Started By
Message

re: Calvin Coolidge made ~70% more executive orders

Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:27 am to
Posted by TK421
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2011
10420 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:27 am to
quote:

i can't believe an academic such as BS would start spouting party-based propoganda.


Is this sarcasm? Academics are often some of the least intellectually honest people around, especially when it comes to politics.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
89091 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Bayou Sam and all other Obama supporters - why are you all so loyal to Obama?


Unbridled ego. An inability to admit they made a mistake in supporting the guy.
Posted by darkhorse
Member since Aug 2012
7701 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:31 am to
seems you guys have this covered!
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

than Barack Obama. Calvin fricking Coolidge. Just saying.


Oh, well that makes it better then.

Hey, you know what else, Pol Pot killed 25% of the population of Cambodia. The communist dictatorship of North Korea has maybe killed off 3-5%. So it all evens out.

Retard
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:33 am to
quote:

The GOP decided in 2008 that they would not work with Obama on anything


That's odd, seeing that the democrats controlled the house, senate, and the presidency until 2010. Anymore "mind wizardry" you plan on throwing down?
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49550 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

What democrats have attempted to be Bipartisan? The definition of bipartisan is not going completely to the other side and letting them do what they want, it is meeting in the middle, something democrats did not do when they passed a health law without a single republican voting for it.

How can you claim this is a republican issue when the increased polarization in Washington is merely a reflection of the polarization on main street? Congressmen have one job- serve their constituents. The job of a congressman is not to go to Washington and let the other side do whatever it wants. You, however, appear to be pissed off because your side isn't able to do whatever it wants.

Oh, and by the way, you ARE aware that the people who gerrymander are the people who are members of the controlling party in state legislatures, correct? So your pathetic whining about gerrymandering, which happens on both sides, is in reality an attack on the decisions made by normal Americans.

The whole outrage over gridlock, however, is the symptom of a deeper sickness. We have grown to believe that increased government action and an increase in the amount of laws is somehow synonymous with the health of society, as if society cannot function without constant government authority. This sickness has come about because law itself has been perverted. Law's original function was to protect life, liberty, and property. Long ago, though, a great perversion happened, and government started plundering from one group in favor of another, hence the creation of lobbying, special interests, and the blurring of the distinction between functions of civil society (churches feeding the poor, etc) and state action. When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

Hence, in 2014, we consider it immoral when the government is not actively involved in society. It has become the great tool through which everyone seeks to take the pie of others. It has become the great fiction in which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else.



what he said ^
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49550 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

BlackHelicopterPilot

+++++++++++++++++++++
You sir, have a remarkable way of bitch slapping someone, and then just quietly walking away.


I wish I could be more like that dude


(except for that skin ailment, of course)
Posted by wheelr
Banned
Member since Jul 2012
6046 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:53 am to
“I taught constitutional law for ten years. I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that were facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all, and that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” B.O. 2008
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57898 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 8:59 am to
quote:

“I taught constitutional law for ten years. I take the Constitution very seriously. The biggest problems that were facing right now have to do with George Bush trying to bring more and more power into the executive branch and not go through Congress at all, and that’s what I intend to reverse when I’m President of the United States of America.” B.O. 2008


and Bayou Sam leaves, sobbing to himself.

Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
31705 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:28 am to
We'll have 8 more years of this bullshite too when Bitch Clinton gets the nod.
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:32 am to
It's the quality/context of the executive orders, not the quantity at issue with Obama basically rewriting Obamacare and immigration law, etc.
Posted by DawgCountry
Great State of GA
Member since Sep 2012
33387 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

How anyone can defend Obama is really beyond me.


Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63503 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 10:03 am to
quote:


irrelevant

Obviously. An EO declaring "National Chewing Gum Day" != suspending immigration law.
This post was edited on 7/31/14 at 10:04 am
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17970 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:32 am to
More Americans died under Lincoln's watch than any other president, yet they built a monument to him.

You can pick and choose your numbers without context to make just about whatever argument you want.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37341 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

I don't think any Repuican has said has complained about the number of executive orders. I believe the issue is that he is using the few EOs he makes to side-step congress.
Didn't Mitt Romney run on the promise to use executive orders to kill ObamaCare and Frank-Dodd, among other things?
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53564 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:37 am to
You got a link for that?
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:38 am to
There were thousands more bombs dropped by Dolittle than by Tibbets. What's your point?
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7827 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:38 am to
It will be so nice when the Republicans take back the white house so that copious amounts of EO's is no longer an issue.
Posted by SoulGlo
Shinin' Through
Member since Dec 2011
17248 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Didn't Mitt Romney run on the promise to use executive orders to kill ObamaCare and Frank-Dodd, among other things?



Yes, another reason why he shouldn't have been the R nominee.
Posted by AUbused
Member since Dec 2013
7827 posts
Posted on 7/31/14 at 11:46 am to
Lol yeah, Bush never issued any EO's of substance:

Nothing to See Here
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram