Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Constitutionally speaking, what is the correct way to handle a coup?

Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:47 pm
Posted by IAmReality
Member since Oct 2012
12229 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:47 pm
America has dealt with many things but we've never seen a coup attempt yet.

During the Civil War the rebels didn't attempt to usurp the federal government, they instead declared their own separate gov, so it wasn't exactly a coup per say.

I guess the way to handle it is to have the military put it down with as minimal force as possible, and then the conspirators be given fair trials for treason?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:48 pm to
Cut off the head of the snake and the body dies.


Start investigating ALL of these crooked mfers and your problems go away within 30 days.

Guaranteed.
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
35938 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:49 pm to
Pretend it doesn't exist. It's what we've been doing since Eisenhower.
Posted by tigerlaw
Madisonville
Member since Mar 2004
791 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

I guess the way to handle it is to have the military put it down with as minimal force as possible, and then the conspirators be given fair trials for treason?


This. The military can be deployed to put down a rebellion or insurrection.
This post was edited on 5/18/17 at 12:52 pm
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11787 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:55 pm to
USA would end as we know it either way.

Don't think we can survive another civil war and stay United States.

Posted by GeauxLSUGeaux
1 room down from Erin Andrews
Member since May 2004
23280 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:56 pm to
Seceding would be the exact opposite of a coup
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18664 posts
Posted on 5/18/17 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

During the Civil War the rebels didn't attempt to usurp the federal government, they instead declared their own separate gov, so it wasn't exactly a coup per say.


There is a term for that: succession. They broke away and claimed to have done it legally.

This is why a lot of people call Lincoln a tyrant. The argument is that the southern states had a legal right to break away and the remaining United States were the aggressors by going to war to bring the south back into the Union.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram