the code of professional ethics.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:41 am to Cali 4 LSU
She probably would’ve given the entire Holton class roster, trying to send the Feds all over to delay it further. And then there would be more names, and more names, rinse repeat.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:42 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
He felt that the FBI should have interviewed Ford because she could have told her story to others and the FBI could have followed those leads and interviewed them.
Does he think he can direct an FBI investigation or something?
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:42 am to Cali 4 LSU
I listened to him this morning. Am I the only one who thinks he sounds exactly like Beldar from Coneheads?
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:44 am to Cali 4 LSU
Posted on 10/4/18 at 10:59 am to Cali 4 LSU
quote:Her statements are that she told NO ONE until she told her therapist in 2012, and never told anyone until she wrote the “anonymous” letter to DiFi.
FBI should have interviewed Ford because she could have told her story to others and the FBI could have followed those leads and interviewed them.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:16 am to Big Jim Slade
quote:
She probably would’ve given the entire Holton class roster, trying to send the Feds all over to delay it further. And then there would be more names, and more names, rinse repeat.
That's what I think.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:19 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
rachael butera spoofs Ford
So now they've attacked her!? OMG the hypocrisy. She's an impressionist for God's sake!!!!
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:22 am to Btrtigerfan
quote:
fricking Coons.
Always screwing things up.
Posted on 10/4/18 at 11:27 am to Cali 4 LSU
Well Coons should take that up with DiFi because maybe a longer investigation could have been completed if she didn’t sit on the info for so long. However that’s not what they want. Stalling is the only thing they want. Ford could come out tomorrow and say they made this entire thing up and the Dems would still try parade people out saying it did happen while trying to stall.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News