- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Buffalo Shooting security guard
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:15 am
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:15 am
17
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:22 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:24 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
Water is not a fuel.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:25 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
I heard that it was gonna get 35 nautical miles to the gallon.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:25 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
Yes a brilliant mind works security to fund his life changing product …. Get outta here
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:30 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
Steam??
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:32 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
Steam
Hydrolysis
Run a current through h2o amd separates oxygen and hydrogen
Posted on 5/23/22 at 11:42 am to TigerbaitTigerbait
quote:that was a guy in the 80's who had popularized electrolysis use to improve gas mileage. he is the single person most responsible for vehicles having o2 sensors and computers. you people think computers in cars is just a natural developement. NOPE. those computers are in cars for the sole purpose of insuring vehicles burn more gas than is necessary. catalytic converters are there to burn off the excess gas that gets pushed through. don't believe me? go get your hands dirty and learn about your vehicle. this is not coming from somebody who just read all this and is regurgitating it.
a while back had achieved the same thing and fell dead leaving a restaurant.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:07 pm to TigerbaitTigerbait
Clean energy too ...
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:11 pm to arcalades
quote:
catalytic converters are there to burn off the excess gas that gets pushed through
Wait. Are you saying excess gasoline makes it from the exhaust manifolds to the catalytic converter where it is then ignited and burned?
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:14 pm to TigerbaitTigerbait
California hasno water to spare......they screwed.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:18 pm to TigerbaitTigerbait
Some things never change, I guess. Back in the 70s it was "this man invented a carburetor that got 100 mpg and GM had him killed".
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:32 pm to TigerbaitTigerbait
quote:
run a car engine off of water .
Water doesn't burn. So you can't run an internal combustion engine off water.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:34 pm to CFDoc
quote:
Water is not a fuel.
Yes it is! When I was ten I had a car that was propelled forward by a water balloon.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:36 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Hydrolysis
Run a current through h2o amd separates oxygen and hydrogen
Although you can make an engine run by burning hydrogen, and you can make Hydrogen through electrolysis, It would never make sense to do the electrolysis on board the car.
If you have enough electric power on board to generate Hydrogen through electrolysis, it would be more efficient to use the electric power to drive a motor directly.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:37 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Hydrolysis
Where do you get the energy to do hydrolysis from?
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:38 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
Hydrolysis Run a current through h2o amd separates oxygen and hydrogen
Well. The only thing he would have to perfect is the portable nuclear reactor it would take to generate enough hydrogen from water to run a vehicle. Because it’s only gonna be Doc Brown’s 1.21 Gigawatts that does that. Not 12 volts.
And if that person can do anything but be a running joke about that, he should be in charge of DARPA. Not working security at a store.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 12:46 pm to arcalades
I did hear about one somewhat promising way to use water to make a gas engine more efficient: I think it was called a 6-stroke cycle.
After the normal 4 strokes (intake, compression, power, exhaust) they would squirt a little water into the cylinder. This would give a steam power stroke using the residual heat in the cylinder, and cool the cylinder at the same time. But there were several practical issues in making it a viable alternative and to date hasn't gone anywhere.
After the normal 4 strokes (intake, compression, power, exhaust) they would squirt a little water into the cylinder. This would give a steam power stroke using the residual heat in the cylinder, and cool the cylinder at the same time. But there were several practical issues in making it a viable alternative and to date hasn't gone anywhere.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News