- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Can somebody explain the burning bags to me?
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:27 pm to FLTech
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:27 pm to FLTech
quote:
the good guys in the FBI knew it was wrong to destroy that evidence, nothing got destroyed because they moved the evidence to another location in the building instead of actually destroying the evidence.
If true, this means there are still patriots inside who are willing to risk a lot for their country.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:30 pm to TrueTiger
God wanted the evidence preserved.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:42 pm to Rohan Gravy
Probably were stashed away from the pile of bags that go down to the incinerator in a corner.
In SCIFs there are always partially full burn bags around. They didn't intend to destroy them , just hide the documents.
In SCIFs there are always partially full burn bags around. They didn't intend to destroy them , just hide the documents.
This post was edited on 8/3/25 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 8/3/25 at 6:56 pm to FLTech
Imagine the government ever starting something and seeing it through till the end.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 9:08 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
The fact that they were "found in a secret room" means they're going to retcon this whole thing. That 2 page statement that came out saying there was no client list and Epstein died by suicide ended up causing a frick ton more trouble than I think the admin expected. They thought that by saying it, everyone would just move on. Instead, the complete opposite happened.
By finding these, they're able to work their way back from that insulting statement and suddenly find more meat on the bone.
I don't believe Dan's nor Kash's "secret rooms" had anything to do with the Epstein shite.
This post was edited on 8/3/25 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 8/3/25 at 9:15 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
If true, this means there are still patriots inside who are willing to risk a lot for their country.
What is the risk now?
They will be heroes
Posted on 8/3/25 at 9:16 pm to Rohan Gravy
Posted this earlier from the American Thinker. This is what a journo thinks:
The most probable conclusion from these facts is that one of the key conspirators is cooperating. Which means they have everything.
Furthermore the information in the burn bag was placed in an obscure place for the purpose of revealing the plot later. Coconspirators don't know who the snitch is and likely can't communicate amongst themselves anymore.
The most probable conclusion from these facts is that one of the key conspirators is cooperating. Which means they have everything.
Furthermore the information in the burn bag was placed in an obscure place for the purpose of revealing the plot later. Coconspirators don't know who the snitch is and likely can't communicate amongst themselves anymore.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 10:50 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:I had always assumed that any incriminating evidence would have been burned long ago.
Obvious question is why didn’t they burn them?
BUT - it may be that 'burning' classified or sensitive instruments may have some permanent documentary requirements describing who authorized it - why it is being destroyed - etc.
Maybe nobody wanted their signature on that document in the event that someone had a 'copy' and questioned its disposition later and kept hoping they could hide it away until the big orange monster went away.
But I would like to know the process - and why they failed to protect themselves this badly.
Sounds suspiciously fishy to me that it would still be laying around.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 10:55 pm to FLTech
quote:
Everybody "assumed" that the evidence was destroyed because it was scheduled to be destroyed on a certain date, but since the good guys in the FBI knew it was wrong to destroy that evidence, nothing got destroyed because they moved the evidence to another location in the building instead of actually destroying the evidence.
I really hope that this is the case - I cannot believe we could be so lucky - or that they were so careless as to allow it to happen - but I got no better answer for it either.
If some hero risked his job, if not his life, to do this we need to create a statue in his honor and declare a holiday once all the culprits are dealt with.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 10:56 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
The most probable conclusion from these facts is that one of the key conspirators is cooperating. Which means they have everything.
now THIS would answer my prayers -
Posted on 8/3/25 at 11:11 pm to FLTech
quote:
Here is what I heard from a guy on a podcast that is in the know. I think it was Mike Benz explaining it, but don't hold it to me....
What was the Pod?
Posted on 8/3/25 at 11:18 pm to TrueTiger
Maybe they thought they did. Maybe the lower level said yes sir and hid them away instead.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 11:27 pm to Rohan Gravy
Or maybe it’s another lie.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 11:50 pm to Rohan Gravy
quote:
Obvious question is why didn’t they burn them?
Two reasons
1.No use burning them and maybe being hit with a crime when Trump had them "SOMEWHERE" because thy damn sure did not find them at the Mara-Lago Raid.
2.) Maybe they hoped some incoming stooge would see them in these so called "burn bags" and burn them, that way they could not be charged with destruction of evidence. LOL
Posted on 8/4/25 at 12:21 am to Rohan Gravy
Two tours in an IC agency as a field grade military officer. Retired in 2013. This is how burn bags worked when I was in. Take it FWIW.
If you printed something classified, there were two ways to destroy it - you walked over to a shredder and shredded the document or you put it in a burn bag. Most analysts chose the latter option, because it didn’t require you to shred something as soon as you were done with it. You could throw it in the bag and wait - usually months - until dealing with it.
Burn bags were controlled and regulated. There wasn’t a communal or office burn bag - each was specific to a person. Mine was next to my desk.
When the bag - which was a doubled oversized paper grocery bag - was full, you’d fold the top over and tape it so it was securely closed, and mark it with your name, agency, contact number, and highest level of classification of the contents (TS/SCI/HCS in most SCIFs). You’d then drop it off at the pickup point for your office, which was usually in a corner or cubicle that was not being used in your work area.
When there was a sufficient amount of full bags - 30-40, the admin staff would collect them and drop them off at a specific location and time in the building (a burn bag run) to be taken away by a team (contractors) to a facility to be destroyed. A burn bag run was a controlled, documented event.
I share this to say, if burn bags containing years old information were discovered, it wasn’t an accident. These things don’t just lay around in a well run SCIF.
If you printed something classified, there were two ways to destroy it - you walked over to a shredder and shredded the document or you put it in a burn bag. Most analysts chose the latter option, because it didn’t require you to shred something as soon as you were done with it. You could throw it in the bag and wait - usually months - until dealing with it.
Burn bags were controlled and regulated. There wasn’t a communal or office burn bag - each was specific to a person. Mine was next to my desk.
When the bag - which was a doubled oversized paper grocery bag - was full, you’d fold the top over and tape it so it was securely closed, and mark it with your name, agency, contact number, and highest level of classification of the contents (TS/SCI/HCS in most SCIFs). You’d then drop it off at the pickup point for your office, which was usually in a corner or cubicle that was not being used in your work area.
When there was a sufficient amount of full bags - 30-40, the admin staff would collect them and drop them off at a specific location and time in the building (a burn bag run) to be taken away by a team (contractors) to a facility to be destroyed. A burn bag run was a controlled, documented event.
I share this to say, if burn bags containing years old information were discovered, it wasn’t an accident. These things don’t just lay around in a well run SCIF.
Posted on 8/4/25 at 6:34 am to The Torch
quote:This doesn’t seem plausible to me. They had plenty of opportunity and means between the election and when Trump took office to destroy whatever they wanted.
They never thought Trump would be back in office and got sloppy.
Posted on 8/4/25 at 12:45 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
The most probable conclusion from these facts is that one of the key conspirators is cooperating.
Which means they have everything.
I believe this is true.
I don’t think Trump, Tulsi, or anyone else in the administration would be speaking out so loudly and clearly
If they didn’t already have the goods
I also have to think that the evil bastids all know this
Their actions now will tell everything
Posted on 8/4/25 at 1:29 pm to The Torch
quote:Had the same question. As if putting them in burn bags would not look suspicious
Obvious question is why didn’t they burn them?
quote:
They never thought Trump would be back in office and got sloppy.
I cannot fathom anyone thinking Kamala was going to win, much less enough to think (for months between the election and change of power) “meh, I’ll take care of that tomorrow” then accidently running out of time.
This post was edited on 8/4/25 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 8/4/25 at 1:33 pm to Rohan Gravy
Okay - I don't think I'm telling family "secrets" (pun intended) here, but there is a long list of protocols that must be followed to handle/disseminate/access/transport/destroy classified information.
The container must be certified to the highest level of the material. The courier has to be certified/cleared, the electronic system, the markings, the shredder, the bag, the scanner, the file cabinet, the lock on the file cabinet, and it goes on an on.
Just imagine a person with severe paranoia wrote a bunch of government regulations that then got tweaked by government lawyers and then sent to manufacturers to actually make the stuff while scratching their heads.
And, things like Hillary's server, Joe's garage and Trump's document stash in MAL all still happen. Snowden still happens, etc.
So, what I'm asking everyone to do is to take a deep breath and let the information flow develop on this. Is skepticism warranted? Sure. Is this kind of thing wholly outside of the plausible window? Not at all. Mishandling and so forth happens all the time. We just hope it isn't fatal.
The container must be certified to the highest level of the material. The courier has to be certified/cleared, the electronic system, the markings, the shredder, the bag, the scanner, the file cabinet, the lock on the file cabinet, and it goes on an on.
Just imagine a person with severe paranoia wrote a bunch of government regulations that then got tweaked by government lawyers and then sent to manufacturers to actually make the stuff while scratching their heads.
And, things like Hillary's server, Joe's garage and Trump's document stash in MAL all still happen. Snowden still happens, etc.
So, what I'm asking everyone to do is to take a deep breath and let the information flow develop on this. Is skepticism warranted? Sure. Is this kind of thing wholly outside of the plausible window? Not at all. Mishandling and so forth happens all the time. We just hope it isn't fatal.
This post was edited on 8/4/25 at 1:47 pm
Back to top



3







