Started By
Message

re: BREAKING on Hannity: Judicial Watch obtains new emails exposing Steele contacts

Posted on 6/11/19 at 11:32 pm to
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118636 posts
Posted on 6/11/19 at 11:32 pm to
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 12:15 am to
Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 12:21 am to
quote:

You will enjoy today’s show.


What the.....Do you think Obama had dirt on Roberts to get Obamacare through!?!?!?

Listening to Bongino now, almost done! Obama's admin "never a hint of a scandal".....

No, of course not, cause Obama WAS THE SCANDAL!!!!
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
73210 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 12:22 am to
quote:

Why you guys fall for this nonsense every time I don't understand


From a guy who said Trump colluded with russia for 2yrs
Posted by PanhandleTigah
Florida Freedom Zone
Member since May 2008
9405 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 9:49 am to
quote:

Cali 4 LSU

Of course they had dirt on Roberts! There is no other explanation for his bizarre ruling.

And come on Cali.....Not a Smidgen!
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35361 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:09 am to
quote:

explain which part is none-sense?

I understand Hannity is a total hack machine as most of can't stand him and we're conservatives but facts are facts, right?
what facts? That there were meetings? Can you tell me when, where, what they were about?
Posted by mwade91383
Washington DC
Member since Mar 2010
5637 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:16 am to
That this is a bombshell and will somehow be meaningful. Which is the only question that really matters.

Just look at the poliboard, less than 24 hours later, one thread (this one). Either it’s a bombshell w big implications or it’s not, see if you can figure out which.
Posted by bfniii
Member since Nov 2005
17840 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

what facts? That there were meetings? Can you tell me when, where, what they were about?
and this is the standard, obligatory lib response - get people mired in the forest so they don't see the trees.

what part of

these facts

do you disagree with?
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52749 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 10:38 am to
quote:

what facts?


Posted by Cali 4 LSU
GEAUX TIGERS!
Member since Sep 2007
6507 posts
Posted on 6/12/19 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

That this is a bombshell and will somehow be meaningful. Which is the only question that really matters.


First of all....no one said this was a bombshell. It was presented on Hannity as "Breaking News" which is how I presented it here in the OP. Second, how is the information presented not meaningful? It literally provides proof that the Obama DOJ, Obama State Dept, & outside (dem) contractors COLLUDED to use UNVERIFIED information to likely blackmail political opponents. Is this NOT a million times WORSE than Watergate, the very scandal dems in the house have decried this very week!?!!?!?


quote:

Just look at the poliboard, less than 24 hours later, one thread (this one). Either it’s a bombshell w big implications or it’s not, see if you can figure out which.


Well we will just have to see where this all leads won't we? If you don't care, just say that. Others may actually care that the Obama gov't was corrupt as shite & committed political treason---a million times worse than Watergate!!!
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 4Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram