- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Calvin Coolidge made ~70% more executive orders
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i can't believe an academic such as BS would start spouting party-based propoganda.
Is this sarcasm? Academics are often some of the least intellectually honest people around, especially when it comes to politics.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:30 am to EST
quote:
Bayou Sam and all other Obama supporters - why are you all so loyal to Obama?
Unbridled ego. An inability to admit they made a mistake in supporting the guy.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:31 am to Godfather1
seems you guys have this covered!
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:32 am to Bayou Sam
quote:
than Barack Obama. Calvin fricking Coolidge. Just saying.
Oh, well that makes it better then.
Hey, you know what else, Pol Pot killed 25% of the population of Cambodia. The communist dictatorship of North Korea has maybe killed off 3-5%. So it all evens out.
Retard
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:33 am to Bayou Sam
quote:
The GOP decided in 2008 that they would not work with Obama on anything
That's odd, seeing that the democrats controlled the house, senate, and the presidency until 2010. Anymore "mind wizardry" you plan on throwing down?
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:40 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
What democrats have attempted to be Bipartisan? The definition of bipartisan is not going completely to the other side and letting them do what they want, it is meeting in the middle, something democrats did not do when they passed a health law without a single republican voting for it.
How can you claim this is a republican issue when the increased polarization in Washington is merely a reflection of the polarization on main street? Congressmen have one job- serve their constituents. The job of a congressman is not to go to Washington and let the other side do whatever it wants. You, however, appear to be pissed off because your side isn't able to do whatever it wants.
Oh, and by the way, you ARE aware that the people who gerrymander are the people who are members of the controlling party in state legislatures, correct? So your pathetic whining about gerrymandering, which happens on both sides, is in reality an attack on the decisions made by normal Americans.
The whole outrage over gridlock, however, is the symptom of a deeper sickness. We have grown to believe that increased government action and an increase in the amount of laws is somehow synonymous with the health of society, as if society cannot function without constant government authority. This sickness has come about because law itself has been perverted. Law's original function was to protect life, liberty, and property. Long ago, though, a great perversion happened, and government started plundering from one group in favor of another, hence the creation of lobbying, special interests, and the blurring of the distinction between functions of civil society (churches feeding the poor, etc) and state action. When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.
Hence, in 2014, we consider it immoral when the government is not actively involved in society. It has become the great tool through which everyone seeks to take the pie of others. It has become the great fiction in which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else.
what he said ^
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:44 am to Cajun Tigah
quote:
BlackHelicopterPilot
+++++++++++++++++++++
You sir, have a remarkable way of bitch slapping someone, and then just quietly walking away.
I wish I could be more like that dude
(except for that skin ailment, of course)
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:53 am to constant cough
“I taught constitutional law for ten years. I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that were facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all, and that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” B.O. 2008
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:59 am to wheelr
quote:
“I taught constitutional law for ten years. I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that were facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all, and that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” B.O. 2008
and Bayou Sam leaves, sobbing to himself.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:28 am to BugAC
We'll have 8 more years of this bullshite too when Bitch Clinton gets the nod.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:32 am to Bayou Sam
It's the quality/context of the executive orders, not the quantity at issue with Obama basically rewriting Obamacare and immigration law, etc.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:47 am to southernelite
quote:
How anyone can defend Obama is really beyond me.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 10:03 am to ManBearTiger
quote:Obviously. An EO declaring "National Chewing Gum Day" != suspending immigration law.
irrelevant
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 10:04 am
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:32 am to Bayou Sam
More Americans died under Lincoln's watch than any other president, yet they built a monument to him.
You can pick and choose your numbers without context to make just about whatever argument you want.
You can pick and choose your numbers without context to make just about whatever argument you want.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:34 am to southernelite
quote:Didn't Mitt Romney run on the promise to use executive orders to kill ObamaCare and Frank-Dodd, among other things?
I don't think any Repuican has said has complained about the number of executive orders. I believe the issue is that he is using the few EOs he makes to side-step congress.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:38 am to Bayou Sam
There were thousands more bombs dropped by Dolittle than by Tibbets. What's your point?
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:38 am to southernelite
It will be so nice when the Republicans take back the white house so that copious amounts of EO's is no longer an issue.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:45 am to mmcgrath
quote:
Didn't Mitt Romney run on the promise to use executive orders to kill ObamaCare and Frank-Dodd, among other things?
Yes, another reason why he shouldn't have been the R nominee.
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:46 am to AUbused
Back to top


0







