- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CNN: New scientific data shows warming started much earlier, models useless
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:48 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:48 am
quote:
Francesco Muschitiello, an author on the study and assistant professor of geography at the University of Cambridge, said the findings were worrisome because the early warming suggests there might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change.
quote:
(CNN)The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the onset of the 20th century, decades earlier than instrument observations would suggest, according to new research.
Lol theyll pivot
LINK
Muh settled science
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 10:50 am
27
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:50 am to Strannix
We are moving into a solar minimum...
They are going to have to pivot.
They are going to have to pivot.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:52 am to Strannix
quote:
there might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:53 am to Strannix
quote:
the findings were worrisome because the early warming suggests there might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change
Then adjust the models. No big deal unless you have an agenda.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:56 am to Strannix
quote:So, more evidence that it is all being controlled by that little star up in the sky - you know, the one that you can't see at night
(CNN) The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the onset of the 20th century, decades earlier than instrument observations would suggest, according to new research.
Solar minimum either this 11 year cycle or the next. Hopefully we won't find that there is a much longer cooling cycle than the 11 year (and worse than the 300 year cycle) that we are soon to discover.
And note: (CNN) apparently does not realize what this means for the political God of Climate Change/Global Warmists.
This post was edited on 11/25/21 at 11:07 am
Posted on 11/25/21 at 10:57 am to Strannix
Maybe global warming started at the end of the ........... ice age?
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:00 am to Strannix
It's still real to me dammit!
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:02 am to Strannix
quote:
there might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change.
There are always flaws in every model, and is dependent on the quality of the data (garbage in is garbage out). Models must be adjusted to better reflect reality.
Sadly, as demonstrated with the CoviD models, I fear we’ve gotten to the point where if the model doesn’t reflect reality, we reject reality rather than the model.
quote:
The Arctic Ocean has been warming since the onset of the 20th century
All that damned coal burning during the Industrial Revolution and whatnot.
Down with capitalism!
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:04 am to Jack Daniel
quote:
Maybe global warming started at the end of the ........... ice age?
Maybe it began a few hundred or perhaps a few thousand years before the end of the Ice Age which is why the ice sheets melted….lol
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:06 am to Strannix
Hasn’t the Earth been warming since the Ice Age?
No shite?????
No shite?????
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:07 am to JJJimmyJimJames
Bring on the big ducks baws
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:09 am to Strannix
The amount of ego you have to have to claim that you understand, and can control a macrosystem the size of an entire planet is mind-boggling.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:10 am to Strannix
quote:
might be a flaw in the models scientists use to predict how the climate will change.
I don't think we needed this study to tell us that.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:14 am to upgrayedd
quote:Excellent observation.
The amount of ego you have to have to claim that you understand, and can control a macrosystem the size of an entire planet is mind-boggling.
Maybe that is, in a nutshell, the malaise under which the progs/libs/lemmings suffer - MINDLESS EGO EXPLOSIONS
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:15 am to Strannix
I’m surprised they haven’t stated guns are causing some of it.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:19 am to Strannix
I always thought it started with the end of the Ice Age
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:20 am to Strannix
quote:
Muschitiello said it's not clear how much of a role, if any, human-caused climate change played in the early Arctic warming, and more research is needed. "We're talking about the early 1900s, and by then we've already been supercharging the atmosphere with carbon dioxide," he said. "It is possible that the Arctic Ocean is more sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought. This will require more research, of course, because we don't have a solid grip on the actual mechanisms behind this early Atlantification."
Holy hell! What buffoons!
If the warming occurred prior to the rise in CO2, then it kinda debunks the entire premise of anthropogenic green house gas release as the cause for climate change.
So what do these ideologues think? They blame the warming on some UNKNOWN human induced cause, and double-down by claiming that the CO2 has “supercharged” the warming.
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:25 am to Jimbeaux
quote:
supercharged”
I don't think they really understand what this word means...
Posted on 11/25/21 at 11:32 am to Strannix
The science behind climate change is anything but science. Total sham.
Why not just roll with the base benefits and value of global changes re: energy sources vs creating support from a false narrative?
These clowns are so accustomed to manipulation & deception, they can’t fathom truth & transparency when it actually serves as the appropriate approach.
Why not just roll with the base benefits and value of global changes re: energy sources vs creating support from a false narrative?
These clowns are so accustomed to manipulation & deception, they can’t fathom truth & transparency when it actually serves as the appropriate approach.
Page 1 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News