- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:28 pm to tigerfan 64
Imagine the mental gymnastics Hillary is doing to come up with a defense of the person who she thinks may have cost her the election.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:40 pm to L.A.
Catherine Herridge is a fierce ball buster who cares about nothing but getting to the truth and reporting it. If she says they have the goods, they have the goods.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:50 pm to GumboPot
quote:How embarrassing that your kids call you Elf on the Shelf…
My kids like Elf on the Shelf too.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:53 pm to LegndarySnipes
quote:
too bad most of her reporting is subscription only
Look into her not so distant past and the illegal bullshite a previous employer put her through and you’ll understand. The woman is the best in the business and has to make a living, she cannot trust any of the major outlets, and for good reason
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:53 pm to Rip N Lip
quote:
There was a guy at Fox that Obama kept tabs on, too, but his name escapes me at the moment.
James Rosen.
That's him. Thanks.
Posted on 9/25/25 at 10:55 pm to Rip N Lip
quote:
Feel like she’s always been a straight shooter and likely a tough bitch.
She wasn’t referencing this Coney issue, but I heard Megyn Kelly say this exact thing about her recently. Said she is a bitch that cares about nothing but the truth and the politicians hate her for it. I wish we had a press core full of Herridge.
This post was edited on 9/25/25 at 11:12 pm
Posted on 9/26/25 at 3:59 am to CDawson
When you got most of the judges in your back pocket this is what happens
Posted on 9/26/25 at 4:51 am to L.A.
This is a problem.
Those Grassley questions appear to be specifically set up to give Comey an out..
We know Comey used an intermediary, Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman, to pass the leaked information to the press.
Yet here are the questions:
1. "Director Comey have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports ..." Richman was the source
2. "Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source ..." Richman was not at the FBI
3. "Has any classified information relating to President Trump or his associates been declassified and shared with the media?" The material was not declassified.
Those questions were absurdly worded. How in hell do you not simply ask: "Mr. Comey, did you leak this?" "Mr. Comey, do you know how this leak occurred?" "Mr. Comey, do you know who leaked the information?" ?
There are built in qualifiers in each question Grassley was given to read. "Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports?" Why qualify "in news reports"? What conceivable non-nefarious purpose is served limiting the second question to "someone else at the FBI"?
It appears to me that whomever fed those questions to Grassley was likely in the game with Comey.
Those Grassley questions appear to be specifically set up to give Comey an out..
We know Comey used an intermediary, Columbia Law School professor Daniel Richman, to pass the leaked information to the press.
Yet here are the questions:
1. "Director Comey have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports ..." Richman was the source
2. "Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source ..." Richman was not at the FBI
3. "Has any classified information relating to President Trump or his associates been declassified and shared with the media?" The material was not declassified.
Those questions were absurdly worded. How in hell do you not simply ask: "Mr. Comey, did you leak this?" "Mr. Comey, do you know how this leak occurred?" "Mr. Comey, do you know who leaked the information?" ?
There are built in qualifiers in each question Grassley was given to read. "Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports?" Why qualify "in news reports"? What conceivable non-nefarious purpose is served limiting the second question to "someone else at the FBI"?
It appears to me that whomever fed those questions to Grassley was likely in the game with Comey.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 4:55 am to NC_Tigah
You don’t think they thought of those things when they issued the indictments?
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:14 am to SouthEasternKaiju
Two very excellent posts in a row. NCTigah’s especially. It has to be the case that either Grassley or somebody around him was in on the deception.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:17 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:I'm sure they did.
You don’t think they thought of those things when they issued the indictments?
Perhaps that's why the prosecutors' memo to Lindsey Halligan "found no probable cause to charge" the POS. Nor am I saying Comey walks. But this is a moment reminiscent of Clinton's "it all depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" statement. Technically, the answers Comey gave were correct.
Yet, Comey was obviously deliberately deceitful. That is where this will hinge. Did the POS tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth? Were I on the jury, I'd say the deceit would qualify as perjury. But the likelihood of a NoVa jury coming in with that finding is slim.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:22 am to NC_Tigah
Just asking, but " probable cause to charge"? Based exclusively on those narrowly defined parameters of the questions?
Bill Clinton was found guilty of perjury, just not in his impeachment trial. Comey isn’t getting impeached.
Bill Clinton was found guilty of perjury, just not in his impeachment trial. Comey isn’t getting impeached.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:26 am to GusAU
quote:
How embarrassing that your kids call you Elf on the Shelf…
Do people not have a senses of humor? It’s just a joke.
This post was edited on 9/26/25 at 5:32 am
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:29 am to GumboPot
quote:Apparently GumboPot does not...
Do people not have a senses of humor? It is as just a joke.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:56 am to L.A.
Herridge, John Solomon & Sara Carter are legit.
Posted on 9/26/25 at 5:57 am to CDawson
quote:
Will any real time be served?
Guess what, cupcake? Looks like we got that ball rolling yesterday, and we'll find out in due time.
Back to top


0






