- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Colorado’s New Gun Law Is a Warning Shot — Here’s Why Every Gun Owner Should Be Watching
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:40 am
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:40 am
Link to article…
On April 10, 2025, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 25-003 into law, a move that sent shockwaves through the gun-owning community and sounded an alarm for Second Amendment defenders nationwide. This legislation, which bans the manufacture and severely restricts the sale of semi-automatic firearms with detachable magazines, isn’t just another gun control measure—it’s a direct assault on the constitutional protections affirmed by the Supreme Court. If you own a firearm or care about your right to self-defense, Colorado’s new law is a wake-up call you can’t ignore.
Let’s break it down: SB25-003 doesn’t just target rifles like the AR-15, which gun control advocates love to demonize. It casts a net so wide it ensnares most modern handguns—semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines that millions of Americans rely on for personal protection. This isn’t a narrow restriction; it’s a de facto ban on the most commonly used firearms in the country. The Supreme Court’s landmark 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller couldn’t be clearer: the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms “in common use” for lawful purposes, especially self-defense. Semi-automatic rifles and handguns fit that bill—they’re the backbone of modern self-defense. Colorado’s law doesn’t just skirt Heller’s precedent; it spits in its face.
Why does this matter beyond Colorado’s borders? Because it’s a blueprint. If this law stands, it’s a green light for every blue state to gut the Second Amendment. Imagine California, New York, or Illinois copying this playbook—suddenly, half the country becomes a no-go zone for modern firearms. Without national reciprocity, law-abiding gun owners could face a patchwork of bans that make travel or relocation a legal minefield. And don’t kid yourself: the endgame for gun control activists isn’t “common-sense reform.” It’s total disarmament. Colorado’s law is the boldest step yet toward that goal, and if it’s not stopped, it won’t be the last.
On April 10, 2025, Colorado Governor Jared Polis signed Senate Bill 25-003 into law, a move that sent shockwaves through the gun-owning community and sounded an alarm for Second Amendment defenders nationwide. This legislation, which bans the manufacture and severely restricts the sale of semi-automatic firearms with detachable magazines, isn’t just another gun control measure—it’s a direct assault on the constitutional protections affirmed by the Supreme Court. If you own a firearm or care about your right to self-defense, Colorado’s new law is a wake-up call you can’t ignore.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Let’s break it down: SB25-003 doesn’t just target rifles like the AR-15, which gun control advocates love to demonize. It casts a net so wide it ensnares most modern handguns—semi-automatic pistols with detachable magazines that millions of Americans rely on for personal protection. This isn’t a narrow restriction; it’s a de facto ban on the most commonly used firearms in the country. The Supreme Court’s landmark 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller couldn’t be clearer: the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to keep and bear arms “in common use” for lawful purposes, especially self-defense. Semi-automatic rifles and handguns fit that bill—they’re the backbone of modern self-defense. Colorado’s law doesn’t just skirt Heller’s precedent; it spits in its face.
Why does this matter beyond Colorado’s borders? Because it’s a blueprint. If this law stands, it’s a green light for every blue state to gut the Second Amendment. Imagine California, New York, or Illinois copying this playbook—suddenly, half the country becomes a no-go zone for modern firearms. Without national reciprocity, law-abiding gun owners could face a patchwork of bans that make travel or relocation a legal minefield. And don’t kid yourself: the endgame for gun control activists isn’t “common-sense reform.” It’s total disarmament. Colorado’s law is the boldest step yet toward that goal, and if it’s not stopped, it won’t be the last.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:42 am to Placekicker
Is there a large metro area that isn't a cancer?
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:43 am to Placekicker
It's a good thing the federal district courts of Colorado can enjoin this illegal law prior to a ruling on the merits.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:43 am to Placekicker
Colorado.....what a disaster. Once a great western hunting/skiing/cowboy state, now a progressive cesspool!
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:46 am to Placekicker
Insane what has happened to that state post-2004.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:48 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's a good thing the federal district courts of Colorado can enjoin this illegal law prior to a ruling on the merits.
For cases within the borders of Colorado, exclusive of national security considerations and absent obvious judicial activism I would agree.
Your boy is about to cause a national crisis if he holds the DOJ attorneys in contempt.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:49 am to SlowFlowPro
I see what you did there! 
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:50 am to Placekicker
At this point you're better off avoiding blue states altogether. I wouldn't want to carry a gun there, because if you get into a self defense situation you're likely going to prison for life even if you were defending yourself.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:51 am to BuckeyeGoon
Especially if you're white
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:51 am to Flats
quote:
there a large metro area that isn't a cancer?
Colorado's pisses me off the most out of any state. Its such a beautiful huge place. Great hunting, great grazing, vast expanses of wilderness, not the retarded weather of Wyoming. Its an outdoorsmans and cowboys dream.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:53 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Its such a beautiful huge place. Great hunting, great grazing, vast expanses of wilderness, not the retarded weather of Wyoming. Its an outdoorsmans and cowboys dream.
Yep, then Denver says "hold up."
Posted on 4/11/25 at 7:55 am to whowasbert
quote:It started as a cancer in Boulder as leftist academia took hold in the early 90's.
Insane what has happened to that state post-2004.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:01 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
CO -> Denver
IL -> Chicago
MI -> Detroit
PA -> Philly
GA -> Atlanta
AZ -> Phoenix
WI -> Milwaukee
NY -> NYC
VA -> DC Metro
It’s always urban vs suburban/rural.
Outside of Chicago Illinois votes the same as Indiana or any other red state for example and all of the states I mentioned would be red if not for their massive urban center.
I’m not sure how to fix the collectivist city vs individual rights surrounding areas divide but it feels pretty intractable and is the underlying factor in our current political divide.
IL -> Chicago
MI -> Detroit
PA -> Philly
GA -> Atlanta
AZ -> Phoenix
WI -> Milwaukee
NY -> NYC
VA -> DC Metro
It’s always urban vs suburban/rural.
Outside of Chicago Illinois votes the same as Indiana or any other red state for example and all of the states I mentioned would be red if not for their massive urban center.
I’m not sure how to fix the collectivist city vs individual rights surrounding areas divide but it feels pretty intractable and is the underlying factor in our current political divide.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:03 am to tide06
quote:
I’m not sure how to fix the collectivist city vs individual rights surrounding areas divide
The rural areas have to choose lower SOL and to be poorer, without the economic impact of the urban areas, basically. Become a Wyoming or one of the Dakotas.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:28 am to Placekicker
I always considered moving there one day, but the liberal cancer has taken it over. What a shame!
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:30 am to Flats
quote:
Is there a large metro area that isn't a cancer?
Miami
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:32 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
choose lower SOL
That's largely subjective.
And if AI does what some very bright people think it will do, that wealth advantage may evaporate.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:33 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's a good thing the federal district courts of Colorado can enjoin this illegal law prior to a ruling on the merits.
but they won't
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:36 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The rural areas have to choose lower SOL and to be poorer
I have run into no instances where this is true. It might be a lower SOL and they might be poorer on paper, but it's a much better life overall.
Posted on 4/11/25 at 8:37 am to tide06
Add Seattle and Portland
Amazing outdoor scenery and republicans everywhere around except in the shithole of a city
Amazing outdoor scenery and republicans everywhere around except in the shithole of a city
Back to top

19







